Which one of these 2012's would you pick??
#12
The FX and its mainly because of that Dark Blue on the XLT. I have owned a 97 ranger that was that color and I almost always thought the lighter blue looks better. That dark blue is just meh, it doesn't stand out or have the look that comes with black. It does not weather well with age either.
The FX comes with better wheels and a nicer interior as well (with the exception of the road head blocking center console).
The FX comes with better wheels and a nicer interior as well (with the exception of the road head blocking center console).
#14
Senior Member
3.5?? if it's the ecoboost it's 3.2l V8.... it doesn't have the manly rumble of the 5.0 but as soon as the turbos spool up it's a beast.. Like #1 if it's the ecoboost for the motor .. and number two just for looks... but I'd rather see the step bars instead of the ugly running boards
#15
Senior Member
#1. Love the chrome and the paint.
#18
Senior Member
Lariat all the way!
#19
The FX4 by a slight margin simply because I don't like the Lariat chrome package. If it was a Dark Blue Pearl Lariat with two-tone and no chrome package then I'd go with that.
#20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Batesville, AR
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would say FX4.... But I am a little biased....
Attachment 113352
That Lariat does look nice though. I love those chrome 20"s.-
Attachment 113352
That Lariat does look nice though. I love those chrome 20"s.-