Topic Sponsor
Super Duty Forum Talk about Super Duty and Heavy Duty Ford trucks here.

Pre-collision error. Cruise no longer working

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 04:05 PM
  #1  
cmd242's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 67
Likes: 4
Default Pre-collision error. Cruise no longer working

I just bought a 2024 F250 new a couple months ago. I put a 2” level on it and 37” tires. A couple weeks ago I had a pre-collision fault error so I took it into a ford dealership. They said I voided the warranty by putting 37” tires on it and they can’t fix the issue but still charged me $200 diagnostic fee. Is this normal? I called ford customer service and they talked to the service manager and confirmed the “aftermarket” tires caused this. Any idea how to fix it?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 04:07 PM
  #2  
digitaltrucker's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 13,811
Likes: 3,179
From: Texas
Default

Return the truck to how it was built
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2026 | 12:28 PM
  #3  
Cavementech's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2026
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act

Under the Magnuson‑Moss Warranty Act, a manufacturer cannot deny warranty coverage simply because a vehicle has been modified—unless the manufacturer can prove the failure was caused by that modification.

1. Burden of Proof for Denial

  • According to the FTC and interpretive guidance, a manufacturer must demonstrate that the malfunction was directly caused by an aftermarket modification before denying warranty coverage.
    • For instance, installing a cat-back exhaust doesn’t allow denial of unrelated failures, like an infotainment screen, since there's no causal link. [engineerfix.com]

2. Legal Text – 15 U.S.C. § 2307(c)

  • The Act states that a warrantor is not required to honor the warranty if the defect was caused by:
    “damage (not resulting from defect or malfunction) … or unreasonable use (including failure to provide reasonable and necessary maintenance).” [govinfo.gov]
    Modifications fall under “damage … or unreasonable use” only if they actually caused the failure.

🔍 How It Applies to Modifications

  • Unrelated mods (like cosmetic or performance tweaks):
    • If these mods did not cause the specific failure, the manufacturer cannot legally deny warranty for the affected part.
  • Related mods (like engine remapping or overloaded systems):
    • If there's clear causation—e.g., an ECU tune caused a transmission failure—the manufacturer can deny warranty for that specific damage.

🔑 Summary

  • The Magnuson‑Moss Warranty Act protects vehicle owners:
    • Blanket denial of warranty is not allowed just because of modifications.
    • Denial requires proof that the mod directly caused the failure.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:37 AM.