Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Catch can sample results!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 14, 2014 | 10:07 PM
  #1  
Z7What's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,135
Likes: 885
From: New Orleans, LA
Default Catch can sample results!

Here is the results from my UPR catch can. The can was emptied at 3 different time to get the amount needed to send off.

Catch can sample results!-image-817640843.jpg

Wayne
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2014 | 10:50 PM
  #2  
flamehead16's Avatar
5 Year Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,209
Likes: 125
From: Norman, OK
Default

to small to read even if i click on it
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2014 | 11:00 PM
  #3  
Sweatmachine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 874
Likes: 175
From: Blanco, TX
Default

Pardon me, but it seems like the verdict is there is no verdict. Sort of useless info unless you have something to compare it to. No offense intended.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2014 | 11:21 PM
  #4  
130428's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 711
From: Calgary, AB
Default

"We're not entirely sure what we should be finding here"... written right on it!

that kind of says it all

kidding, " I " have no idea what should or shouldn't be in there!
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2014 | 12:36 AM
  #5  
blueovelboy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 72
From: bay area
Default

if you could type it so we could read it, it might help and where is the control to compare it to?
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2014 | 12:41 AM
  #6  
Manuellabour247's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,059
Likes: 396
From: Kansas
Default

Looks like they are essentially comparing it to an average oil sample for your year of truck. I can see why, but I'm not sure they are confident enough to claim that. Numbers don't look too bad compared to a normal oil sample, but then again this is a catch can sample. Interesting to see that there is no water showing in the report.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2014 | 12:46 AM
  #7  
LastResort's Avatar
International man of Myst
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 667
Likes: 166
From: PNW
Default

Originally Posted by Manuellabour247
Interesting to see that there is no water showing in the report.
Interesting doesn't even cover it. Mother****ing epic LOLs, maybe. At this point, I think it's safe to say that whatever solution the catch can provides, it's not doing what the seller claims.

Hilariously epic, these results.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2014 | 01:15 AM
  #8  
Sweatmachine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 874
Likes: 175
From: Blanco, TX
Default

Originally Posted by LastResort
Interesting doesn't even cover it. Mother****ing epic LOLs, maybe. At this point, I think it's safe to say that whatever solution the catch can provides, it's not doing what the seller claims.

Hilariously epic, these results.
I'll bet the contents of the catch can would be wildly different on a turbocharged direct injected engine. OP is running a 5.0
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2014 | 02:43 AM
  #9  
Manuellabour247's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,059
Likes: 396
From: Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by Sweatmachine

I'll bet the contents of the catch can would be wildly different on a turbocharged direct injected engine. OP is running a 5.0
I'm not sure it would be much different. Maybe a higher fuel dilution in the oil, but other than that it should be close.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2014 | 03:54 AM
  #10  
Z7What's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,135
Likes: 885
From: New Orleans, LA
Default

I am very surprised not to see any water in the sample. I will see if I can make it bigger. I'll also post the info of the engine oil I had tested a whe back.

Wayne
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:25 PM.