Can I put 285's on my stock rims?
07-14-2019, 07:58 AM
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for all the replies. Maybe I'll start looking for some wider rims, was just thinking of trying to upsize a little without new rims. Gotta just get off my wallet.
07-14-2019, 08:27 AM
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK so stock rims, no lift or level, 275/70/17 or 285/70/17? What say you? Currently has stock 265/70/17s and there seems to be a lot of room left to add a little height and width. BUT, will they rub? 2011 F150 Supercab STX. I need new tires so I'm just looking to upsize a little on the cheap, without having to get different rims.
Thanks!
Thanks!
07-14-2019, 04:03 PM
#13
Senior Member
Apples - Going back to what model year?
We don't know what OP drives.
*.post#1
.
07-14-2019, 04:21 PM
#14
Senior Member
DMack] - OK so stock rims, no lift or level, 275/70/17 or 285/70/17? What say you? Currently has stock 265/70/17s and there seems to be a lot of room left to add a little height and width. BUT, will they rub? 2011 F150 Supercab STX. I need new tires so I'm just looking to upsize a little on the cheap, without having to get different rims.
Raptor -used- take-off rims can be had relatively cheap (e.g. $400 or less for a set), are 17"x8½", and 285/70x17 fit with no interference. e.g. personal 2011 FX4 (285/70x17 Firestone Destination A/Ts)
.
07-17-2019, 12:18 PM
#16
5.0 DOHC V8
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: The southern California sardine can
Posts: 3,354
Received 1,587 Likes
on
974 Posts
gDMJoe, Post #13
2004 - Given that the gen'11 (2004-2008) wheel (rim+tire) are virtually the same (excluding the Heritage).
As per DMack (OP - Original Poster) ... "2011 F150 Supercab STX with 265 70R17's"
*.post#1.
2004 - Given that the gen'11 (2004-2008) wheel (rim+tire) are virtually the same (excluding the Heritage).
As per DMack (OP - Original Poster) ... "2011 F150 Supercab STX with 265 70R17's"
*.post#1.
This oversight was corrected in Post #10, but thanks again anyway.
