Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ecoboost has 385hp/430lb-ft with premium fuel.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2013, 03:27 PM
  #21  
Senior Member/Vietnam Vet
 
SkiSmuggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Northern Vermont
Posts: 2,603
Received 539 Likes on 369 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sterlingone
Yeah, I know.....me too....
Although I will say that I towed our 28 foot TT many thousands of miles last summer on regular fuel, and up to 7,000 feet altitude on some mountain passes, and it seemed to do fine...definitely am going to have to try 91 octane for towing this summer...maybe I CAN get better than 8.5 mpg!!!
I got less than 10 on 89 octane and 11 with 93 octane. I've never towed with 87 octane, but run it all winter. I do run the Livernois tow tunes - 87 tune with 93 octane yielded about 10 mpg, 89 tune with 89 octane was 9.5-10 with 89 octane and 11mpg with 93 octane. This summer I will run the 91 tow tune with 91/93 gas. I am towing a fifth wheel which has better aero. All towing is at 60mph on the interstates.
Old 03-27-2013, 09:58 AM
  #22  
Junior Member
 
PhillyLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Centexguy
Not buying it until someone puts it on a dyno or makes some 1/4 mile passes. I've run premium and it felt the same and mileage didn't change.
They did it with the N/A 3.7 Mustang AND the 5.0.

Ford's timing tables from 2011+ vehicles on are EXTREMELY aggressive. The engine management will increase timing until it senses knock, and then pull back. Then keep on doing it until the most hp is achieved (along with other variables).

I see no reason why this isn't at least plausible if not true on the F150's as well.
Old 03-27-2013, 11:21 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Centexguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,398
Received 130 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

Plausible yes. Do you have the graphs or link for the tests done on the mustang?
Old 03-27-2013, 11:36 AM
  #24  
Member
 
1800Beatdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 210
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

People actually put regular octane in thier EB? Always thought that this engine required premium fuel, as with all other turbo engines usually do. That just the way it always been for me; if it has a turbo or s/c, it needs premium/ higher grade fuel.
Old 03-27-2013, 11:51 AM
  #25  
On more meds than ymeski

 
my67falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The most famous town you have never heard of.
Posts: 26,075
Received 651 Likes on 379 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1800Beatdown
People actually put regular octane in thier EB? Always thought that this engine required premium fuel, as with all other turbo engines usually do. That just the way it always been for me; if it has a turbo or s/c, it needs premium/ higher grade fuel.
Nope. The Eco is built to run on 87. It just runs a bit faster on 91 :-)
Old 03-27-2013, 12:26 PM
  #26  
Junior Member
 
PhillyLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Centexguy
Plausible yes. Do you have the graphs or link for the tests done on the mustang?
http://youtu.be/adSx7MGTecE



It's not plausible for the 3.7's. It's a fact. 93 octane in the Mustang motors, both 5.0 and 3.7 will net you more power.

I have no doubt it's the same for the trucks.
Old 03-27-2013, 01:31 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Loosescrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 227
Received 24 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

I know that 5.0 Mustang talk is a bit off topic here but one of the major Mustang tuners did a dyno run of a 5.0 on 87 octane, drained the tank and then ran a 93 octane dyno run. The 93 octane gave it a 10 horsepower increase.
Old 03-27-2013, 01:45 PM
  #28  
On more meds than ymeski

 
my67falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The most famous town you have never heard of.
Posts: 26,075
Received 651 Likes on 379 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PhillyLS1

http://youtu.be/adSx7MGTecE

It's not plausible for the 3.7's. It's a fact. 93 octane in the Mustang motors, both 5.0 and 3.7 will net you more power.

I have no doubt it's the same for the trucks.
I thought I read 377HP and 390 TQ with E85 in the 5.0l
Old 03-27-2013, 01:48 PM
  #29  
On more meds than ymeski

 
my67falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The most famous town you have never heard of.
Posts: 26,075
Received 651 Likes on 379 Posts

Default

375 HP.

http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2010/09...5-ethanol.html
Old 03-27-2013, 03:41 PM
  #30  
Member
 
2010fordman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 89
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PhillyLS1

They did it with the N/A 3.7 Mustang AND the 5.0.

Ford's timing tables from 2011+ vehicles on are EXTREMELY aggressive. The engine management will increase timing until it senses knock, and then pull back. Then keep on doing it until the most hp is achieved (along with other variables).

I see no reason why this isn't at least plausible if not true on the F150's as well.

Wow that is some smart engines


Quick Reply: Ecoboost has 385hp/430lb-ft with premium fuel.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:34 PM.