Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Oil filter Relocation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2018, 04:23 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
beaker80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 337
Received 57 Likes on 46 Posts

Default

Thanks for the links. 45's would be ok. A bit less pressure drop than a 90. It all depends on your install location. I found the intercooler bracket was perfect. The hoses also add a bit of support.
Old 02-08-2018, 06:01 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Mike94ZLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 494
Received 38 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by beaker80
Thanks for the links. 45's would be ok. A bit less pressure drop than a 90. It all depends on your install location. I found the intercooler bracket was perfect. The hoses also add a bit of support.
I'm planning on duplicating your setup, I just need to crawl out there and measure but it's 20 degrees out, starting to snow, and I have little motivation to do anything right now. I'd love to have as much as possible ready for a warm day though!

Where in Ontario are you? I have a summer home/cottage in Bright's Grove, just outside of Sarnia. Love it there!
Old 02-08-2018, 06:36 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Mike94ZLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 494
Received 38 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

I think I'm going to use these to close off the other side of the oil filter bracket:

http://www.jegs.com/i/Trans-Dapt/969/9064/10002/-1

Magnetic plugs, figure they can't hurt and will trap any metal in the oil. For $8, it's peace of mind.

Also, I found a 5' section of the push-loc hose, if you want to save $30

http://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS-Performan...02030/10002/-1

Last edited by Mike94ZLT1; 02-08-2018 at 06:42 PM.
Old 02-08-2018, 07:08 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Mike94ZLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 494
Received 38 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

Now I'm wondering if I should switch out to the Aeroquip hose. The Jeg's Push-loc hose is rated to 212 degrees, and I'd bet the EB sees higher oil temps than that.
Old 02-08-2018, 08:06 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
beaker80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 337
Received 57 Likes on 46 Posts

Default

I'm just north of Toronto in Newmarket. It 14*F here now. Windchill is 3*F. Yup too cold to be lying in the drive.

Magnetic plugs are a good idea but there is little to no flow at that end of the housing.

I ended up going with 5/8 X 1/2 NPT fittings and 5/8 hydraulic hose. The fittings I found at Lowes. My memory is good but not that good. I found my receipts and the hose I got at a local hydraulic outfitter. I'll see if I can find some markings on it as to pressure (300 psi) and temp rating (??). Mines been on since July 2014. I know the trans can see higher than 205*F and water temps are similar. I don't what oil temps are.






Old 02-08-2018, 11:14 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Mike94ZLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 494
Received 38 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

I googled the part number, I guess there's two different types of USMSHA 2G-11C hose. Some of it is rated to 100 C / 212F, and some of it is rated to 121 C / 249F. Both sound low for an oil temp rating, but if it's been fine for four years who knows. I'm sure there's a safety margin built in there.
Old 02-08-2018, 11:59 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Z7What's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 6,130
Received 871 Likes on 695 Posts

Default

Being as the EcoBoost and 5.0L use the same filter couldnt you just get a kit designed for the 5.0L?


https://www.summitracing.com/search/...ize/22mm-x-1-5


Wayne






Wayne
Old 02-09-2018, 12:07 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Mike94ZLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 494
Received 38 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Z7What
Being as the EcoBoost and 5.0L use the same filter couldnt you just get a kit designed for the 5.0L?


https://www.summitracing.com/search/...ize/22mm-x-1-5


Wayne
Absolutely, all the numbers match up. I don't like those hoses or those fittings though, I'd prefer to have a setup with AN fittings so it could easily be disconnected or removed if need be. Also, I like the idea of running two filters to increase oil capacity.
Old 02-09-2018, 02:08 AM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
Z7What's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 6,130
Received 871 Likes on 695 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike94ZLT1
Absolutely, all the numbers match up. I don't like those hoses or those fittings though, I'd prefer to have a setup with AN fittings so it could easily be disconnected or removed if need be. Also, I like the idea of running two filters to increase oil capacity.

Just a FYI, they have those too


https://www.summitracing.com/parts/trd-1227/overview/


https://www.summitracing.com/parts/ham-3387/overview/


Wayne
The following users liked this post:
Mike94ZLT1 (02-09-2018)
Old 02-09-2018, 08:43 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
beaker80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 337
Received 57 Likes on 46 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike94ZLT1
I googled the part number, I guess there's two different types of USMSHA 2G-11C hose. Some of it is rated to 100 C / 212F, and some of it is rated to 121 C / 249F. Both sound low for an oil temp rating, but if it's been fine for four years who knows. I'm sure there's a safety margin built in there.
Thanks for the hose info. I'm going to stop by my hydraulics supplier and inquire about the hose I have. I did a short search and most 300 psi rated hose has a burst rating of 1200 psi but like you found most are rated to 100*C.


Quick Reply: Oil filter Relocation



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:40 AM.