Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How about 37 mpg? The Achates engine at the Detroit Auto Show

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2018, 08:37 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Tom_with_a_Truck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 403
Received 58 Likes on 51 Posts
Default How about 37 mpg? The Achates engine at the Detroit Auto Show

Since it's in an F-150, I thought it might be of interest here...

https://www.trucks.com/2018/01/15/de...pickup-engine/
Old 01-15-2018, 08:45 AM
  #2  
Senile member
 
chimmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Sarasota, FL area
Posts: 3,633
Received 1,048 Likes on 732 Posts
Default

A lot of claims without any videos showing it running and getting 30+mpg as proof
Old 01-15-2018, 08:49 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Eduskator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,305
Received 216 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

37MPG? Good luck getting that, even with a car... I am sceptic.

The Ram Ecodiesel engine is pretty close to the EPA numbers however. Perhaps this one will be as well! Looking forward to see/hear the real numbers!
Old 01-15-2018, 08:57 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Tom_with_a_Truck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 403
Received 58 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

I wonder if the coming CAFE standards are the reason that everybody is coming out with a 7/8 size pickup truck. The new Ranger, for example, is likely to squeeze a couple more MPG out compared to the F-150.

I'm skeptical on the new design too, but I came across the article and thought it interesting if nothing else.
Old 01-15-2018, 08:59 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Tom_with_a_Truck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 403
Received 58 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Eduskator
37MPG? Good luck getting that, even with a car... I am sceptic.
People with the VW TDI were getting 50 on the highway, until dot-gov decided that VW was cheating on the emissions test. Too bad too, because I like the idea of 50 mpg in a reasonably-sized smallish car with at least a little refinement.
Old 01-15-2018, 09:10 AM
  #6  
Senior Member

 
gone postal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central NY
Posts: 25,669
Received 434 Likes on 289 Posts

Default

37 MPG with a car is nothing new, my 1986 escort got better than that.

THe engine is technically very interesting, compression ignition gasoline engines aren't new, reliability out of one would be. I'd like to see an article actually explaining the engine, as some of the claims are rather dubious....no heads or valves remind me of an old sliding sleeve engine, which while simple, was almost as efficient as burning dollar bills.
The following users liked this post:
SCrewYou (01-15-2018)
Old 01-15-2018, 09:28 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Eduskator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,305
Received 216 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom_with_a_Truck
People with the VW TDI were getting 50 on the highway, until dot-gov decided that VW was cheating on the emissions test. Too bad too, because I like the idea of 50 mpg in a reasonably-sized smallish car with at least a little refinement.
Yep, they were getting 50+ MPG because their engines were polluting as hell (more MPG = more NOx in the air), which is an environment disaster itself. This company should have paid a lot more for what they've done. Was good for your wallet, but awful for the rest of the world.

Diesel is not the future at all, and I doubt Ford wants to invest a lot of $ in that, but I would be glad to see a ''real'' 37MPG diesel engine on a full-size truck.
Old 01-15-2018, 09:52 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Tom_with_a_Truck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 403
Received 58 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

I would probably disagree with the "polluting like hell" assessment. What really happened was that despite the government's and VW's best efforts, the UAW was not given carte blanc control over the new VW plant here in Chattanooga. As a result, the DC thugs clamped down on VW.

The restrictions placed on the Diesel engine in the US are more political in nature than scientific.
Old 01-15-2018, 10:04 AM
  #9  
Senior Member

 
gone postal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central NY
Posts: 25,669
Received 434 Likes on 289 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tom_with_a_Truck
I would probably disagree with the "polluting like hell" assessment. What really happened was that despite the government's and VW's best efforts, the UAW was not given carte blanc control over the new VW plant here in Chattanooga. As a result, the DC thugs clamped down on VW.

The restrictions placed on the Diesel engine in the US are more political in nature than scientific.

Sorry, the V-dub scandal was tipped off to the EPA by researchers in WV, not the UAW and D.C.

https://blog.caranddriver.com/how-vo...ons-standards/

The investigation started before the vote in chattanooga was even scheduled.

Last edited by gone postal; 01-15-2018 at 10:13 AM.
The following users liked this post:
elfiero (01-16-2018)
Old 01-15-2018, 10:08 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Eduskator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,305
Received 216 Likes on 183 Posts
Default

They clamped down VW?

VW are the ones who put devices in their diesel vehicles, a decade ado, that could detect when they were being tested, changing the performance/results. Conclusion are that these engines polluted 40x to 50x times more than the maximum allowed by the regulations. You don't call this an environmental disaster?

Anyways, let's not start that discussion again. Screw VW, I will never buy a vehicle from them in my life.

Last edited by Eduskator; 01-15-2018 at 10:10 AM.
The following users liked this post:
chimmike (01-15-2018)


Quick Reply: How about 37 mpg? The Achates engine at the Detroit Auto Show



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:11 PM.