Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ecoboost finally comes thru on expectations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-2011, 04:34 PM
  #41  
FX4 SCrew TT'd V6
 
mrpositraction's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 1,999
Received 125 Likes on 91 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by demarco5
pay more attention in physics class.

edit: mass*gravity = lb force, not lb mass so it would be force*dist=torque


Don't worry about the breakdown of what put your truck together, I'm sure the engineers at ford disregarded it as well
So I was right (in the joke that should be taken as a joke)

TQ is how far you take the wall with you

I did just fine in physics class
Old 04-21-2011, 04:41 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
OmahaEcoBoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mrpositraction
If you anything short of 100% throttle, you will not see your dyno results. 400ft lbs, unless, you are able to lock your gear while driving, you won't see this as you will down shift and jump up in rpm.

Turbos will spool within a couple hundred rpms from steady state.
So you're saying that when I normally drive around with my RPMs consistently between say 1,200 and 1,700 RPMs, I'm not getting the 325-385 or so of torque as indicated by this chart in steady state?
Old 04-21-2011, 04:55 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
TruckLarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,268
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by demarco5
pay more attention in physics class.

edit: mass*gravity = lb force, not lb mass so it would be force*dist=torque


Don't worry about the breakdown of what put your truck together, I'm sure the engineers at ford disregarded it as well
The only physics I know is LED's do not emit light, they suck darkness...
Old 04-21-2011, 04:56 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
TruckLarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,268
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mrpositraction
If you anything short of 100% throttle, you will not see your dyno results. 400ft lbs, unless, you are able to lock your gear while driving, you won't see this as you will down shift and jump up in rpm.

Turbos will spool within a couple hundred rpms from steady state.
These are also very lightweight twin turbos, which as I understand all but eliminate turbo lag.

I sure don't detect any.
Old 04-21-2011, 04:57 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
Thunderslide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by OmahaEcoBoost
So you're saying that when I normally drive around with my RPMs consistently between say 1,200 and 1,700 RPMs, I'm not getting the 325-385 or so of torque as indicated by this chart in steady state?
do you think it takes 325-385 TQ to maintain speed when a 5.4 only produces that same amount. if you out put was that all the time you would have to hold the brakes on to keep it form going as fast as it can.

In other words if it is producing it where is it going if not to the wheels.

when my 5.4 produces max tq it is gaining speed, when it is producing less I don't gain speed.
Old 04-21-2011, 05:53 PM
  #46  
Member
 
bigal1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm new to this but I suspect that when you are just cruising around town at a steady speed the turbos aren't doing anything. When you put your foot down they will kick in. It's nice to have available and also nice to not use it all the time and waste fuel.
The small displacement of this engine helps to save on fuel use.
Al
Old 04-22-2011, 05:20 AM
  #47  
Junior Member
 
daveo987's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zero419
The cost to build Vs. output of a windmill is underwhelming.
Add in the cost of repairs (I live near 50 HUGE windmills and those things are always going down) and all it adds up to is and expensive advertising stunt for the power company.
You got it right, off cape cod they putting in a wind farm, cost per kwh estimated at 25 cent vs current cost in that state of around 6 cents, & thats after 600mill of Fed taxpayer money.

I put in solar a few years ago, assuming NOTHING breaks for 26 years it will have paid for itself.
Old 04-22-2011, 07:53 AM
  #48  
FX4 SCrew TT'd V6
 
mrpositraction's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 1,999
Received 125 Likes on 91 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OmahaEcoBoost
So you're saying that when I normally drive around with my RPMs consistently between say 1,200 and 1,700 RPMs, I'm not getting the 325-385 or so of torque as indicated by this chart in steady state?
Yes, you are only making enough torque to maintain pushing your vehicle down the road, through the air.

Think of it this way. If an engine is making more torque than it needs it speeds up, if it isn't making enough torque, it slows down. This works from idle to redline.

Originally Posted by bigal1234
I'm new to this but I suspect that when you are just cruising around town at a steady speed the turbos aren't doing anything. When you put your foot down they will kick in. It's nice to have available and also nice to not use it all the time and waste fuel.
The small displacement of this engine helps to save on fuel use.
Al
Turbo are cool, but they are not magic. Driving around, they are actually doing something. You will see 0 bar/psi (atmospheric pressure) most of the time while cruising. In an NA motor, you would never see this (unless you have a intake tube, filter, and intake made by Jesus). At idle, with no load, you will see very similar to an NA motor (22" of vacuum say). So at 0 bar/psi, you engine is actually a little more efficient on the intake side of things because of less resistance in the intake track, but on the exhaust side of things, there is a little more resistance to push the exhaust out (this is the parasitic loss of a turbo, yes, there is some). So driving around like a normal person, the turbo does very little (although, it is very hard to accelerate and not get into 3-4psi, this motor is set up very diesel like, my little Super Duty )

Hope this helps clarify a little bit, I am no expert, but I have played with cars quite a bit, from little turbos (this being the smallest), to larger 98mm turbos, from single to twin to sequential. They all have their pluses and minuses. I have alway like the twin setups, and Ford has done a great job setting this up. If they went bigger with the turbos and left a bunch of power on the table, we would all be experiencing turbo lag more than we are now. This is how a perfectly setup trubo system should run for a daily driven truck. A sports car, some would expect more lag, but in return, you would have more upper end.
Old 04-22-2011, 09:00 AM
  #49  
Member
 
bigal1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the info.
Al
Old 04-23-2011, 11:23 PM
  #50  
Member
 
the_slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 96
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FLA-SVT
What everyone seems to forget is that the max torque and horsepower rating are at wide open throttle...you think you are going to get 20+ MPG's at WOT? It takes fuel to make power and torque. They get great mileage when empty or pulling VERY light loads. But when pulling heavy loads, as proven in several tests, they are very thirsty like ANY other motor. Power demand = fuel consumption. The EB when pulling a 9000lb load got 7.2 mpg's (Car and Driver test). If you are pulling trailers and heavy loads every day, why would you buy and EB? If not, then it might be the perfect motor for your application. But if you bought the F-150 and are going to use it for a truck and have a trailer behind it most of the time......
Yes, all HP and Torque ratings are at WOT. I don't think anyone ever tests or rates one at 1/8 throttle, 1/4 throttle, etc.
Never stated that I, or any EcoBoost, was going to get 20+mpg at WOT.
Most trucks do not pull heavy loads or trailors every day. Most are used as daily drivers, commuter vehicles, the new family car. So "yes", the VERY light loads (where most F150's are used, look at any Wal-Mart parking lot - there will be 20 full sized pickups with empty beds) make it a great choice.
Never stated that I, or any EcoBoost, was going to get 20+mpg pulling a heavy load. Most of us except the we will use more fuel to move more weight. It just nice to know that for 90% or more of the time, I'll get good mileage.


Quick Reply: Ecoboost finally comes thru on expectations



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:17 AM.