5.0 v 3.5. Which can make it from 100k miles to 200k miles with less problems - Ford F150 Forum - Community of Ford Truck Fans

Go Back  Ford F150 Forum - Community of Ford Truck Fans > Ford F150 Forums > General F150 Discussion
5.0 v 3.5. Which can make it from 100k miles to 200k miles with less problems >

5.0 v 3.5. Which can make it from 100k miles to 200k miles with less problems

Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.0 v 3.5. Which can make it from 100k miles to 200k miles with less problems

Old 01-27-2018, 04:34 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 66
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default 5.0 v 3.5. Which can make it from 100k miles to 200k miles with less problems

Two engines. 5.0 and 3.5 eco-boost.
Both are stock. No mods.
Both with 100,000 miles on it.

Which truck is going to make it to 200,000 with likely less problems.
Tiredofeverything is offline  
Old 01-27-2018, 04:42 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
SteveLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Iowa
Posts: 4,591
Thanked 680 Times in 530 Posts
Default

Nobody really knows and can only guess.
SteveLord is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SteveLord For This Useful Post:
James1980 (09-24-2018), stvfurman (09-24-2018)
Old 01-27-2018, 04:47 PM
  #3  
Fleet Technician
 
Rnlcomp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Big Easy
Posts: 21,144
Thanked 4,147 Times in 3,277 Posts
Default

Really depends on how each one was maintained, turbo's do wear out and the 6 has to work a lot harder to produce power than the 8. But as I said, maintenance is the key.
.
Rnlcomp is online now  
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Rnlcomp For This Useful Post:
08drenalin (03-13-2018), cwalter (02-04-2018), n2stuff (09-24-2018), Oldgoat03 (03-14-2018)
Old 01-27-2018, 04:49 PM
  #4  
TOTM Sept. '18
iTrader: (1)
 
OCMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Osceola, Indiana
Posts: 2,508
Thanked 1,095 Times in 752 Posts
Default

Depends a lot on how they were maintained.

Mike
OCMike is online now  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to OCMike For This Useful Post:
cwalter (02-04-2018), stvfurman (09-24-2018)
Old 01-27-2018, 04:50 PM
  #5  
TOTM Sept. '18
iTrader: (1)
 
OCMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Osceola, Indiana
Posts: 2,508
Thanked 1,095 Times in 752 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rnlcomp View Post
Really depends on how each one was maintained, turbo's do wear out and the 6 has to work a lot harder to produce power than the 8. But as I said, maintenance is the key.
LOL Rnlcomp beat me to it.
OCMike is online now  
Old 01-27-2018, 05:11 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
BCMIF150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 3,056
Thanked 622 Times in 426 Posts
Default

Who cares?
BCMIF150 is online now  
Old 01-27-2018, 05:13 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 311
Thanked 47 Times in 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rnlcomp View Post
Really depends on how each one was maintained, turbo's do wear out and the 6 has to work a lot harder to produce power than the 8. But as I said, maintenance is the key.
.
The 6 EB has to work harder in the sense that there are greater combustion forces within the engine because of the boost. Like a diesel, the cylinders, connecting rods, crankshaft, related bearings are designed with greater strength on a EB. I want to believe that's true because I own one. Since diesels are typically known for longevity, it's reasonable to speculate the EB is designed for longevity, too. The added complexity of turbos creates more opportunity for failure, yet diesels all have turbos, and diesel turbos are not known for high maintenance.
BadAltitude is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BadAltitude For This Useful Post:
2017bluetruck (03-17-2018), friesbruh (03-16-2018)
Old 01-27-2018, 05:23 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,441
Thanked 401 Times in 256 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tiredofeverything View Post
Two engines. 5.0 and 3.5 eco-boost.
Both are stock. No mods.
Both with 100,000 miles on it.

Which truck is going to make it to 200,000 with likely less problems.
.




Odd question since you just bought your truck.....itís kinda late, eh? I mean that in the sense that it would have been better to ask just before, rather than just after, buying the truck.




.
Kingofwylietx is online now  
Old 01-27-2018, 05:24 PM
  #9  
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 82
Thanked 22 Times in 14 Posts
Default

All things being equal, and assuming all variables controlled, the answer is very clearly the NA 5.0. However, will most owners keep their trucks that long? I plan to, and this did factor into my purchase decision, but my towing/hauling needs also provided me with a bit more flexibility. If I were living at elevation and towing 8k lbs. on a weekly basis, projected reliability 6-7 years from now wouldn't outweigh my current needs.
CityHunter is offline  
Old 01-27-2018, 05:25 PM
  #10  
Busted Floppenflappers
 
Apples's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,707
Thanked 395 Times in 323 Posts
Default

Who cares?
The OP seems to have already purchased an EcoBoost and is now having second thoughts.

Unless he's willing to go right back to his dealer and trade for a 5.0, I agree: What's the point?

Either engine can display reliability. The 3.5 Eco pulls harder, but the 5.0 makes more power (through the '17 model year, at least). Enjoy the truck!
Apples is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 5.0 v 3.5. Which can make it from 100k miles to 200k miles with less problems


Contact Us Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

© 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: