Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fast Lane Truck: Ecoboost vs i-Force vs Ecotec

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2013, 07:22 PM
  #401  
Member
 
candude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 58
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

The 22" wheels on that Limited do nothing for acceleration.
candude is offline  
Old 10-14-2013, 07:55 PM
  #402  
USN Retired 1992-2012
 
mrgooden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia
Posts: 979
Received 243 Likes on 122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by candude
The 22" wheels on that Limited do nothing for acceleration.
Mine accelerates very nicely.

Richard
mrgooden is offline  
Old 10-14-2013, 07:57 PM
  #403  
Senior Member
 
Burns331's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 672
Received 51 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

They make a big difference. I can tell a serious difference between my dads with factory 17's and my 20's. Everything else on the trucks is identical.
Burns331 is offline  
Old 10-20-2013, 12:04 AM
  #404  
Inebriated 4 ur safety
Thread Starter
 
Al Kohalic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,524
Received 894 Likes on 483 Posts
Default

Al Kohalic is offline  
Old 10-20-2013, 05:16 PM
  #405  
Senior Member
 
SultanGris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 7,877
Received 366 Likes on 284 Posts
Default

I got my truck to tow and to look good, not to race, if your worried about half a second acceleration difference you got the wrong vehicle son, lol! The 24s on my 150 were sweet. 17s look like crap, lol! Anything smaller than 20s just look out of place in the huge wheel wells on these trucks.
SultanGris is offline  
Old 10-20-2013, 05:26 PM
  #406  
Senior Member
 
RES4CUE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Manassas Va
Posts: 9,300
Received 1,523 Likes on 1,203 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SultanGris
I got my truck to tow and to look good, not to race, if your worried about half a second acceleration difference you got the wrong vehicle son, lol! The 24s on my 150 were sweet. 17s look like crap, lol! Anything smaller than 20s just look out of place in the huge wheel wells on these trucks.
That's why you put big meats on the 17's!

To me, anything larger than 20's without being dropped looks like *** especially when your truck is confused about what it wants to be.
RES4CUE is offline  
Old 10-20-2013, 08:40 PM
  #407  
USN Retired 1992-2012
 
mrgooden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia
Posts: 979
Received 243 Likes on 122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RES4CUE

That's why you put big meats on the 17's!

To me, anything larger than 20's without being dropped looks like *** especially when your truck is confused about what it wants to be.
I do not know to think about my stock 22s then. LoL.

Richard
mrgooden is offline  
Old 10-20-2013, 11:41 PM
  #408  
Senior Member
 
SultanGris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 7,877
Received 366 Likes on 284 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RES4CUE

That's why you put big meats on the 17's!

To me, anything larger than 20's without being dropped looks like *** especially when your truck is confused about what it wants to be.
Sure if you actually go mudding, but it looks gayer than a bag of dicks on a street Queen plus they are loud and annoying on the highway if you drive a lot, lol! I drive 25000 a year and my 20s are more than capable for anything I find offroad.
SultanGris is offline  
Old 10-21-2013, 01:18 AM
  #409  
Member
 
brianford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 60
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I live in Colorado and tow boats, snowmobiles, lumber, horses, and other crap up similar grade regularly. Like once or twice a week minimum. 7k+ altitude, 3-5% grade in Southern Colorado.

This vid makes me wanna jump off a bridge. Or execute a Ford executive w/ a 50 cal. One or the other.


I dropped 60 on a raptor, their top of the line truck. And they wouldn't let me get it in an ecoboost. So that means have about 30 % less towing ability at altitude than my friend who bought a 30k f150.

Thanks ford.

PS, all your fake concern about the environment is highlighted in the raptor as well. I have no idea how many raptors you sell but I assume a lot. All of us get 3-8 mpg less than we would get if we drove an ecoboost raptor...so all the phony mpg environmental love you pretend to show in other car models is nullified because the profit margin on the 6.2 is higher than eco so you don't give us an eco raptor.

Head to the Raptor forums Ford. 18/20 of us would pay more for an Ecoboost if it was an option, it would help the environment, help solidify the reputation of the ecoboost...and you don't care. Bc the margins are lower than the 6.2 (good friend fairly high up in ford confirmed this suspicion).
Shameful stuff, Ford.

I love everything about the Raptor but the engine. To be honest as a Raptor owner, I don't know if I can ever forgive Ford completely for smacking us customers in the mouth via engine option. I thought I could when I bought the truck since everything about it is so amazing.

But it's tough to swallow having such a drastically inferior engine..particularly at altitude where it officially SUCKS compared to eco in towing, speed, mpg, everything.

But at least 80 year old Raptor owners who grew up in a previous generation/can't accept new technology can appreciate the engine noise of a V8 w/ 1980's technology... *sigh*...

Last edited by brianford; 10-21-2013 at 01:23 AM.
brianford is offline  
Old 10-21-2013, 06:43 AM
  #410  
Senior Member
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

I am so confused by this post I can't even tell if its serious.
engineermike is online now  
The following 2 users liked this post by engineermike:
crockett56 (10-21-2013), Theocoog (10-21-2013)


Quick Reply: Fast Lane Truck: Ecoboost vs i-Force vs Ecotec



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:19 AM.