Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Do I really need a catch can??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-2014, 04:18 PM
  #11  
Keepin' the lights on!
 
Watt-maker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: BFE, NM
Posts: 1,759
Received 229 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

True. A catch can plumbed between the crankcase vent and driver side turbo will not completely stop the condensation issue. On some trucks, however, it will help. The liquid that was in the driver side catch can is exactly what is building up in the CAC on my truck. The liquid is thin like water, smells of gas, looks like snot, and has a very small amount of oil in it. If one were to drive in such a way that produced more of this mixture vs. other drivers, I could see how this could give the same symptoms as the condensation issue without being in an environment that is capable of actually producing condensation. I also partly blame this mixture ( and sub-zero temps) as the reason the OEM CAC cracked and split at the bottom in Dec. 2012. If your truck does not produce this mixture then maybe catch cans would be an unnecessary purchase.

This week I'm hoping to have time to remove and clean out the CAC and all intake piping. I'm also going to drill a weep hole in the CAC. This will tell me how well ( or not) the catch can is working and hopefully I will never get to experience the condensation issue.
The following users liked this post:
benelli_t (01-22-2014)
Old 01-20-2014, 04:22 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Left Plate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: West of the East
Posts: 9,772
Received 100 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

If you took about 10 minutes to study the plumbing on the EcoBoost, it should become more clear? I gave sources previously that you will find give a very good explanation if you care to take the time to check it out?
Old 01-20-2014, 04:54 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
packplantpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,964
Received 584 Likes on 404 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Left Plate
If you took about 10 minutes to study the plumbing on the EcoBoost, it should become more clear? I gave sources previously that you will find give a very good explanation if you care to take the time to check it out?
I've looked through the sources. I don't see much supporting the claim. And I've looked at the plumbing pretty well.

I just don't believe the catch can accumulation is related to the cac condensation problems. Blowby valve buildup via the pcv system is a chronic condition and can be prevented by the catch can . Cac condensation is an acute problem caused by water condensing in the cac suddenly being sucked in. Nothing about this catch can will prevent the acute problem.

That doesn't make it a bad idea to protect the intake from blow by. But I have seen no compelling evidence that it can treat the condensation problems and suspect it is slick marketing to increase sales from fear.

I might be convinced that the oil in the cac is acting as a nucleating agent that promotes condensation accumulation . But nobody has made that argument and I'm unsure if it could be true.
Old 01-20-2014, 06:03 PM
  #14  
Member
 
EcoboostedFX4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: RVA
Posts: 36
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Would it be possible to run both sides to a single catch can via t-fittings?

Or would it not be possible due to the passenger side being pcv all the time and the driver's side only acting as a pcv under boost conditions?
Old 01-20-2014, 06:27 PM
  #15  
Keepin' the lights on!
 
Watt-maker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: BFE, NM
Posts: 1,759
Received 229 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

It might be possible using check valves. IMHO, it's best to keep those lines separate. I'm not saying it's the only way, just the way I prefer to use the cans.
Old 01-20-2014, 06:29 PM
  #16  
Boost :)
 
TJPlatinumEB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 2,329
Received 440 Likes on 328 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by EcoboostedFX4
Would it be possible to run both sides to a single catch can via t-fittings?

Or would it not be possible due to the passenger side being pcv all the time and the driver's side only acting as a pcv under boost conditions?
There are catch cans that are setup to run one can off of both valve covers. I don't know exactly how the EB system works so I can't speak to how it would be hooked up, but they do exist.

I have run one in my Supra in the past and it has two ports on the top for the valve covers, baffling inside, and then one port on the bottom as the source for vaccuum from the intake track.
Old 01-20-2014, 07:09 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
taubr unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 180
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I wouldnt run a pcv style at all personally. Id naturally vent the crank case to a catch can and just close off the intake side of it all together. Works on all the race cars iv been around and built, and yes majority of them are turbo cars . Just my $0.02
Old 01-20-2014, 08:20 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
whizkidder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 135
Received 87 Likes on 42 Posts

Default

UPR can. 5000 miles.
Attached Thumbnails Do I really need a catch can??-image-719151991.jpg  
Old 01-20-2014, 08:42 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Left Plate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: West of the East
Posts: 9,772
Received 100 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by packplantpath
I've looked through the sources. I don't see much supporting the claim. And I've looked at the plumbing pretty well.

I just don't believe the catch can accumulation is related to the cac condensation problems. Blowby valve buildup via the pcv system is a chronic condition and can be prevented by the catch can . Cac condensation is an acute problem caused by water condensing in the cac suddenly being sucked in. Nothing about this catch can will prevent the acute problem.

That doesn't make it a bad idea to protect the intake from blow by. But I have seen no compelling evidence that it can treat the condensation problems and suspect it is slick marketing to increase sales from fear.

I might be convinced that the oil in the cac is acting as a nucleating agent that promotes condensation accumulation . But nobody has made that argument and I'm unsure if it could be true.
IDK what sources you are looking at, so I will try to provide some links.
Moisture does not automatically appear, it is always present, my point is to capture it before it can condense!
Start here

http://www.f150ecotuning.com

http://www.revxtreme.com/index.php?r...=17&news_id=21

http://www.revxtreme.com/index.php?r...=17&news_id=20
Old 01-20-2014, 09:53 PM
  #20  
International man of Myst
 
LastResort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 667
Received 166 Likes on 103 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Left Plate
IDK what sources you are looking at, so I will try to provide some links.
Moisture does not automatically appear, it is always present, my point is to capture it before it can condense!
Start here

http://www.f150ecotuning.com

http://www.revxtreme.com/index.php?r...=17&news_id=21

http://www.revxtreme.com/index.php?r...=17&news_id=20
You to seemed to be confused. The links you provided advocate that a working evacuation systems prevents condensation inside the engine and causing oil contamination. We have that in the vehicle. The addition of the catch can prevents these from being injected into your intake and negatively affecting octane/cause detonation. I'm sure some of it condenses in the intake but that's not necessarily relevant in this discussion: for the catch can to work the gasses must condense there.

I don't think you're talking about he CAC condensation that results in shudder/poop-my-pants problems that everyone is discussing these days.


Quick Reply: Do I really need a catch can??



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07 AM.