Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: What is your real world ECOBOOST mileage?
Avg Above 20mpg: 4x4
5.10%
Avg Above 20mpg: 4x2
5.10%
Avg 17-19mpg: 4x4
38.78%
Avg 17-19mpg: 4x2
5.10%
Avg 13-17mpg: 4x4
40.82%
Avg 13-17mpg: 4x2
1.02%
Avg Below 12mpg: 4x4
3.06%
Avg Below 12mpg: 4x2
1.02%
Voters: 98. You may not vote on this poll

ECOBOOST Mileage-Real World Pole

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2012, 12:30 AM
  #21  
Member
 
seniorjumper82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Dothan, AL
Posts: 86
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

When I was at the dealer having my leveling kit and new tires installed I actually got to talk to one of the Ford Techs. He said for some reason just about all the trucks with the Ecoboost when they hit around 15K miles, that it comes alive. He said alot of owners come in and complain that something is wrong with their truck, because they say it has more power than before, and that it's finally getting better mpg. Now, I'm just 10K shy of 15K so i'll be interested to see if I have the same problem. I also added a drop in K&N air filter, hoping that I might see at least 1 mpg better.

Jason
Old 10-29-2012, 12:35 AM
  #22  
King Ranchin' Member
Thread Starter
 
24packman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina/Raleigh, North Carolin
Posts: 1,125
Received 63 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eye.surgeon
30k miles a year...ask yourself really hard if you need a half ton truck for what you do. Because you could save a few thousand a year by driving a car.
True, I actually looked at the new Taurus SHOs. Then I thought, can I offroad in this... nope, can I pull my 7,000lb boat... nope, can I load up hay in the bed of it... nope, can I afford 2 vehicles right now... NOPE! Haha, Its kinda an occupational hazard combined with being a college student as well as driving everywhere doing design jobs.
Old 10-29-2012, 07:56 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
bradyb093's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Jennings,LA
Posts: 116
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

16.9 Lifetime MPG. 17.5 MPG over last 5000 miles. Best tank 20.25 MPG(hand calculated), all highway. Average HWY tank 18 MPG. Average City tank 14 MPG(hand calculated). 10,800 trouble free miles on my truck.
Old 10-29-2012, 09:37 AM
  #24  
FX4 SCrew TT'd V6
 
mrpositraction's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 1,999
Received 125 Likes on 91 Posts

Default

38,000 total so far

16.9mpg life average

Best mileage recorded was 22mpg over a 250 mile trip (got this numerous times) @ 65mph

Towing mileage pulling 7000 lbs I got about 10-12mpg (and this is over the Appalachian mtns)

Towing mileage with a 6x10 trailer and 1600# Can Am Commander with full windshield I get about 14mpg

I had a 2010 5.4L FX4 (same trim as what I got now) and I never got this good of mileage. I easily get 2-3mpg better across the board with this truck.
Old 10-29-2012, 09:45 AM
  #25  
King Ranchin' Member
Thread Starter
 
24packman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina/Raleigh, North Carolin
Posts: 1,125
Received 63 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mrpositraction
38,000 total so far

16.9mpg life average

Best mileage recorded was 22mpg over a 250 mile trip (got this numerous times) @ 65mph

Towing mileage pulling 7000 lbs I got about 10-12mpg (and this is over the Appalachian mtns) Would this have been better if it was on level ground?

Towing mileage with a 6x10 trailer and 1600# Can Am Commander with full windshield I get about 14mpg

I had a 2010 5.4L FX4 (same trim as what I got now) and I never got this good of mileage. I easily get 2-3mpg better across the board with this truck.
What year model? 4x4?
Old 10-29-2012, 11:15 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
eye.surgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Central California
Posts: 1,166
Received 251 Likes on 137 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 24packman
True, I actually looked at the new Taurus SHOs. Then I thought, can I offroad in this... nope, can I pull my 7,000lb boat... nope, can I load up hay in the bed of it... nope, can I afford 2 vehicles right now... NOPE! Haha, Its kinda an occupational hazard combined with being a college student as well as driving everywhere doing design jobs.
Two new F150s while a college student? College must be different than in my day
Old 10-29-2012, 11:54 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
gwpfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Nevada
Posts: 512
Received 51 Likes on 42 Posts

Default

Briefed this but your missing far too much information for this to even be a reasonable poll.

1. Cab type
2. Gear ratio
3. Bed Length
4. Tow package, dumbo mirrors?
5. Stock tires and wheels?
6. other stock accessories, added weight
7. other non-stock accessories, added weight/wind resistance
8. Tuner?
9. others I may have missed

At least if you got the top 7 then you'd have a reasonable poll, even if you added stock to some of the options...

Yep my 4.x4 3.73 heavy loaded Lariat SCREW is around 16.5, while my buddies 4x4 3.31 SCAB basic XLT is 21.5. Oh and I change appox. 1600' in elevation on my drive to work.
Old 10-29-2012, 12:16 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
HunterSmitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 762
Received 88 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

gwpfan is right, too many variables.

To the OP, stock 2010 with the 5.4L will be ~1-2mpg less than an equally equipped Ecoboost.

Compared to your 2010 with that lift/tires, I would think the new truck will give you close 5MPG better than your current one, but its just a guess. It really depends what kind of driving you do. But stock for stock, the new engines aren't miracle workers compared to the 4.6L and 5.4L engines in 2009/2010.

I've gone from a 2008 4.6L Screw and averaged 15.5MPG in my conditions. I went to a 2011 Ecoboost with the 3.31 rear and averaged 17.0MPG. I then went to the 2012 5.0L with the 3.73 rear and average is 16.9MPG over the life of it.

I don't think a poll is going to help you much, unless the drivers have gone from a similar setup to what you currently have and can provide a comparison. You shouldn't go in expecting to gain 10MPG because some owners are reporting 22MPG on hwy at 60mph.
Old 10-29-2012, 12:28 PM
  #29  
King Ranchin' Member
Thread Starter
 
24packman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina/Raleigh, North Carolin
Posts: 1,125
Received 63 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Well yes, but this is a general question. I am taking into account that people have different mods. I'm considering it a general average, you're only allowed to do 12 choices per poll.
Old 10-29-2012, 01:50 PM
  #30  
Member
 
mozy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

My father and I have identical trucks with the exception mine is a '10 with the 5.4 and his is an '11 with the EB. Same configuration, same gears, etc. With my driving style, I get about 5% higher in the EB on average. IMO, there is not enough difference in MPG between the two to justify the upgrade. However, if you are talking about power, there is a huge difference between them.


Quick Reply: ECOBOOST Mileage-Real World Pole



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:53 AM.