Topic Sponsor
General F150 Discussion General Ford F150 truck discussions and questions
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Which Scab doors would you want on the next F150 remodel?
The same current scab door design
36.76%
Independent, regular doors with exterior handles like Ram has for their extended cabs
19.12%
Doesn't matter to me, I only want to buy a Screw
38.24%
I'm one of those rare breeds that like Reg Cabs so doesn't matter to me either
5.88%
Voters: 68. You may not vote on this poll

2014 MY Rear Doors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-2012, 03:33 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
rbrais's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CT
Posts: 2,751
Received 100 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cegan1825
See, I've heard that both ways. I've heard people say exactly what you did that they like it cause it's convenient for cleaning and loading. But I've also heard people say that they hate it because it's extra burdensome trying to load people or stuff because of the design. It all depends on whether you have to park close to another vehicle or another object (wall, post, whatever) as to whether it's convenient or a burden.

I remember when I used to ride in my ex's scab it sucked whenever we'd go somewhere that we had no choice but to park next to other cars because we would all have to do the "supercab shuffle" to get people and stuff loaded/unloaded. And when you wanted to go in the backseat for some fun, it took some maneuvering to either get in the back and then try to reach all the way forward and out from the backseat to shut the front door or you had to climb over the console into the backseat. In both of those type situations normal backseat doors are preferable. However, in other circumstances, where there was unlimited space, then having clamshell doors was more convenient than having to walk around a door.

So since each type have their pluses and minuses, I wouldn't be surprised to see a fault line of opinion between those that have to park in crowded areas regularly vs people that generally can park in areas with lots of open space.
My Ranger's scab was too small to really put people back there (did a few times, but it was tight) so I used it for storage. It's a little bit of a pain to have to always open the front door first, but not bad. However, in a full size where you have people riding back there on a reglar basis, I can see how that would be a pain. Just like having a 2-door car. "Everyone out so people can get in the back."

I love my screw.
Old 01-29-2012, 12:18 PM
  #22  
Back from the dark side
 
hemigod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 556
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

When Ford put a little more room in the backseat area of the scabs in 2009, they were just as roomy or more so, than most cars. Pre 2009, the scabs were a little tight back there. I'd consider going back to a scab if the doors opened normally, although my boys are spoiled now by all the room in the screwcab.
Old 01-29-2012, 04:31 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Apeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 0
Received 67 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

I don't think it looks right to have smaller doors with an exterior handle. It would make it easier though. I wish Ford had designed the scab doors to open 180 degrees like GM. That would help a lot.
Old 01-29-2012, 05:33 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
GatorMedic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: FL
Posts: 2,494
Received 76 Likes on 51 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Apeman
I don't think it looks right to have smaller doors with an exterior handle. It would make it easier though. I wish Ford had designed the scab doors to open 180 degrees like GM. That would help a lot.
If Ford doesn't change it to regular doors for the next redesign, I would assume they'd at least make them open 180 degrees like GM's current trucks. I agree that that would be helpful
Old 01-29-2012, 07:32 PM
  #25  
Member
 
Legendsk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: USA - Kansas
Posts: 348
Received 37 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

If the rear area of a scab is used for storage / junque / tools / etc., then the existing doors are adequate and more secure.
If it is used for small people then the existing doors are safer and provide better access control.
If it is used for big people, then it's too crowded and a screw is a better answer.
Bottom line, the combination of regular cab, scab (with present design doors) and screw for full rear seating with easy access covers the whole spectrum quite well.

Other options like 3 doors, 1/2 doors, small doors with handles, etc. are not going to be a popular enough option to be worthwhile - will just drive up cost of all models.
Old 01-29-2012, 10:33 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
zmadams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Troy, Hoover, and Cullman Alabama
Posts: 642
Received 35 Likes on 32 Posts

Default

It's not necessarily the style of doors I'm concerned with, I just like having 3 sets of pillars holding the roof up in case of a roll over and I'm thinking it might help with chassis rigidity and waterproof-ness of the doors. Also I just feel like it's safer having the seat belts mounted to the body instead of the seat.
That's just the way I feel though I could be totally wrong.
Old 01-29-2012, 11:00 PM
  #27  
XLT Sport
 
Guillotine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Summerside, PE, Canada
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I voted for screw but I had 97 & 99 scabs and I went to a regular cab on my next two trucks because I found the back seat/doors more of a pia than a reg cab and 8' box. If the doors opened like a screw I may consider one in the future but my former 06 and new 12 screw made me really appreciate the full doors and big back seat.



Quick Reply: 2014 MY Rear Doors



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:23 AM.