Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2.7eb vs 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-2016, 12:13 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Chris0418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default 2.7eb vs 5.0

My first time posting to the forum.
The main reason I joined was a) I am a truck junkie although I haven't owned one since a 3/4 ton Silverado which I am still trying to forget and b) I will be purchasing one in the next 6 months and found this website perfect to research well before hand.
I have narrowed my search to a toss up between the newer smaller EB and the 5.0.
Alot of the reading i have done on the EB had stated there isn't a great difference in fuel economy between them and would appreciate any feedback at all.
Currently not the handiest with a wrench but looking to turn that around and do most of the regular maintenance myself.

Chris
Old 07-28-2016, 07:04 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
JCR 56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: KY.
Posts: 3,259
Received 770 Likes on 608 Posts

Default

My only problem with the 2.7 is it's size, only 165 cu. in., and that seems kind of small to push these large trucks around, in my opinion any way, so I would worry about reliability down the road.
Old 07-28-2016, 07:09 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
StangMan04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Richmond,Va
Posts: 893
Received 125 Likes on 95 Posts

Default

This has been asked many times on this forum. A search especially in the 2015+ section should turn up many threads to help you with your decision.
Old 07-28-2016, 09:43 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
TLM FX4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 103
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Why the 2.7 instead of the 3.5 vs the 5.0? It should come down to what you really want the truck for. Good gas mileage and trucks generally don't exist.
Old 07-28-2016, 09:50 AM
  #5  
Beer, Boats, and Trucks.
 
berty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 3,256
Received 603 Likes on 457 Posts

Default

The 2.7 will get you better gas mileage except for when towing (although it will likely feel better towing due to where the power sits). The 2.7 is also the quicker of the two. 5.0 sounds badass though lol


All in all, they aren't all that different performance wise, so where the 2.7 might take the edge on certain things I don't think you will be upset either way.
Old 07-28-2016, 10:25 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Chris0418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Agreed.
Looking for the best combination of fuel economy and reliability.
The 2.7 worries me in terms of the turbos giving out over time and the size of the truck stressing the engine out.
I take good care of my vehicles, I currently am driving a Mazda6 with 340k on it.
Just not sure if the extra 200k to a tank is worth the risk.

Originally Posted by TLM FX4
Why the 2.7 instead of the 3.5 vs the 5.0? It should come down to what you really want the truck for. Good gas mileage and trucks generally don't exist.
Old 07-28-2016, 10:35 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
tsigwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Garland, Tx
Posts: 1,484
Received 264 Likes on 186 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Chris0418
Agreed.
Looking for the best combination of fuel economy and reliability.
The 2.7 worries me in terms of the turbos giving out over time and the size of the truck stressing the engine out.
I take good care of my vehicles, I currently am driving a Mazda6 with 340k on it.
Just not sure if the extra 200k to a tank is worth the risk.
The 2.7 was designed for the truck with the usage of a truck in mind. Nothing to worry about. In fact, I bet that since this is the first gen of the engine, they OVER engineered it. This engine has a ton of power when needed and will get you very good MPG's if you allow it to.
Old 07-28-2016, 10:35 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
tsigwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Garland, Tx
Posts: 1,484
Received 264 Likes on 186 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JCR 56
My only problem with the 2.7 is it's size, only 165 cu. in., and that seems kind of small to push these large trucks around, in my opinion any way, so I would worry about reliability down the road.
So no problem with the 3.5L?
Old 07-28-2016, 06:57 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
7thSeal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 197
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris0418
I have narrowed my search to a toss up between the newer smaller EB and the 5.0.

Chris
What exactly do you need the engine to do? Either one considered.
Old 07-28-2016, 11:51 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Wannafbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pittsburgh Pa
Posts: 2,121
Received 172 Likes on 145 Posts

Default

If you plan to tow the EB's are the better choice. The 5.0 will have more top end HP than the 2.7. The 2.7 will have more low end torque.


Quick Reply: 2.7eb vs 5.0



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 AM.