Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Is the 6.2L worth the $$$$

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2014, 10:43 AM
  #31  
OUTDRSMN
 
OUTDRSMN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Southern WV
Posts: 16
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I owned a 2004 Lariat Crew with the 5.4L, 4x4 for 7 yrs. I had a few "bugs" initially out of that motor. They were electronic though. Had new headers replaced under factory warranty and a whole list of various other issues throughout the life of ownership.
I now have a 2011 LIMITED with the 6.2L. I can not say enough about the 6.2. The old 5.4L has 315hp and the 6.2L has 411hp. The 6.2L is getting BETTER gas mileage than my 5.4L. I drive the same way to the same place of employment (22miles) every day. I never ever in 7yrs got more than 15mpg out of my 5.4L but on my first trip in my 6.2L i got 16.7mpg. On average I am getting 14.5mpg all the time out of my 6.2L. The newer motor is 6speed the older 5.4 is only 5. The newer motor has enough torque to pull hills in 6th gear on the interstate that would make my old 5.4 shift back one gear. I had the same rear end in both trucks making by the way. I pull a boat at around 2,800lbs with ease. The 6.2L is the way to go, who would not want 100more additional horsepower and better gas mileage.
Old 03-11-2014, 04:57 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
1994Vmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Ardmore Alberta
Posts: 1,164
Received 157 Likes on 124 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Z7What
I love my 5.0L but if the FX2 was available with the 6.2L I woulda bought it.

There's no replacement for displacement! I understand the 6.2L is old technology push rod motor vs the OHC 4V 5.0 but I still would have choose the 6.2L.


Wayne
The 6.2 is single overhead cam versus the 5 liter being dual overhead cam. Just because its design is somewhat older doesn't make it junk like some posters elude. The design of the 5.0 is awesome.... in a Mustang... Low end torque is a thing of the past with any v8 hence the ecoboost filling that void. The 6.2 pulls well though however even in that respect as well. That said I will take the older tech, out of date, antiquated engine that still has more power than the newer v8 option any day. And I did... and may buy more of them too.
Old 03-11-2014, 05:03 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Old Smoky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,362
Received 233 Likes on 158 Posts

Default

Worth the money IMO.
15K trouble free miles and it runs great!
Old 03-11-2014, 05:19 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Tanner2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 406
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Just turned 37,000 miles this week. Runs like brand new!



Quick Reply: Is the 6.2L worth the $$$$



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 AM.