Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lack of mods for 3.3L V6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-2019, 10:21 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Timboslice87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Lack of mods for 3.3L V6

Recently purchased a 2018 Ford F-150 XLT 3.3L V6. This particular engine choice has very few options mod wise, which is a shame because it is the one that most needs something. The only cold air intake I can find is “AFE: Magnum force”. Other brands that I’ve actually heard of don’t make one. Air Raid, Roush, K&N pretty much only cater to the V8 and EcoBoost. K&N does make a drop in Oil Filter. So that would probably be the way to go. Anyone else bummed out about the lack of choices here?
The following users liked this post:
The3.3 (03-23-2023)
Old 03-22-2019, 10:38 PM
  #2  
Member

 
RLXXI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Big Easy
Posts: 26,680
Received 6,199 Likes on 4,672 Posts

Default

Don't waste coin on a CAI, your truck came with one from the factory. Good luck on the rest.
.
Old 03-22-2019, 11:12 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
SteveLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Iowa
Posts: 5,193
Received 884 Likes on 672 Posts

Default

Least popular engine. Less likely to be on a consumer vehicle, most in fleet. Not likely to be owned by buyers who are willing to drop lots of money on mods.

Makes sense.

Also NA vehicles require a lot of time and money to get a lot of performance. Whereas the Ecoboost requires $450 and 10 minutes.
Old 03-23-2019, 08:59 AM
  #4  
Senile member
 
chimmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Sarasota, FL area
Posts: 3,633
Received 1,048 Likes on 732 Posts
Default

For the money you'd spend and the gains you'd get, you'd have been better off getting a better motor from the outset. Especially with XLT trim.

Anyway, it's not a bad engine. The transmission is really holding it back. Maybe get a tune to reprogram the transmission logic better? It could definitely, definitely use that.
Old 03-23-2019, 10:46 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Timboslice87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Funny you mention the 3.3L V6 is usually a fleet vehicle, as mine was before I purchased. That’s one reason why I got a great deal on the truck with low miles. Probably the only way to get a crew cab XLT almost-new for that price. EcoBoost or V8 would’ve put me over the $30,000 mark.

I guess i bring bring up the mods because it is a bit sluggish and I’m at about 18.5 MPG. I was hoping a CAI and tonneau cover combination might put a little pep in the step while getting me closer to the 20 MPG mark. I would’ve loved the EcoBoost or V8 with 10 speed, but unfortunately was outside of my budget.
Old 03-23-2019, 10:54 AM
  #6  
Super Moderator

iTrader: (1)
 
djfllmn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 21,318
Received 4,142 Likes on 2,841 Posts

Default

that sounds right about where you should be. It is a naturally aspirated V6 moving a crew cab full size truck
The following 2 users liked this post by djfllmn:
chimmike (03-23-2019), gregsf150stx (03-24-2019)
Old 03-23-2019, 11:34 AM
  #7  
Senior Member

 
SteveLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Iowa
Posts: 5,193
Received 884 Likes on 672 Posts

Default

Don't expect any MPG changes from either. Your best bet for performance per dollar is a custom tune.
Old 03-24-2019, 10:42 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
bradtx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 286
Received 28 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Timboslice87
Funny you mention the 3.3L V6 is usually a fleet vehicle, as mine was before I purchased. That’s one reason why I got a great deal on the truck with low miles. Probably the only way to get a crew cab XLT almost-new for that price. EcoBoost or V8 would’ve put me over the $30,000 mark.

I guess i bring bring up the mods because it is a bit sluggish and I’m at about 18.5 MPG. I was hoping a CAI and tonneau cover combination might put a little pep in the step while getting me closer to the 20 MPG mark. I would’ve loved the EcoBoost or V8 with 10 speed, but unfortunately was outside of my budget.
One thing I learned with my 3.7L is that MPG is better by ~1 MPG with 89 octane gas than with 87. 93 octane only slightly improved, not enough to spend the money for. If towing or in hilly terrain the 93 octane may've done better. Any driveability differences can easily be listed under a placebo effect so no claims on that.

An engine tune using a global ignition advance can help, but you'll be confined to using 91/93 octane gas. Since the PCM/engine "determines" octane via the knock sensor the best performance will come when the knock sensor retards ignition timing the least and allows for the best ignition timing advance for the engine's load.

Regearing is the best bang for the buck performance mod. 3.73 and 4.10 ratios suit the high revving NA Cyclones well

Brad
Old 03-24-2019, 11:40 AM
  #9  
Gone Golfin
iTrader: (3)
 
idrive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: St George Utah
Posts: 5,675
Received 2,271 Likes on 1,391 Posts

Default

Also need to remember is the 3.3L is a relatively new engine.

If you're thinking a different CAI is going to help with power or gas mileage, prepare to be disappointed.
Old 03-26-2019, 05:52 AM
  #10  
Member
 
13XLTEco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Southside, Arkansas
Posts: 657
Received 153 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

Hopefully it has 3.73 rear.



Quick Reply: Lack of mods for 3.3L V6



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:55 PM.