Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Reprogramming Wheel Circumference (FORScan)

Old 02-25-2019, 04:59 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
baddceo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 213
Received 28 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by whoopidoo
I overlooked this at one point, and I'm not clear from the thread if you used this specifically, but this link below I found in the forscan spreadsheet. Note the fine tuning options (in tenths of a MPH) halfway down this page:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...EqU/edit#gid=0
That is exactly where I educated myself in this process. I am trying to figure out if it's worth the effort to gain the .5mph. If the tire is truly 32.5 tall as mentioned then I've simply used the wrong input so I am going to take an actual measure inflated on the truck and see where I land. From there I will take another stab and see what happens. Worst outcome is I go back to what I have now which I can live with.
Old 02-25-2019, 11:56 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
baddceo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 213
Received 28 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Well my 33x12.5x20 setup is actually only 31.5 tall. How does that make any sense. I guess I'll plug in that conversion which would be 318 x 46 x 20 and see what happens. On the fence as what I am working with now seems pretty good. I have yet to get on highway and check things at 70.

what's confusing is that the current hexadecimal code loaded would appear to have my setup smaller than my OEM code as gps says 49 while speedo says 50. If I load the code associated with a 32.5 inch tire its gonna be worse as that would tell the ECU the opposite of what is needed. I think it's not worth any more effort1

Last edited by baddceo; 02-26-2019 at 12:31 AM.
Old 02-26-2019, 08:56 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
jp360cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: NC
Posts: 1,262
Received 172 Likes on 148 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by baddceo
That is exactly where I educated myself in this process. I am trying to figure out if it's worth the effort to gain the .5mph. If the tire is truly 32.5 tall as mentioned then I've simply used the wrong input so I am going to take an actual measure inflated on the truck and see where I land. From there I will take another stab and see what happens. Worst outcome is I go back to what I have now which I can live with.
I'm not surprised, especially if that's with the truck sitting on the ground. The weigh of the truck will compress the tire.

Originally Posted by baddceo
Well my 33x12.5x20 setup is actually only 31.5 tall. How does that make any sense. I guess I'll plug in that conversion which would be 318 x 46 x 20 and see what happens. On the fence as what I am working with now seems pretty good. I have yet to get on highway and check things at 70.

what's confusing is that the current hexadecimal code loaded would appear to have my setup smaller than my OEM code as gps says 49 while speedo says 50. If I load the code associated with a 32.5 inch tire its gonna be worse as that would tell the ECU the opposite of what is needed. I think it's not worth any more effort1
Sounds like you are thinking about it backwards. If your speedometer is reading slower than gps, then you need at input a bigger tire. If your speedometer is reading faster than gps, you need to input a smaller tire.

Think about it like this... All the speedometer knows is how fast the tire turning. A bigger tire is going more distance for each rotation, so the truck is actually going faster than the speedometer is reading. GPS speed will be greater than speedometer speed. Enter a larger tire size to slow down the speedometer.

The following users liked this post:
baddceo (02-26-2019)
Old 02-28-2019, 03:28 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
baddceo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 213
Received 28 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jp360cj
Is your speedometer reading too fast or too slow? Too fast indicates you need a value for a shorter tire. Too slow indicates you need a value for taller tire. Toyo specs that tire at 32.5" tall.
So i upped the Hexicdecimal to match that for a 318x53x20 which is just slightly taller than what I had before at 318x52x20. Now when my speedo says 50 my GPS say 48-49 as does Wayz and another GPS unit I checked. This would tell me that the programmed tire size is now too tall, correct? It wasn't even a full mph off on the 52, but as the truck gets faster going the more it doesn't match the speedo again this case Speedo says faster than GPS.
Old 02-28-2019, 04:33 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
jp360cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: NC
Posts: 1,262
Received 172 Likes on 148 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by baddceo
So i upped the Hexicdecimal to match that for a 318x53x20 which is just slightly taller than what I had before at 318x52x20. Now when my speedo says 50 my GPS say 48-49 as does Wayz and another GPS unit I checked. This would tell me that the programmed tire size is now too tall, correct? It wasn't even a full mph off on the 52, but as the truck gets faster going the more it doesn't match the speedo again this case Speedo says faster than GPS.
To recap (just to make sure I'm following correctly...

You had values for a 318/52/20 tire. Speedometer read 50, GPS read 49. Speedometer too fast.
Changed to 318/53/20 (1/4 inch taller). Now Speedomter 50, GPS reads 48-49. Speedometer too fast, but by more than before.

Sounds to me like when you got bigger, the speedometer got farther ahead of the GPS reading, so you need to go smaller. This would confirm what I was saying in my last post.

