Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Soon only the wealthy will afford trucks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2012, 01:55 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Jetta03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

CAFE is a good idea, only the execution if flawed. It clearly has been twisted to benefit the biggest sales segment for the big 3 american auto makers, light trucks. These vehicles have the least technology and the highest profit margins of any vehicles on the road. IMO the standards for trucks should be much more stringent than then are in CAFE as they are the biggest polluters. And the thought that this will cost the consumer more is bunk. How much did the new engine lineup add to the bottom line price of an F150 model for model? Not much.

Honestly the people against these regulations would be the first to complain when they can't breath the air, drink the water, or afford to fill their truck.

Give me a v6 40mpg uinbody truck that weighs 4000lb and can pull 10000. Who wouldn't want that? The big 3 that's who.

Last edited by Jetta03; 10-06-2012 at 01:57 PM.
Jetta03 is offline  
Old 10-06-2012, 02:30 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
Kytann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 694
Received 92 Likes on 73 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Fairlane64

There's no reason on earth that something like this shouldn't be available in the US: http://www.ford.com.au/commercial/ranger

I mean c'mon, people have no use for a 30+ mpg small hauler anymore? Hell even my old 91 Ford Ranger could get over 25 mpg if I didn't drive it like an idiot. I would think something that could haul, has choice of standard, extended, or 4 doors, and a 30+ mpg small turbodiesel would have a market here. Well, it WILL have a market when fuel jumps another $1 or more per gallon, and the only choice is a full sized truck that only burns gas.
Wow. Same wheelbase as my RCSB. 6' Bed with the Supercab, and a payload of 2606 lbs, with a towing capacity of 7400 lbs. Pretty stout.

Hell the Regular Cab has a Payload of 3097 lbs.

Those modern Rangers are pretty impressive. I'd buy one.



Originally Posted by Materk
I don't get why any one would want a reg cab other then for fleet or sport truck.I bought my supercrew ....
Not everyone wants to drive around a minivan all day. Whenever I see a supercrew all I think of is squirmy whiny little snot-nosed kids running around, just like a minivan.

Why else would you carry around all of that extra weight and dead space if you didn't need it for kids?

News flash for you: Not everyone is a breeder.
Kytann is offline  
Old 10-06-2012, 02:35 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
EricTheOracle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,773
Received 99 Likes on 73 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 95stepside
if this turns into some political BS, it will be closed
Why? Is it impossible to discuss politics in a lucid and informed way?
EricTheOracle is offline  
Old 10-06-2012, 02:46 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
GatorMedic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: FL
Posts: 2,494
Received 76 Likes on 51 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kytann
Not everyone wants to drive around a minivan all day. Whenever I see a supercrew all I think of is squirmy whiny little snot-nosed kids running around, just like a minivan.

Why else would you carry around all of that extra weight and dead space if you didn't need it for kids?

News flash for you: Not everyone is a breeder.
Some people have these things called friends. Every time you want to go on a fishing trip, hunting trip, camping, ballgame, etc with your friends, it would be seriously annoying to have to take 2-3 vehicles every time when one will do. All of my friends around my age (24) have either crew cabs or extended cabs. Most don't have kids, but they all have friends they like to do stuff with. Not to mention it's good to have dry, temp-control, lockable storage room in the cab.

Last edited by GatorMedic; 10-06-2012 at 02:52 PM.
GatorMedic is offline  
Old 10-06-2012, 02:48 PM
  #45  
Member
 
Fairlane64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 35
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jetta03
CAFE is a good idea, only the execution if flawed. It clearly has been twisted to benefit the biggest sales segment for the big 3 american auto makers, light trucks. These vehicles have the least technology and the highest profit margins of any vehicles on the road. IMO the standards for trucks should be much more stringent than then are in CAFE as they are the biggest polluters. And the thought that this will cost the consumer more is bunk. How much did the new engine lineup add to the bottom line price of an F150 model for model? Not much.

