Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2013 3.31 vs 2014 3.73

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2014, 12:21 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Billy Mulek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 79
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default 2013 3.31 vs 2014 3.73

I had a 2013 SCAB EB with 3.31 gear ratio. I needed to get a Super Crew for the room and I picked up a 2014 Supercrew EB 6.5 MAX TOW with 3.73 gear ratio. I live in Northern Minnesota and we are setting record up here for consecutive days below zero. (main reason I believe i have poor MPG) Prior to the start of winter I changed the oil in the 2013 and that's when I generally reset my MPG. I was getting 13.5 when I traded the truck in two weeks ago. With the new truck and with only 700 miles on it I am 13.0 - 13.1. I excepted the MPG to suffer in the new truck as it is bigger but I excepted worse than that. I guess what I am asking for does anyone have idea of what I should see long term from going for a 3.31 scab to a 3.73 screw in regards to MPG.

I am not complaining about the MPG or trying to start a debate about it as there are many threads already. I just curious if anyone else out there has experience in the two different set ups.
Old 02-25-2014, 01:13 PM
  #2  
Zax
♫♪ I Hold On ♫♪
 
Zax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Alaska
Posts: 1,366
Received 77 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Mine probably doesn't apply but I do have 3.73 gears..just the 5.0 instead of the eco. We haven't been as cold as you at all, we are around 20-30* F. But I do have the same number of miles on my 5.0, i'm so far getting 15.6 mpg mixed driving. I don't know if this helps at all since it's not the same engine..but yeah..if it does good..if not..well shoot. lol
Old 02-25-2014, 01:30 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
Cypress's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I'm getting anywhere from 17-20 on the freeway on my '14 screw EB 4x2 w/ max tow package in socal. About 13-15 in the city, using cali 10% eth crap gas.
Old 02-25-2014, 01:32 PM
  #4  
Five-0 Ret.
 
Wanted33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Down South in Dixie
Posts: 5,726
Received 674 Likes on 578 Posts

Default

New engine, weather, more truck weight, and yes the 3.73's will use a little more gas because the rpm's are higher when your cruising. I wouldn't think the loss your seeing is out of the norm. Congrats on the new truck, it should be a monster pulling machine.


As an example I went from a 2wd 3.7L SCREW w/3.73 gears to a 2wd 5.0L SCREW w/3.31 gears and there isn't a thimble full of difference in the mpg's. I was surprised.

Last edited by Wanted33; 02-25-2014 at 01:34 PM.
Old 02-25-2014, 02:45 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
white08gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Collierville, Tn
Posts: 1,356
Received 165 Likes on 126 Posts

Default

in town driving you have a mechanical advantage to having 3.73s, will suffer a little bit more on the highway. lower gears makes it easier to take off.
Old 02-25-2014, 09:09 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
zx12-iowa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: midwest
Posts: 4,093
Received 646 Likes on 498 Posts

Default

Must be a lot of city driving. My Eco is at 17 mixed in minneapolis. Nearly as cold here.
Old 02-25-2014, 09:30 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
04black150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 253
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I just bought my new '13 eco screw last week and I live in eastern nebraska. I've noticed I'm avg. around 14.8 with highway driving and driving in town all with a light foot(i live in rural neb). Its been -10-40 since I bought it last week. I feel you on the bad gas mileage, especially where the cold weather doesn't help. I have 3.31's in mine, so id say the weather along with breaking the engines over the next few months we will soon see the mpg's go up a tad! But I'm no expert lol
Old 02-25-2014, 10:16 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
PawPaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lockport, Louisiana
Posts: 8,250
Received 749 Likes on 622 Posts

Default

I bought my '13 3 week's ago and have the 3.31's with the Ecoboost. My first choice would have been the 3.73 or 3.55's to get the heavy truck rolling but I've been surprised with the low end torque how easily this engine accelerates. First two tank's I've averaged around 17.5 in combination driving untill I pulled my utility trailer behind it and mileage dropped into the 13-14 mpg range. Only have 1,100 miles on it now so it's got a way to go to probably get it best mileage. My son in law has a '13 Lariat 4x4 Screw with the 3.55's and I can't tell the difference in accelerating.
Old 02-25-2014, 10:23 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
venatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: MO
Posts: 763
Received 106 Likes on 86 Posts

Default

My mileage really varies because I'm not always driving without something behind me it seems. But, it's usually running around 14-15 mpg.

During the summer when I go out on some long drives, I easily get 19 mpg doing 65 mph.
Old 02-25-2014, 10:30 PM
  #10  
wait. what?
 
DavidKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 2,691
Received 271 Likes on 217 Posts

Default

my boss has a 2013 FX4 EcoBoost 6.5 max tow 3.73. he was averaging 17+ mixed driving with premium fuel (all stock truck with a tune) in the fall, but it's dropped down to the 12's throughout winter. I'm in Wisconsin so our climate is pretty similar. between cold starts and poor fuel quality the MPGs really do suffer greatly in the midwest winter months. my work van has been averaging around 7 compared to 11-12 in the summer.


Quick Reply: 2013 3.31 vs 2014 3.73



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 AM.