Smaller pickup
#11
Why not?
#12
#13
Better OUT then IN
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: South Florida (Ft. Lauderdale area)
Posts: 3,343
Received 253 Likes
on
206 Posts
Thanks for the insight.
My biggest shock from the comments is the mpgs. Who would have guessed that the mpgs are so close to same with the F150s.
Bass...Great detailed comments based on your experience. This is the information I was hoping to get.
I am still several years out and as others, I'm looking forward to seeing results on the upcoming Ranger... and possibly the Bronco. I do however, use the bed a lot so the Bronco may not be an option for me.
Thanks again guys...Good comments.
My biggest shock from the comments is the mpgs. Who would have guessed that the mpgs are so close to same with the F150s.
Bass...Great detailed comments based on your experience. This is the information I was hoping to get.
I am still several years out and as others, I'm looking forward to seeing results on the upcoming Ranger... and possibly the Bronco. I do however, use the bed a lot so the Bronco may not be an option for me.
Thanks again guys...Good comments.
Last edited by justjimmy; 02-02-2017 at 03:26 PM.
#14
2.7 Ecoboost Ranger
Still a year or two away though.
The new Wrangler Pickup (also a wait) might be an option too if hauling is truly minimal and off-road performance paramount.
Still a year or two away though.
The new Wrangler Pickup (also a wait) might be an option too if hauling is truly minimal and off-road performance paramount.
#17
I would say the Tacoma. My buddy just bought a 2015 and he likes it a lot how compact and much easier to drive it is. Although off-roading stock is medium because he bottomed out a lot in mud because of the height
#20
Member
To the OP You will regret going to a smaller truck.
.