Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Can smart charge be disabled?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2017, 10:05 PM
  #81  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Lee308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 826
Received 127 Likes on 109 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WXman
The problem is, FEW people know about the BMS including dealership technicians. I think this is because it's such a ridiculous system that serves absolutely no true benefit whatsoever that nobody would ever even assume that something like that would be a "feature" on a truck.

There is no telling how many dealership service visits there have been related to this system because people (and some dealers) don't even realize that the truck is designed to do this.
Just a bump,,, you are correct. Ford screwed the pooch with this crap.

Last edited by Lee308; 06-29-2017 at 10:17 PM.
Old 06-30-2017, 05:03 PM
  #82  
Member

 
RLXXI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Big Easy
Posts: 26,680
Received 6,199 Likes on 4,672 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Lee308
"The load shed operation, go read it again, and again and again until you understand how it works. It's reducing the load on the entire electrical system saving otherwise lost voltage the alternator would have to make up for."

I disagree, it is NOT reducing load, it is reducing the charge to the battery.
Its that simple.
These trucks are running around with 80% charge to the battery to save .0000000000000000000001 MPG.

""They even told us straight up that a vehicle would roll off the line with a known defective part because it's cheaper to pay us in the field to fix it than stop the assembly line. How's that for a slap in the face? """
Which is the reason I wish I had never sold my old 1995 F150. My 2013 is junk.
Originally Posted by Ricktwuhk
Just sell your truck and end your misery.
You have been given the solution.
.
Old 07-04-2017, 12:38 AM
  #83  
Senior Member
 
PerryB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Chico, Ca.
Posts: 4,574
Received 964 Likes on 742 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Lee308
My 2013 is junk.
My 2013 rocks.
Old 07-04-2017, 08:24 AM
  #84  
Member

 
RLXXI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Big Easy
Posts: 26,680
Received 6,199 Likes on 4,672 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PerryB
My 2013 rocks.
Ditto!!
.
Old 07-05-2017, 12:02 AM
  #85  
Senior Member
 
STingray1300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,462
Received 698 Likes on 442 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PerryB
My 2013 rocks.
Yo! Here...
Old 07-05-2017, 01:51 AM
  #86  
Senior Member
 
SoonerLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 519
Received 66 Likes on 57 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PerryB
My 2013 rocks.
Aside from the lousy factory pads/rotors and the water pump that failed catastrophically at less than 70K miles, my '13 has been the most trouble-free vehicle I've owned. I plan on seeing if it lives up to Ford's 250K mile durability testing.
Old 07-05-2017, 08:03 AM
  #87  
Senior Member
 
WXman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,504
Received 310 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

My 2013 rocks too. But that doesn't mean there isn't some really stupid engineering in these trucks that does absolutely nothing beneficial.

With the BMS system disconnected, my truck starts just as quickly as it did before. So there's no difference that the starter motor can see. And I'm not worried about the alternator because it's there for the purpose of charging the battery. I'd rather have full battery capacity. Fuel economy? We've already talked about that. Zero benefit to this system. But lots of headaches with it.

Just like the vacuum hubs...just another failure point that the competition doesn't have and they all get the same highway MPGs that we do.

I love my truck. That doesn't mean it's perfect.
Old 07-05-2017, 09:21 PM
  #88  
Senior Member
 
Deerhunter4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 889
Received 54 Likes on 48 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WXman
My 2013 rocks too. But that doesn't mean there isn't some really stupid engineering in these trucks that does absolutely nothing beneficial.

With the BMS system disconnected, my truck starts just as quickly as it did before. So there's no difference that the starter motor can see. And I'm not worried about the alternator because it's there for the purpose of charging the battery. I'd rather have full battery capacity. Fuel economy? We've already talked about that. Zero benefit to this system. But lots of headaches with it.

Just like the vacuum hubs...just another failure point that the competition doesn't have and they all get the same highway MPGs that we do.

I love my truck. That doesn't mean it's perfect.
Couldn't agree more. I've also disconnected the sensor and now my truck doesn't drive me batty.
Old 10-14-2017, 06:24 PM
  #89  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Lee308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 826
Received 127 Likes on 109 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rnlcomp
I didn't see any mention of fuel savings in the principles of operation, the main thing I saw is that the alternator is turned off for faster cranking, which in turn by itself helps pro long battery and starter life, what's a new battery and starter cost these days? I know a battery is easily $100, starter? I'm really not in the mood to dig up prices, go search your self if you care to.

The load shed operation, go read it again, and again and again until you understand how it works. It's reducing the load on the entire electrical system saving otherwise lost voltage the alternator would have to make up for.

You don't understand it so you don't like it, I get that but for the majority of the truck driving world it's a non issue or shall I say your more intune to first world problems.

Batteries last longer, alternator lasts longer, starters last longer unless you happen to have one of those new trucks with start/stop technology, now that's where you start seeing more benefit but I digress.

Don't get me started on dealers and the tech's that no longer exist at most of them, I am very well familiar with the situation and it's sad but it's the manufacturers fault for screwing tech's with the unfair service labor time standards on warranty work.

They even told us straight up that a vehicle would roll off the line with a known defective part because it's cheaper to pay us in the field to fix it than stop the assembly line. How's that for a slap in the face?

Nearly every tech where I work now was a dealer tech from one brand or another, 3 of us from Ford, 4-6 from some type of GM dealer, 2 Dodge tech's, 2 Toyota, and 2 Lexus techs.

That's where we went, where we would get paid fairly!! Best I can tell you is if you find a dealer that has a seasoned tech, hold on with a death grip!
.
Well, I now have warped rotors on the front of my 2013 truck, 27k miles.
No hard stops or towing.
New technology sucks !
I want my 1995 F150 back!
Smart charge sucks !
Old 10-14-2017, 07:43 PM
  #90  
Member

 
RLXXI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Big Easy
Posts: 26,680
Received 6,199 Likes on 4,672 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Lee308
Well, I now have warped rotors on the front of my 2013 truck, 27k miles.
No hard stops or towing.
New technology sucks !
I want my 1995 F150 back!
Smart charge sucks !
Originally Posted by Ricktwuhk
Just sell your truck and end your misery.
..

Last edited by RLXXI; 10-14-2017 at 07:47 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by RLXXI:
dannytexas (10-31-2017), Ricktwuhk (10-14-2017)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:14 AM.