Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

My first post here, F150 Ecoboost question:

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2013, 12:01 AM
  #21  
Member
 
AKFX4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The last Frontier
Posts: 37
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I have a 2013 FX4 w/3.73, running 275/70 18's 2" lvl and get between 14.7 and the best I have got is 16.1 for about two milliseconds and got bored driving 55, love it.
Old 05-06-2013, 12:06 AM
  #22  
Retired and loving it!

 
Adobe2X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,810
Received 536 Likes on 398 Posts

Default

For heaven's sake, just GET the 3.73's and be done with it. They are great gears for the EB because they keep the engine right in the sweet spot at the beginning of the torque curve on the highway -- just shy of 2,000 rpm.
With these gears at highway speed, you will love how the EB never, and I mean NEVER downshifts at freeway speeds, regardless of the grade!
The following users liked this post:
Driver72 (05-06-2013)
Old 05-06-2013, 01:29 AM
  #23  
Junior Member
 
eteele's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My mom has a 2012 EB fx4 lariat crew cab and when she comes from missouri to visit me in louisiana she averages aroumd 23-25 mpg and she drives 70-75! I dont know why yall are getting such horrible fuel mileage!!
Old 05-06-2013, 01:38 AM
  #24  
F150 Greenhorn
 
jerparker1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Southeast, Iowa
Posts: 713
Received 109 Likes on 93 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by eteele
My mom has a 2012 EB fx4 lariat crew cab and when she comes from missouri to visit me in louisiana she averages aroumd 23-25 mpg and she drives 70-75! I dont know why yall are getting such horrible fuel mileage!!
FX4 Lariat? Never heard of such a thing. Did you create an account just to stir up sh*t?
Old 05-06-2013, 04:02 AM
  #25  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Driver72's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 8
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HardcoreFXFour
If you're worried about the gas mileage difference between a 3.73 and a 3.55, I don't think you should be driving a truck IMO..
I'm not "worried" per se, just that I drove the 3.55 and liked it.
I also had the 3.55 in my Mustang 5.0 and to me it's the best combo of
performance when needed and economy when cruising.
I'd like a truck for the occasional trips to the Lowe's as well as picking up supplies and also the occasional light duty off road excursions. Then there is the times when we get lots of rain and the roads can get a foot of water that I'm always not willing to drive in with my car.

But the reality is, 90% of the time, I won't need a truck, so in those cases, while commuting, it would be nice to get gas mileage in the upper teens per gallon. Just wasn't sure if the 15 city / 21 hwy (17 combined) figure the EPA has on the truck is anywhere close to what you get with the 3.73 gears.
I'd easily expect that with the 3.31's and even possibly with the 3.55's if driven softly, but I was skeptical with the 3.73's.
It seems doubtful you could get 21 mpg on the highway with the 3.73's considering that you are running probably 400 rpms higher at 70 mph than you would with a 3.31 axle.

Thanks to those who chimed in about their real world MPG's with their eco 4x4 with 3.73's
Old 05-06-2013, 04:06 AM
  #26  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Driver72's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 8
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jerparker1
FX4 Lariat? Never heard of such a thing. Did you create an account just to stir up sh*t?
I think he meant 4x4 lariat
Old 05-06-2013, 06:43 AM
  #27  
Eye of the Tiger
iTrader: (1)
 
captainnemojr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 288
Received 28 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

I have a truck exactly like you are looking at. I get 17.5 on the hwy going 75-80. At those speeds, the RPM is about 2050. I got 16 on a hunting trip with 4 people (avg weight 250 per person) and a bed full of gear.

Just remember those EPA figures are for a short bed, regular cab, 4x2 EB with the 3.31 rear end.
Old 05-06-2013, 07:07 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Brutus10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Tacoma, Washington
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Can't speak for 2012 but on the 2013s the lariat offroad package comes with 3.55.
Old 05-06-2013, 08:30 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
packplantpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,964
Received 584 Likes on 404 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by captainnemojr
I have a truck exactly like you are looking at. I get 17.5 on the hwy going 75-80. At those speeds, the RPM is about 2050. I got 16 on a hunting trip with 4 people (avg weight 250 per person) and a bed full of gear.

Just remember those EPA figures are for a short bed, regular cab, 4x2 EB with the 3.31 rear end.
Probably the 3.15 rear end.
Old 05-06-2013, 09:10 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
94-F150-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 441
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

3.31 vs 3.73 would be a little over 200 rpm difference at 70 mph but 3.55 vs 3.73 would be less than 100 rpms. Check out this calculator, it works great. http://www.grimmjeeper.com/gears.html
The following users liked this post:
Driver72 (05-07-2013)


Quick Reply: My first post here, F150 Ecoboost question:



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:50 AM.