Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

F150 vs Ranger opportunity

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-2011, 09:16 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
poccnr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ontario
Posts: 232
Received 14 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I wouldn't trade. I just had a 3.0 yes, it's a solid motor but the ***** were missing. I also hated the weak c-channel frame. I put it on the hoist and the doors won't even open from the flex... The fact that he wants money too is over the top.
Old 10-12-2011, 09:30 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
rbrais's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CT
Posts: 2,751
Received 100 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

I just sold my '01 Ranger Supercab 4.0 5 speed. I really liked that truck and it lasted me 10 years and 160k miles with no engine problems and never burned a drop of oil. But, my '02 F-150 has much more room and the interior is better. The seats make all the difference. Nice and sturdy compared to the Ranger's soft mushy buckets.

My friend had the same truck as me, a 2000 with the 3.0. I did not like that motor at all. No power and geared very low. You were constantly shifting because you would run out of RPM's and for some reason the gas pedal would pulse under acceleration.

If it was a 4.0 and an even trade, it might be worth it for the mileage, but not a 3.0 and wanting money.
Old 10-12-2011, 11:07 AM
  #13  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
firefoxmoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Alright guys, thanks for all the replies. You guys have confirmed my suspicions that the trade would not be worth it and I would regret trading down to the smaller truck. Now I will be looking into some simple upgrades for my F150 to squeeze as much as mpg out of it as I can. One of my biggest gripes about it right now is there is no cruise control. Which was not a big deal when I first got it, but now I am driving 100 mile trips about 3 times a week and cruise control would probably help my foot out as well as my fuel mileage. I will be calling some dealerships to see what they charge to install the whole thing. I have checked around the forums and apparently it's not too hard to install yourself and the cruise control switches are all you need since acceleration is electronically controlled. However even when you do it yourself you will need the dealership to program the switches which the average price seems to be $100-150. So if it's not that expensive ($300-400) I will probably just have them deal with it all. Thanks again guys for your input.
Old 10-12-2011, 04:29 PM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
dryin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: st cloud
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hey bud i got a 95 ranger with the 4.0 in it i hated that truck once i got my 07 f150 i would never go back to a ranger
Old 10-12-2011, 04:37 PM
  #15  
Registered User


iTrader: (2)
 
kozal01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 9,107
Received 1,388 Likes on 664 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dryin
hey bud i got a 95 ranger with the 4.0 in it i hated that truck once i got my 07 f150 i would never go back to a ranger
Off topic: Are you a member on FRF (www.fordrangerforum.com) by chance?

/ thread jack
Old 10-12-2011, 05:07 PM
  #16  
Member
 
ericzfx4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I had Rangers with both the 3.0 and the 4.0. The 3.0 is so slow and sluggish. Sold that truck after a week. The 4.0 was decent. But now that I have the F150 I would never downsize to a smaller truck. Just my opinion. Hope it helps you.



Quick Reply: F150 vs Ranger opportunity



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:43 AM.