If there is an error in the speedometer, I would expect for it to be larger at higher speeds. The % error should remain fairly constant, so the higher the speed, the more MPH the error will be. Just out of curiosity, what do the hexadecimal values you enter correlate to? You keep mentioning metric tire sizes (i.e. 318/53/20)..is that what the hexadecimal actually represents, or are you converting that to diameter, circumference, or rotations/mile, or something else?
Old 02-28-2019, 05:10 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
baddceo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 213
Received 28 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jp360cj
To recap (just to make sure I'm following correctly...

You had values for a 318/52/20 tire. Speedometer read 50, GPS read 49. Speedometer too fast.
Changed to 318/53/20 (1/4 inch taller). Now Speedomter 50, GPS reads 48-49. Speedometer too fast, but by more than before.

Sounds to me like when you got bigger, the speedometer got farther ahead of the GPS reading, so you need to go smaller. This would confirm what I was saying in my last post.

If there is an error in the speedometer, I would expect for it to be larger at higher speeds. The % error should remain fairly constant, so the higher the speed, the more MPH the error will be. Just out of curiosity, what do the hexadecimal values you enter correlate to? You keep mentioning metric tire sizes (i.e. 318/53/20)..is that what the hexadecimal actually represents, or are you converting that to diameter, circumference, or rotations/mile, or something else?
that is a metric conversion from 33x12.5x20 which what is needed to convert to the 4 digit hexidecimal for forscan. The speedo and gps match until 25 mph and then its gets progressively worse the faster you go. So maybe I'll drop to a 51 and see what happens since 53 to tall, and 52 almost right
Old 03-01-2019, 08:51 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
jp360cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: NC
Posts: 1,262
Received 172 Likes on 148 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by baddceo
that is a metric conversion from 33x12.5x20 which what is needed to convert to the 4 digit hexidecimal for forscan.
So you have to convert the metric size to hexadecimal? That really doesn't make any sense. I would expect the value entered to be based solely on the diameter/circumference/revs per mile. Circumference would be most logical as it would give the most exact figure without decimals. Anyway, if you can't get it close enough using the 12.5" tire and 20" wheel, you can change either the section width or wheel diameter in your calculation. A narrower tire would give smaller step changes for the same change in aspect ratio.
Old 03-01-2019, 09:16 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
baddceo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 213
Received 28 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jp360cj
So you have to convert the metric size to hexadecimal? That really doesn't make any sense. I would expect the value entered to be based solely on the diameter/circumference/revs per mile. Circumference would be most logical as it would give the most exact figure without decimals. Anyway, if you can't get it close enough using the 12.5" tire and 20" wheel, you can change either the section width or wheel diameter in your calculation. A narrower tire would give smaller step changes for the same change in aspect ratio.
This is the link from this website that allows you to load the tire size in metric measurements. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mWnuQZlDTUGjKjmJje1QJIR8Z2c7Kf8KBZxKnw_8EqU/edit#gid=0

If
318/52/20 was the closest but still showing too tall and 318/53/20 which is what I have now is even taller then you are right what I need to do is go in and try 317/52/20 or 316/52/20. Didn't even think about changing the profile size. Thank you for that tip.
The following users liked this post:
jp360cj (03-01-2019)
Old 03-01-2019, 09:37 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Kingofwylietx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,159
Received 716 Likes on 425 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by baddceo
.............Over the weekend I ordered my dongle from Amazon and got my FORScan software setup. I am an experienced software person but doing things like this to the ECU on a truck still made me nervous. I followed @Livnitup's directions and everything worked exactly as it should. .....
Which Dongle did you get? I'm still on the fence about doing this exact thing (tire size change)...but using FORScan is a bit intimidating. I'm usually pretty good at figuring things. The sheer size of that FORScan thread gives me a pause. Add that to having never done it and then throw in a little fear of melting the truck with a typo.
Old 03-01-2019, 09:50 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
baddceo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 213
Received 28 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kingofwylietx
Which Dongle did you get? I'm still on the fence about doing this exact thing (tire size change)...but using FORScan is a bit intimidating. I'm usually pretty good at figuring things. The sheer size of that FORScan thread gives me a pause. Add that to having never done it and then throw in a little fear of melting the truck with a typo.
Here is the one I ordered.
ELMConfig Item B01F0GVBWY ELMConfig Item B01F0GVBWY
- I can get the link to work. Just search on that number

I was on the fence about BT and decided I would rather have a hard wired connection just in case BT dropped or something in between. Just taking another variable out of the equation was good enough for me, plus it's only $29.

I had the same reservations you did but after watching the videos and doing exactly what you see it turned out to be much less intimidating once I got under way. The heated seat and steering wheel options on the home screen is a nice little touch and having auto window up and do from my key fob will come in hand in the warmer months.

Anyway the tire size change is painless, just save each module as original before changing them. I also took a screen shot snippet of each forscan change I made before I made it.

Last edited by baddceo; 03-01-2019 at 09:55 AM.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Reprogramming Wheel Circumference (FORScan)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:35 PM.