Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ecoboost vs. 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-2014, 09:50 PM
  #111  
Senior Member
 
Cdn Paratrooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

One of the guys here has had a few things replaced on his EB through warranty-starter, one turbo, and the ecm module. His truck still has an odd tick and gets not real great gas mileage. He isn't real happy with it right now. Another guy has an odd whirring sound when his is idling-it has had it for a while and now that his warranty is gone..it is there to stay he figures.

They replaced the ecm thinking it would get rid of the hesitation but it didn't. I find the drive by wire system to suck even in my wife's Focus..there are times when it hesitates in the weirdest times...like turning left in an intersection...
Old 02-27-2014, 10:26 PM
  #112  
Senior Member
 
balreadysaid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 102
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I went and bought a eco scab today. 3.31 work nice seems to keep rpm at 1200 while im easy on it. I put 40 city miles on and was at 15 mpg avg. I hit the 65 mph for a few and 18.5 was fine by me. the 5.0 might be better on fuel and more reliable but only red xlt scab around me was a eco, so be it!
Old 02-27-2014, 10:32 PM
  #113  
Senior Member
 
jeffinthebag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,778
Received 336 Likes on 261 Posts

Default

I have the XLT 5.0 crew cab with the heavy duty payload package with the 3.73. Average around 14.5 everyday and a max of 18 mpg highway with the winter gas.
Old 03-09-2014, 11:38 AM
  #114  
Senior Member
 
LarryXLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 240
Received 76 Likes on 39 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by balreadysaid
great thread!
I agree.

I've been lurking here as I anticipate my next new truck.

Thanks all.
Old 03-13-2014, 02:25 PM
  #115  
Senior Member
 
Gravelley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: St. John's NL
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

so thought i would throw this little story up. So to start I have a 2012 F150 4x4 XTR 6.5ft bed screw with a 2.5" level. Anyways so today I meet with one of my contractors who use to own a 2010 raptor who now just bought a 2013 FX4 4x4 screw with 5.5' box stock with eco boost in it. So i asked him how he liked the eco boost going from the 6.2 and how the gas was on it. He tells me its quicker but he is at 21L/100km i was shocked cause im getting 16L/100km does this seem normal?
Old 03-27-2014, 02:24 PM
  #116  
Junior Member
 
FX4-HDMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SE Georgia
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KDD555
Both great engines, can't go wrong with either one. The ecoboost has more hp & tq, accelerates faster and pulls harder than the 5.0. The 5.0 gets about the same mpg and has the v8 sound. Both are good for towing, ecoboost I give the advantage. I like them both, but I would choose the ecoboost.

Having owned a 2013 XLT with the 3.5L, I would have to disagree with the statement of both good engines. It may produce more HP/Torq and a little better milage, but does have issues (example: hard excel and I would have loss of power, engine shudder and check engine would start flashing). I now have the 5.0L in aFX4, and can honestly say it's a much better with about a mile or two less on MPG.
Old 03-27-2014, 03:16 PM
  #117  
Senior Member
 
130428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,923
Received 708 Likes on 486 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gravelley
so thought i would throw this little story up. So to start I have a 2012 F150 4x4 XTR 6.5ft bed screw with a 2.5" level. Anyways so today I meet with one of my contractors who use to own a 2010 raptor who now just bought a 2013 FX4 4x4 screw with 5.5' box stock with eco boost in it. So i asked him how he liked the eco boost going from the 6.2 and how the gas was on it. He tells me its quicker but he is at 21L/100km i was shocked cause im getting 16L/100km does this seem normal?
if he mostly does short trips in the city, in the cold and use the remote starter, then yes it's normal!
Old 03-27-2014, 05:01 PM
  #118  
Member
 
goneMINIcrazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 8,916
Received 562 Likes on 481 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FX4-HDMAN
Having owned a 2013 XLT with the 3.5L, I would have to disagree with the statement of both good engines. It may produce more HP/Torq and a little better milage, but does have issues (example: hard excel and I would have loss of power, engine shudder and check engine would start flashing). I now have the 5.0L in aFX4, and can honestly say it's a much better with about a mile or two less on MPG.
then you sir either are lying or got a lemon. I think the thousands of EB owners would disagree.

And what do you mean by hard excel? As in fast, twitchy, rough or what?
Old 03-27-2014, 06:36 PM
  #119  
Senior Member
 
jeffinthebag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,778
Received 336 Likes on 261 Posts

Default

He is not lying about the mpgs. The ecboost only gets 1 mph better than the 5.0 and towing they get about the same. Towing they get the same. But the ecoboost does have more torque.
Old 03-27-2014, 08:19 PM
  #120  
Senior Member

 
SteveLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Iowa
Posts: 5,193
Received 884 Likes on 672 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FX4-HDMAN
Having owned a 2013 XLT with the 3.5L, I would have to disagree with the statement of both good engines. It may produce more HP/Torq and a little better milage, but does have issues (example: hard excel and I would have loss of power, engine shudder and check engine would start flashing). I now have the 5.0L in aFX4, and can honestly say it's a much better with about a mile or two less on MPG.

Don't bump a 2 week old Ecoboost vs 5.0 thread. Seriously.


Quick Reply: Ecoboost vs. 5.0



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:54 AM.