Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

F150 coil spring rates and net height gain with bilsteins

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-2017, 03:04 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
THEGAW's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default F150 coil spring rates and net height gain with bilsteins

First of all, what's up guys, by my post count you can see I'm new here. I've done a ton of looking around here and over on ecoboost forum.

I really hate to beat this dead horse but I'm looking for specific bilstein info that I haven't seen examined from this angle.

As far as I've found there are basically 2 coil spring codes for the front of the 09-14 trucks. UU and VV. I've got V code coils on my '13 FX4 crew eco "145.

I've got bilsteins I'm going to install soon and I'm torn on top setting or 1 down. From my perspective somewhere between the 1.5" and 2.25 would be perfect. I've seen varying net height gains at the same setting and I'm curious if this is due the the coil spring code installed on the strut.

First of all can anyone confirm that the VV code coils are heavier rate than the UU coils? I'm thinking they are. If this is true, then by logic I might assume that preloading a VV coil the same distance as a UU coil would gain me slightly more lift say at the 1.5" setting because the coil won't compress as much under the vehicle weight. Does this make sense logically to you guys also.

What height gains did you guys measure at the second from top setting and with what coil code?
Old 05-15-2017, 04:11 PM
  #2  
Crotchety Old Man
 
GrasslandHVAC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 355
Received 60 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

I have a 3.7 scab and the UU spring code. I would assume the VV is heavier rate.
Old 05-15-2017, 06:08 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
flamehead16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 3,209
Received 125 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

most run on 2nd to top setting as the top setting may cause binding.
Old 05-15-2017, 09:40 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
antony1103's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 645
Received 127 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

I've been trying to hunt down an answer for a while now. I'd love to know the stock spring rates.
Old 05-15-2017, 10:08 PM
  #5  
Member
 
TexJ3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 93
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I read somewhere they were around 400-450 lbs/in, but I never verified.
Old 05-16-2017, 10:17 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
THEGAW's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TexJ3
I read somewhere they were around 400-450 lbs/in, but I never verified.
For which code? U or V?
Old 05-16-2017, 10:35 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
antony1103's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 645
Received 127 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TexJ3
I read somewhere they were around 400-450 lbs/in, but I never verified.
I've heard something similar, but again, nothing verified...

I'd like to start experimenting with different spring rates/lengths, but I need to know what I have to begin with first...
Old 05-16-2017, 12:14 PM
  #8  
2014 FX4 EcoScrew
 
RedAggie03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 452
Received 48 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

One spring is for the 3750 GVW vehicles and the other are for the 3900 GVW rated vehicles.

User HSBII has swapped springs with 5100's for this reason...You might reach out to him, he came up with a very clever solution of spring rates, 5100's, and Raptor top hats/spacers.
Old 05-16-2017, 02:41 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Kytann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 694
Received 92 Likes on 73 Posts

Default

When I looked up the information years ago the best I could come up with was between 500-550 lbs/in.
I think the 400-450 lbs/in rating is for the newer 2015+ truck and their lower weight.

It would be cool to see that data for the actual spring rates. My new Fox 2.0 Coilovers at 650 lbs/in feel noticeably stiffer than stock, but interestingly not harsher.
I need to flex the suspension out to check the balance front to rear.
Old 05-16-2017, 04:12 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
THEGAW's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the insight.

Just knowing that the v code spring is a little heavier I have to assume it may yield a little more than the advertised 1.5" at the second from top. The 5100 install instructions even say that various factors affect the overall lift provided at the different settings. I imagine spring rate has to be one of those factors.

Was hoping people who have done bilsteins with different spring codes would chime in with the real world results they got. Anyone?


Quick Reply: F150 coil spring rates and net height gain with bilsteins



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:03 AM.