Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.0 v 3.5. Which can make it from 100k miles to 200k miles with less problems

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2018, 05:41 PM
  #291  
Member
 
kepcv6871's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Yreka, CA
Posts: 94
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Smile Better comparison: 6 vs. 6

Had a 1960 F-100 with straight 6 and 3 on the tree. Loved it, but maintenance+, especially points, plugs and tires. At 58K the head cracked. Now have 2012 F-150 EB with 125K and the only mechanical problem was from a software bug that got fixed with a reflash. The EB still runs sweet and only heard good things about the 5.0. So, give me either; don't want to go back to the "good old days". Of course, if my EB should collapse at 150-200K, well ...that'll be a great excuse to get a new one.
kepcv6871 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
wizwor (03-13-2018)
Old 03-13-2018, 06:10 PM
  #292  
Junior Member
 
sprucebruce1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default sprucebruce

I hope the 5.0 v8 makes it a long ways. I bought a 2016 F150 with the 5.0liter v8. I was a little uneasy about the smaller ecoboost engine. I had a Tacoma with a 4l v6 in it and when I bought this truck I found it hard to believe that you could get that much power out of an engine that was smaller than the one I had. This question has been out there a lot, just hope I made the right decision.
sprucebruce1 is offline  
Old 03-13-2018, 06:53 PM
  #293  
TOTM November 2019
iTrader: (2)
 
Summers22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 23,787
Received 11,579 Likes on 6,196 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Danilushka
I don't see him saying denigrating the 5.0 in his post at all. He addressed the fact that both diesels, know for reliability, and the Ecoboost have turbos but the diesel reputation for reliability indicates turbos don't equate to unreliability.
That is all so just calm down, Fan Boy.
I am far from a fan boy of 5.0's. I just happen to own one. If you have seen any of my posts on the eco vs V8 debate, I am a fan of both types of engines. Many here will concure with my statement since they judge my thoughts on the subject based off more than one post. If it makes you feel better about yourself to label me or others, then have at it. But making ignorant assumptions is something that usually comes back on you and makes you look foolish.
Summers22 is online now  
The following users liked this post:
tuckgt (03-13-2018)
Old 03-13-2018, 07:14 PM
  #294  
Junior Member
 
Ed150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 7
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default 5.0 vs 3.5 which will last

Originally Posted by Rnlcomp
Really depends on how each one was maintained, turbo's do wear out and the 6 has to work a lot harder to produce power than the 8. But as I said, maintenance is the key.
.
my work truck is a 2013 xlt ext. Cab 5.0 with 119.00. My personal truck is a 2011 ext cab xlt 3.5 ecoboost. With 93000. My work truck gets better gas mileage but i drive it about 2000 miles a week. Doesnt seem to have the take off power as my 3.5 though.
Ed150 is offline  
Old 03-13-2018, 07:55 PM
  #295  
Junior Member
 
tuckgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 7
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Summers22
I am far from a fan boy of 5.0's. I just happen to own one. If you have seen any of my posts on the eco vs V8 debate, I am a fan of both types of engines. Many here will concure with my statement since they judge my thoughts on the subject based off more than one post. If it makes you feel better about yourself to label me or others, then have at it. But making ignorant assumptions is something that usually comes back on you and makes you look foolish.
I agree. I believe the 2.7EB, 3.5EB, and the 5.0 are all great engines. I own both EB's and a friend of mine has a 5.0 with 150k. They are great just depends on preference. I find it funny that people are so afraid of turbo's. Many work vehicles have 400k++ on motors with turbos and do not have the fail safes of the F150 (cooling after shut off).
I will probably buy a 5.0 just so I can put dual turbo's on it. Sounds fun.
tuckgt is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Summers22 (03-13-2018)
Old 03-13-2018, 08:19 PM
  #296  
TOTM November 2019
iTrader: (2)
 
Summers22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 23,787
Received 11,579 Likes on 6,196 Posts

Default

My brother has the 2.7 eco and my FIL the 3.5 eco. Both have been flawless. They are both around 75k miles on them and they would buy them again they said. Sure that means nothing to people on the internet. But since its my own family that has had good luck, I would buy one if it were in the truck I was wanting. I am not loyal to any engine in a F150.
Summers22 is online now  
Old 03-13-2018, 08:58 PM
  #297  
Senior Member
 
Sped20STX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Andover, MN
Posts: 140
Received 59 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Can’t wait to see what happens when Ford gets that 4 cylinder diesel in the F150
Sped20STX is offline  
Old 03-13-2018, 09:04 PM
  #298  
Member
 
UncleG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 2,124
Received 357 Likes on 262 Posts
Default

I'm waiting for the 5.0 EcoBoost.
UncleG is offline  
Old 03-13-2018, 11:15 PM
  #299  
Junior Member
 
kd5vfd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default My 3.5 ecoboost

The only thing I know for sure, I'm not going to buy another ecoboost again...my warranty had just expired and the startup noise started about a month after. I had my truck in the shop 10 times in 2 separate dealerships before it was fixed. The dealership threw about 120 parts at it before it was finally fixed. Each time cost me my deductible. The last time in the shop was when i was out of town and the mass airflow sensor was apparently the problem that was making it hesitate...so dang frustrated with it.
kd5vfd is offline  
Old 03-14-2018, 01:40 AM
  #300  
Senior Member
 
Mark Miller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,226
Received 750 Likes on 512 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2015rubyFX4
My name aint sofaking. My numbers are real
Only real numbers are time slips from the race track I've posted mine before post them up when you get them!!!You never did answer if your friends Super Crew with the 2.7L Eco Boost is 4wd or 2wd?
Mark Miller is offline  


Quick Reply: 5.0 v 3.5. Which can make it from 100k miles to 200k miles with less problems



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:10 AM.