Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

3.73 5.0 versus 3.31 Eco

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2017, 08:48 PM
  #11  
Senior Member

 
Spiky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 9,910
Received 2,102 Likes on 1,725 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by atwowheelguy
It would appear that Ford rates the towing capacity of the 5.0 w/3.73 axle as exactly the same as the 3.5TT w/3.31 axle. This is the chart for 2013.
Doesn't mean they feel the same. Still completely different power ranges and behavior.
Old 10-17-2017, 10:20 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
marshallr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,221
Likes: 0
Received 1,284 Likes on 902 Posts
Default

When I was shopping for used trucks 1.5 years ago all the 5.0's I found had 3.55's and all the 3.5 EB's I found had 3.31's in them. After driving several of each I felt the 5.0 had more power. At best it was a tie. I ended up buying a 14 Supercrew 4X4 with the 5.0 with 10K fewer miles for the same price as an identical 13 with the 3.5. For the same money I got a 1 year newer truck with 10,000 fewer miles and I don't feel I missed a thing by not having the EB.

If I had found a 5.0 with 3.73's I'd have bought it. But those are pretty rare.
Old 10-17-2017, 11:03 PM
  #13  
Member
 
rmdailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 51
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Missmy06
I currently have 3.31 gear equipped 2014 Ecoboost and I have been very unhappy with the lack of power/ inability to tow well and just the Eco engine in general. I am in a position now where I think I can offload this truck and pick up a 3.73 equipped 5.0. I have no experience with the 5.0, so my question is directed at those that have experience with a 3.73 equipped 5.0. Will I be happier with the towing ability of a 3.73 5.0 versus my 3.31 Eco.
What exactly are you pulling with your ecoboost? I have a 2013 EB with 3:31 and have been trilled with the towing when compared to the old 5.4. I typically pull a cargo trailer loaded to about 5000# several times a week.

My BIL has a 2011 5.0 with 3:73s. I'll take the low-end diesel-like grunt of the EB over the roar of the V8. His 5.0 pulls well, but my EB doesn't seem to work as hard.

I'd say if you're struggling with the 3:31 EB you're at a weight where you want a Max Tow or a F250.
Old 10-17-2017, 11:11 PM
  #14  
How's she goin' eh?
 
M0RRIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: South Detroit
Posts: 4,293
Received 588 Likes on 488 Posts
Default

I'm happy with mine. I don't have any experiences with the eco motors so I can't say what driving those are like. If you were close to me (where are you?) I'd throw you the keys for the afternoon and see how you liked it. I didn't have to re calibrate the tire change and it still gets up and goes.

I've also only towed a couple times and have hauled various materials (bricks, wood, other building materials) a bunch of times to the dump.
Here's a couple pics, I try to take snapshots when I use it as a truck.










That trailer weighs a ton. It's all wood and over built. That's hauling my newphew's playhouse. I'll look for more pics.

Part of a load of my fence I removed. It doesn't help you judge by that was full of 1x6's and 4x4's. I've looked at my weight when I leave the dump, and it's in the neighborhood of 6400lbs if that helps. I wish I could help you more with towing experience. I really went with 3.73's because I knew I was upgrading my tire size and didn't want to have to regear from 3.55 or 3.31. I got lucky when I bought, I googled the axle code on the lot and was happy with what I found. It wasn't the main reason why I bought my truck but it is a plus IMO.

My buddy who has a 05 with a 5.4L and 3.73's and 305's said he wanted to see how mine did driving and towing his offroad toy and trailer but he's in Detroit and our schedules don't always work out.

Last edited by M0RRIS; 10-17-2017 at 11:26 PM.
Old 10-18-2017, 12:03 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
JLTD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 667
Received 83 Likes on 74 Posts

Default

I've had the 5.0 with both the 3.73 and 3.55.

3.73, hands down. Cost about 1mpg - maybe - and so much more driveable with less downshifting, especially in the mountains.

And in 25mph areas, you could lock it in "M" and third gear and putt around town all day long.
Old 10-18-2017, 12:07 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Missmy06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 632
Received 214 Likes on 122 Posts
Default

Thank you very much for all the replies. I had previously convinced myself that I needed a 6.2 but finding one has proven hopeless unless in a Raptor that I cannot afford. It sounds to me based on the replies the 5.0 with 3.73s is a beast as long as your willing to rev it out which I'm okay with. My travel trailer weighs approx 5,000 pounds loaded and my little V6 spends most of its time in boost to keep rolling, I have it tuned by 5* which helped but I fear for this engines longevity, especially after reading countless blown eco engine threads, mostly with thrown rods. My truck spends alot of its life towing so the engine definitely works hard.
Old 10-18-2017, 12:10 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
jdunk54nl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,891
Received 1,527 Likes on 1,205 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Missmy06
Thank you very much for all the replies. I had previously convinced myself that I needed a 6.2 but finding one has proven hopeless unless in a Raptor that I cannot afford. It sounds to me based on the replies the 5.0 with 3.73s is a beast as long as your willing to rev it out which I'm okay with. My travel trailer weighs approx 5,000 pounds loaded and my little V6 spends most of its time in boost to keep rolling, I have it tuned by 5* which helped but I fear for this engines longevity, especially after reading countless blown eco engine threads, mostly with thrown rods. My truck spends alot of its life towing so the engine definitely works hard.
Why not go superduty 6.2l? You can probably find those for the same price as a f150 6.2l. Worth a look anyway! I know overkill for 5000 lbs but then you could upgrade your trailer too
Old 10-18-2017, 12:16 AM
  #18  
How's she goin' eh?
 
M0RRIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: South Detroit
Posts: 4,293
Received 588 Likes on 488 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jdunk54nl
Why not go superduty 6.2l? You can probably find those for the same price as a f150 6.2l. Worth a look anyway! I know overkill for 5000 lbs but then you could upgrade your trailer too
This. I've posted before about looking for f250's if I hadn't bought my f150. Prices were similar, years were a little off. I could find 250's that were around 5 years used with average mileage for less than the sticker of my f150. Factor in the trade in value of my ranger and the prices were similar.

150 was $35k, they gave me $8.5k for my ranger. 250's were $26-30k.
Old 10-18-2017, 06:41 PM
  #19  
FORD lifer
 
montanaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: The Quad Cities - relocated from Montana
Posts: 1,232
Received 246 Likes on 185 Posts

Default

You don't want an aluminum body? Why not? Have you ever heard about rust and corrosion? You won't see rusted out quarter panels on a new one.


I haven't seen it mentioned, but if you like your truck find a competent shop and have them put in lower gears.
Old 10-18-2017, 06:53 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Missmy06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 632
Received 214 Likes on 122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by montanaman
You don't want an aluminum body? Why not? Have you ever heard about rust and corrosion? You won't see rusted out quarter panels on a new one.
I have read many threads about towing instability in the aluminum trucks that I don't want to deal with. That is one area where my truck excels, it is very stable when towing. Also, I don't want to deal with the warped dashboards that seem to plague all '15 up XL and XLTs. Insurance rates are higher with the aluminum body and I am limited to what bodyshops will perform repairs on it. I test drove a 2016 XLT and felt they really cheapened the interior quality compared to my 2014 XLT. Plus, being in Southern California I am not really concerned with rust as it isn't an issue here.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:26 PM.