Honestly the people against these regulations would be the first to complain when they can't breath the air, drink the water, or afford to fill their truck.

Give me a v6 40mpg uinbody truck that weighs 4000lb and can pull 10000. Who wouldn't want that? The big 3 that's who.
Any regulation that is in volumes (not pages), and makes it so small turbodiesel vehicles aren't viable in the US, but are in almost every other country in the world is total BS in my opinion. I want regulations, I want clean air, that's just a given, but I also don't want government regulation full of loop holes and favoritism that shapes the American market into what we have today. CAFE isn't wrong in theory, it's just wrong in execution and needs to be fixed IMHO as soon as possible.

I want what you want, fair (should I say "sane") regulations, clean air, and smaller vehicles with greater economy available for purchase without legislation regulating them out of our domestic marketplace. I don't think that's too much to ask, or maybe it is... I dunno, that's why I'm not a politician.

Last edited by Fairlane64; 10-06-2012 at 02:52 PM.
Fairlane64 is offline  
Old 10-06-2012, 03:11 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
Kytann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 694
Received 92 Likes on 73 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cegan1825
Some people have these things called friends. Every time you want to go on a fishing trip, hunting trip, camping, ballgame, etc with your friends, it would be seriously annoying to have to take 2-3 vehicles every time when one will do. All of my friends around my age (24) have either crew cabs or extended cabs. Most don't have kids, but they all have friends they like to do stuff with. Not to mention it's good to have dry, temp-control, lockable storage room in the cab.
Most of my friends (37) have their own rides, and if they don't I'm not in the habit of driving them around. I respect and value self-sufficiency. The only one I want in the cab with me is the girlfriend.

Maybe I'm in the minority for that. But owning a vehicle that seats alot of people just so your 'friends' can come along seems a little desparate to me. I think most of the multi-seat trucks are used for kids, not friends.

I do think it's ridiculously annoying how the Supercabs get better rebates than the regular cabs so that they are almost the same real world price.
Kytann is offline  
Old 10-06-2012, 03:13 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
BobLobLaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 21,770
Received 242 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

When you compare our big F150's to compact diesels overseas, it's unbeleivable how incapable our trucks are. A VW Amorak is a tiny little truck that has a payload of 3000 lbs and can tow 10'000 lbs with 30+ mpg. A heavy duty F150 with an 8 ft box has a payload of around 2500 lbs. Why can't these trucks be available here? They would easily meet cafe requirements.
BobLobLaw is offline  
Old 10-06-2012, 03:33 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Especial86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,741
Received 532 Likes on 438 Posts

Default

"A mistake does not become a problem, until you refuse to correct it"..... JFK

Just Sayin....
Especial86 is offline  
Old 10-06-2012, 03:52 PM
  #49  
opinions are like *****...
 
MR.FX4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,839
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Seems everyone here has a problem with a free market supply and demand system. If Americans didnt overwhelmingly want crew cabs the would not be selling so many.

Like usual CAFE standards are a good idea screwed up by politicians. If you want to pull 10k with a 4k pound truck go ahead, i don't want to and like having a choice of a big heavy truck to do it. If the price of gas gets high enough (naturally) the market will dictate other standards

Driving friends or kids in a truck is desperate? I guess next time we go out for some fun we can have 3 designated drivers instead of 1. If you don't like them then you have other choices, if Ford doesn't cater to your wants buy another brand

Last edited by MR.FX4; 10-06-2012 at 03:56 PM.
MR.FX4 is offline  
Old 10-06-2012, 04:02 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
GatorMedic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: FL
Posts: 2,494
Received 76 Likes on 51 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kytann
Maybe I'm in the minority for that. But owning a vehicle that seats alot of people just so your 'friends' can come along seems a little desparate to me.
Taking roadtrips with friends is considered desperate to you... We have vastly different definitions of the word "desperate".
GatorMedic is offline  


Quick Reply: Soon only the wealthy will afford trucks



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:44 PM.