Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Ford's Strong Answer to Sceptics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 15, 2014 | 09:53 PM
  #11  
KILOFINAL's Avatar
LONE STAR
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,005
Likes: 630
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by HardcoreFXFour
Sure, but one less repeat Ecoboost customer! Every customer matters, right?
Yup, and now two less repeat customers. I will never buy another Ecoboost as long as there is a normally aspirated engine choice.
Reply
Old May 15, 2014 | 10:00 PM
  #12  
LastResort's Avatar
International man of Myst
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 667
Likes: 166
From: PNW
Default

I've got 126k on my WRX with no more that scheduled maintenance, and anticipate at least another 50k. I see no reason to expect any less from the EcoBoost.
Reply
Old May 15, 2014 | 10:14 PM
  #13  
depami's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 168
From: Cleveland, MN
Default

Originally Posted by LastResort
I've got 126k on my WRX with no more that scheduled maintenance, and anticipate at least another 50k. I see no reason to expect any less from the EcoBoost.
Not sure you can really even compare the two.

I know many who are happy with their EgoBoost and a couple who aren't.
Reply
Old May 15, 2014 | 10:28 PM
  #14  
LastResort's Avatar
International man of Myst
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 667
Likes: 166
From: PNW
Default

Originally Posted by depami

Not sure you can really even compare the two.

I know many who are happy with their EgoBoost and a couple who aren't.
Why not, if we're talking reliability of turbos attached to gas engines? If you're talking about broader issues: I'm pretty confident that if i get shudder i can address it with gapped plugs and/or a hole. I'm not concerned about the fuel dilution as few people have actually shown longterm issues with the numbers most EcoBoosts operate at. Though there are a few short cyclers or people with leaking HPFPs that have gotten crazy numbers, so I'll keep an eye out.

Honestly I think my biggest concern is the sooting caused by the DI causing premature timing chain wear...but even that hasn't been really well documented.

That's not to say that others haven't had problems, but I just think a vocal minority on a message board does not make a good cross section of the population.
Reply
Old May 15, 2014 | 10:56 PM
  #15  
depami's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 168
From: Cleveland, MN
Default

Originally Posted by LastResort
Why not, if we're talking reliability of turbos attached to gas engines? ......
Yes, I guess you're right. Other than one being American and one being Japanese, they're pretty much identical.

Name:  EGO1.jpg
Views: 313
Size:  20.0 KB

Ford's Strong Answer to Sceptics-wrx-engine.jpg
Reply
Old May 16, 2014 | 01:01 AM
  #16  
LastResort's Avatar
International man of Myst
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 667
Likes: 166
From: PNW
Default

Originally Posted by depami
Yes, I guess you're right. Other than one being American and one being Japanese, they're pretty much identical.

Attachment 317661

Attachment 317662
I'm talking about the turbo. One is a mitsubishi which has produced a great number of reliable turbos for OEM applications. The other is BorgWarner which has produced a great number of reliable turbos for OEM applications. And yes, they are quite similar. Hot exhaust gases spin a turbine wheel that compresses intake air with a compressor wheel, regulated by a waste gate and boost solenoid. I really give a **** what country some thing has been designed or manufactured in, if it the process is proven. Both have shown to be quite reliable.
Reply
Old May 16, 2014 | 09:30 AM
  #17  
luvnc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 35
Likes: 2
Default

Guys what was wrong with your ecoboost? Didn't justify your hopes?
Reply
Old May 16, 2014 | 10:28 AM
  #18  
HCFX2013's Avatar
Beer Gut Extraordinaire
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 17,371
Likes: 2,111
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by luvnc
Guys what was wrong with your ecoboost? Didn't justify your hopes?
Broken timing chain tensioner, low end misfire, intercooler stumble (and lost 20% of my power when the dealer reflashed it to newer software), exhaust manifold leak and BOV malfunction all within 35,000 miles.
Reply
Old May 16, 2014 | 12:00 PM
  #19  
Tystevens's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 313
Likes: 41
From: SLC, Utah
Default

I've had 3 turbo'd vehicles that have all gone well over 100k miles w/o an issue. I don't have any turbo related concerns for my Ecoboost.

I guess I'm on the other side -- if there are good turbo options available, I don't know if I'll buy another na vehicle again! Of course, a bad experience w/ my EB could change my tune quickly, but so far, so good.
Reply
Old May 16, 2014 | 12:34 PM
  #20  
packplantpath's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,964
Likes: 584
Default

Originally Posted by Tystevens
Well, I'm not a Ford fan nor a hater ... I don't really have any brand preferences, to tell you the truth, but my GMs have always treated me well, and I probably would have just continued on that course.

So, I would not have a Ford in my driveway if not for the Ecoboost, I can tell you that right now! One drive and all of the other 1/2 tons on the market seemed to lose their appeal to me. And if my F150 EB works well, we'll likely buy an Ecoboost Expedition to replace our Suburban. So in my particular case, the EB has worked for Ford.
That was me as well. If mine ends up a bust I'll go to another brand. Still too early to tell since I have less than 12000 miles. There is no reason it won't last, but you never know given fords track record with the 5.4 cam phasers
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:54 AM.