Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

My EcoBoost Torture Test

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2012, 09:43 PM
  #121  
King Ranchin' Member
Thread Starter
 
24packman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina/Raleigh, North Carolin
Posts: 1,125
Received 63 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gimmie11s
Good job putz. You accomplished 2 amazing feats in one post

1. Showed everyone how foolish you are by posting incorrect info regarding packages available on the F150 EB. Fact is you cannot buy a max tow EB with 3.55. WIth 3.73 you can. Introduce Max tow and radiator is different, hitch is different, springs are different.

2. Showed eveyrone how you lack common understanding of what a troll is. Ill be happy to post a deffinition.

Troll: A new member with a low post count whos purupose on the forum is simply to cause disruption by posting incorrect information. <//==--- Wait a minute...... Thats you.
I think you misunderstood his statement. He said a 3:55 Eco and a 3:73 Eco are the same truck minus rear ends. He then states that his you have the Max tow then there are differences.
Old 12-04-2012, 10:08 PM
  #122  
King Ranchin' Member
Thread Starter
 
24packman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina/Raleigh, North Carolin
Posts: 1,125
Received 63 Likes on 57 Posts
Default Official Feedback!

Here is the Final Results of today's trip:

Tickets:None
Wrecks:None
Blowouts:None

Average MPG: 7.1
Average Speed: 70 mph
Trip Distance: 191 miles
90% Highway 10% City

Fuel Economy Feedback:Was a bit disappointed, was hoping closer to 10. Alot of stretches of road, especially out of Greenville were uphill climbs, not steep, just long. It dropped to around 6.8 if you went 65 mph and climbed up to 7.1 the closer you got to 75 mph.

Pulling Feedback: The truck was fine pulling the load, kinda shocked me on how well it could get the trailer moving. My previous 5.4L could do it just a little bit easier, but it also had two extra cylinders. Turbo lag was barely noticable, but once they kicked it made a difference. The turbo whistle under load is a pretty sweet sound. The truck felt like a little diesel pulling, but I mean it is turbo charged and direct injected.

Cruising Feedback: The Ecoboost loves high RPMs, especially when towing. At 70 mph the truck would be in 4th gear at 2100-3000 RPMs. I probably could have bumped up around 75 mph and had it shift into 5th, but did not feel like taking that chance with such a heavy load. When cruising, you get a slight purr out of the engine, but nothing extreme. The truck felt very comfortable going down the highway.

Braking Feedback. Besides the truck disk brakes, the trailer has a compression trailer system with drums. The truck was very well mannered here and the transmission made slowing down for off ramps a breeze. The Tow/haul on this truck does a better job compared to my previous 5.4.

Overall Feedback: The truck did stellar in my opinion today. It felt like it had plenty of power for pulling as well as stopping. The only thing I would do different next time would have different tires on the truck. The stock P rated Pirellis were a bit sqirmy at times. Other than that it was a very enjoyable trip and a easy load.

If you have questions please ask, If I didn't cover something just let me know! Happy Trails

Pics are coming!
The following 2 users liked this post by 24packman:
Airpoppoff (12-05-2012), cbears (12-06-2012)
Old 12-04-2012, 10:11 PM
  #123  
King Ranchin' Member
Thread Starter
 
24packman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina/Raleigh, North Carolin
Posts: 1,125
Received 63 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Here's some pics!



My EcoBoost Torture Test-forumrunner_20121204_221101.jpg



My EcoBoost Torture Test-forumrunner_20121204_221016.jpg



My EcoBoost Torture Test-forumrunner_20121204_221031.jpg



My EcoBoost Torture Test-forumrunner_20121204_221048.jpg



My EcoBoost Torture Test-forumrunner_20121204_221123.jpg
Old 12-04-2012, 10:13 PM
  #124  
Senior Member
 
bell4fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 606
Received 37 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

So you think the 5.4 pulled better?
Old 12-04-2012, 10:13 PM
  #125  
Flatlander
 
smurfs_of_war's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,207
Received 283 Likes on 197 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 24packman
My previous 5.4L could do it just a little bit easier, but it also had two extra cylinders.
Cue drama llamas in 3...2...1....
Old 12-04-2012, 10:14 PM
  #126  
Flatlander
 
smurfs_of_war's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,207
Received 283 Likes on 197 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 24packman
Here is the Final Results of today's trip:

Tickets:None
Wrecks:None
Blowouts:None

Average MPG: 7.1
Average Speed: 70 mph
Trip Distance: 191 miles
90% Highway 10% City

Fuel Economy Feedback:Was a bit disappointed, was hoping closer to 10. Alot of stretches of road, especially out of Greenville were uphill climbs, not steep, just long. It dropped to around 6.8 if you went 65 mph and climbed up to 7.1 the closer you got to 75 mph.

Pulling Feedback: The truck was fine pulling the load, kinda shocked me on how well it could get the trailer moving. My previous 5.4L could do it just a little bit easier, but it also had two extra cylinders. Turbo lag was barely noticable, but once they kicked it made a difference. The turbo whistle under load is a pretty sweet sound. The truck felt like a little diesel pulling, but I mean it is turbo charged and direct injected.

Cruising Feedback: The Ecoboost loves high RPMs, especially when towing. At 70 mph the truck would be in 4th gear at 2100-3000 RPMs. I probably could have bumped up around 75 mph and had it shift into 5th, but did not feel like taking that chance with such a heavy load. When cruising, you get a slight purr out of the engine, but nothing extreme. The truck felt very comfortable going down the highway.

Braking Feedback. Besides the truck disk brakes, the trailer has a compression trailer system with drums. The truck was very well mannered here and the transmission made slowing down for off ramps a breeze. The Tow/haul on this truck does a better job compared to my previous 5.4.

Overall Feedback: The truck did stellar in my opinion today. It felt like it had plenty of power for pulling as well as stopping. The only thing I would do different next time would have different tires on the truck. The stock P rated Pirellis were a bit sqirmy at times. Other than that it was a very enjoyable trip and a easy load.

If you have questions please ask, If I didn't cover something just let me know! Happy Trails

Pics are coming!
Good feedback. I'd say those are pretty decent figures and its good to know what it can handle. So, when you pull that boat up here for me- it shouldn't be a problem
Old 12-04-2012, 10:15 PM
  #127  
King Ranchin' Member
Thread Starter
 
24packman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina/Raleigh, North Carolin
Posts: 1,125
Received 63 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bell4fan
So you think the 5.4 pulled better?
No, I think the Ecoboost is a ton better engine. I just think that the 5.4 had a little bit more displacement that helped it in first gear, but after that the Ecoboost outperformed it 100 to 1.
The following users liked this post:
bell4fan (12-04-2012)
Old 12-04-2012, 10:16 PM
  #128  
King Ranchin' Member
Thread Starter
 
24packman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina/Raleigh, North Carolin
Posts: 1,125
Received 63 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by smurfs_of_war
Good feedback. I'd say those are pretty decent figures and its good to know what it can handle. So, when you pull that boat up here for me- it shouldn't be a problem
You cover the gas and a lil bit for me and i'll be your man!
Old 12-04-2012, 10:21 PM
  #129  
Official Member: Vast RWC
 
gimmie11s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,223
Received 35 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Mid 7s mpg is what i get towing my 10k toy hauler .... Sounds about right.
Old 12-04-2012, 10:44 PM
  #130  
Senior Member
 
jcain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,595
Received 461 Likes on 310 Posts

Default

So you think your 5.4 with 35s could get a load moving better than a motor that completely out torques it throughout the powerband and has a much shorter 1st gear? Interesting.


Quick Reply: My EcoBoost Torture Test



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:59 PM.