Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.0 vs 5.7 hemi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2012, 03:55 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
dalonzo96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 5.0 vs 5.7 hemi

So i have heard mixed answers of what is the better motor. So what motor excels in what category? MPG? Towing? Acceleration? Top end? daily driving?
dalonzo96 is offline  
Old 11-23-2012, 04:34 PM
  #2  
One Bad MoFoMoCo Owner
 
sullyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 2,616
Received 394 Likes on 259 Posts

Default

Having come from a hemi Durango, and test driven a hemi truck before buying my 5.0, the Ford is better in all categories.

I have also heard rumors that the coyote will "outrun" the hemi on the street.

Last edited by sullyman; 11-23-2012 at 06:54 PM.
sullyman is offline  
Old 11-23-2012, 05:22 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
AppDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Regardless of HP numbers, just know that Dodge service is horrible. Stay with 5.0. Came from Dodge Hemi Durango as well. Loud, terrible gas mileage and poor customer service. I know my answer didn't answer your question but didn't want you to make the same mistake I did.
AppDawg is offline  
The following users liked this post:
09xltd (11-28-2012)
Old 11-23-2012, 06:10 PM
  #4  
FORD lifer
 
montanaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: The Quad Cities - relocated from Montana
Posts: 1,232
Received 246 Likes on 185 Posts

Default

I love my 5.0 -

The 5.0 gets better mileage, is smoother, has better throttle response, and is sportier.

The Hemi is thirstier, has more low-end torque, and horsepower to spare. It should, given you're comparing a 350 to a 302.
montanaman is offline  
Old 11-23-2012, 06:20 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Combat vet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: So Calif
Posts: 581
Received 166 Likes on 111 Posts

Default 5.0 is superior

I have a 5.0 in my 2012 F150 and it is bad ***! The R&D that went into the "coyote" motor is incredible. This dual overhead cammer likes to rev and pull hard and strong. I believe that Ford has under rated the HP just as they did back in the day with the 428 cobra jets. The gas mileage is excellent. I have gotten 21.3 highway and the average city/highway is 18.8. Use 91 octane and this motor screams. The motor is strong enough to accept an aftermarket supercharger that makes 525 hp without having to change any internal parts. As I said, this motor is bad to the bone.
Combat vet is offline  
Old 11-23-2012, 06:52 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
13Harleyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: El Paso Texas
Posts: 1,616
Received 163 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Combat vet
I have a 5.0 in my 2012 F150 and it is bad ***! The R&D that went into the "coyote" motor is incredible. This dual overhead cammer likes to rev and pull hard and strong. I believe that Ford has under rated the HP just as they did back in the day with the 428 cobra jets. The gas mileage is excellent. I have gotten 21.3 highway and the average city/highway is 18.8. Use 91 octane and this motor screams. The motor is strong enough to accept an aftermarket supercharger that makes 525 hp without having to change any internal parts. As I said, this motor is bad to the bone.
Since your raving about the 5.0 I want to ask a question, did you try out the Eco-boost and if so, how would you compare them? I had a 5.7 ram rental and was not impressed at all.
13Harleyfan is offline  
Old 11-23-2012, 09:05 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Combat vet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: So Calif
Posts: 581
Received 166 Likes on 111 Posts

Default 5.0 vs Eco

Originally Posted by 13Harleyfan
Since your raving about the 5.0 I want to ask a question, did you try out the Eco-boost and if so, how would you compare them? I had a 5.7 ram rental and was not impressed at all.
I did drive several Eco's with different rear end ratios. They are impressive in terms of low end torque and quick acceleration. Having had turbo cars and turbo diesel trucks in the past, I knew that when the turbo(s) spool up, the mileage drops. With 221 cubic inches, the Eco V6 would be spooling those turbos much of the time to compensate for the lack of displacement. Lift the hood on a 5.0 and you will see a clean V8 with aftermarket performance written all over it. Drive it and you will hear the sweet sound of 302 putting out a conservative 360 horses. Drive an Ecoboost and you may hear some turbo windup, but the growl of a healthy V8 is not there. Put 91 octane in the 5.0, add 3:73 gears and give it some wide open throttle, tach it to 6,000 and hold on. It is fun! About the 5.0 motor: it has 4 bolt cross bolted mains, a forged steel crank, windage tray, hi-tech block design and material and a 7.5 qt. oil pan. This motor can handle a supercharger with no problem. Read the review of the 5.0 at pickuptrucks.com. Ford is pushing the Ecoboost (cafe standards) but the sleeper is the 5.0L.
Here's the link to that review mentioned above: http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2011/02...liter-v-8.html

Last edited by Combat vet; 11-23-2012 at 10:26 PM. Reason: Add link
Combat vet is offline  
The following 5 users liked this post by Combat vet:
mikeyd1016 (11-25-2012), smurfs_of_war (11-23-2012), The Machinist (11-23-2012), Tussin_Wolf (11-23-2012), twotoilets (11-24-2012)
Old 11-23-2012, 09:23 PM
  #8  
Brianm825
 
Tussin_Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 583
Received 66 Likes on 35 Posts

Default

The Hemi hooked to their new 6 speed tranny is probably a little quicker; I've been "outrun" by one before, but I've also closed that gap on one once we got to the top end. Where the 5.0L shines is that fact that it gets better mileage than the Hemi and the Hemi can only come close to the Coyote's number when its using its MDS active displacement technology or whatever they're calling it now. Once you hook a load onto the Hemi and it has to use all 8 cylinders all the time, you might as well just start throwing dollar bills out the window; that thing is an absolute pig when it's towing.
Tussin_Wolf is offline  
Old 11-23-2012, 09:39 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Venuspie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 252
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sullyman
Having come from a hemi Durango, and test driven a hemi truck before buying my 5.0, the Ford is better in all categories.

I have also heard rumors that the coyote will "outrun" the hemi on the street.
I've heard those same rumors......
Venuspie is offline  
Old 11-23-2012, 09:39 PM
  #10  
lifted autobot driver
 
palmettotiger1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: texas
Posts: 507
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Combat vet

I did drive several Eco's with different rear end ratios. They are impressive in terms of low end torque and quick acceleration. Having had turbo cars and turbo diesel trucks in the past, I knew that when the turbo(s) spool up, the mileage drops. With 221 cubic inches, the Eco V6 would be spooling those turbos much of the time to compensate for the lack of displacement. Lift the hood on a 5.0 and you will see a clean V8 with aftermarket performance written all over it. Drive it and you will hear the sweet sound of 302 putting out a conservative 360 horses. Drive an Ecoboost and you may hear some turbo windup, but the growl of a healthy V8 is not there. Put 91 octane in the 5.0, add 3:73 gears and give it some wide open throttle, tach it to 6,000 and hold on. It is fun! About the 5.0 motor: it has 4 bolt cross bolted mains, a forged steel crank, windage tray, hi-tech block design and material and a 7.5 qt. oil pan. This motor can handle a supercharger with no problem. Read the review of the 5.0 at pickuptrucks.com. Ford is pushing the Ecoboost (cafe standards) but the sleeper is the 5.0L.
Where my like button good review of the coyot
palmettotiger1 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Combat vet (11-23-2012)


Quick Reply: 5.0 vs 5.7 hemi



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:41 AM.