Topic Sponsor
Performance, Tuning, and (LEGAL) Racing Post discussions about increasing performance, capabilities, and racing. ****WARNING**** Street racing or illegal activities will be removed and potential bans will be handed out.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Tune, injector blending, and carbon build up

Old 06-28-2018, 10:14 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
XL-ent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: NY
Posts: 119
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default Tune, injector blending, and carbon build up

I've been considering an omega tune for my 2018 5.0. Someone had posted a car and driver article stating that ford runs a minimum of 5 - 10 percent of port injection at all times to mitigate carbon build up. Does anyone know how tuners are blending injectors or any experience with this? I know the dual injected 5.0 is too new for any practical experience. Not sure if I'm ready to roll the dice on a warranty, confounded by the 1st year for this engine...
Old 06-28-2018, 12:29 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
w00t692's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,229
Received 612 Likes on 439 Posts
Default

Ford is using majority direct injection at WOT. They bias way more towads DI than port injection, the port injectors are tiny, like 240cc.
Old 06-28-2018, 10:50 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
XL-ent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: NY
Posts: 119
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Gotcha, that's good to know!
Old 06-29-2018, 07:34 AM
  #4  
No fart cans allowed
 
BadAV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: MO
Posts: 3,390
Received 1,448 Likes on 958 Posts
Default

Just from what I have read, they use more port injection during cold starts since that apparently is when the majority of carbon buildup tends to occur. It is also used during high demand (basically full throttle) throttle application to add additional fueling/power.
The following users liked this post:
chimmike (06-30-2018)
Old 06-29-2018, 10:46 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
w00t692's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,229
Received 612 Likes on 439 Posts
Default

The mixture from the factory is 90 DI 10% port at WOT.

At cold start and rpms 2000 and below, the mixture is basically 99% port injection for getting parasitic losses down from the DI pump.
The following users liked this post:
chimmike (06-30-2018)
Old 06-29-2018, 01:49 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

I wouldn't be the least bit concerned about valve coking since it wasn't really an issue on the pure GDI fords. Any port injection at all will likely keep the valves even cleaner than they would have been.
Old 06-30-2018, 02:42 PM
  #7  
Senile member
 
chimmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Sarasota, FL area
Posts: 3,633
Received 1,048 Likes on 732 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
I wouldn't be the least bit concerned about valve coking since it wasn't really an issue on the pure GDI fords. Any port injection at all will likely keep the valves even cleaner than they would have been.
it wasn't? The Mazda MZR-DISI was a Ford design (and build....Ford stamped all over everything on that motor) and it had horrendous valve carbon buildup. 60k miles or so and you'd need to walnut blast the valves to get it off. So the 3.5EB gen1 never had valve carbon buildup issues?
Old 06-30-2018, 03:30 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

Ford holds some interesting patents to address carbon buildup on GDI engines without port injectors. I don't have first hand proof of which engines ford used it on but there are far more 3.5 eb's on the road than most, maybe any, other GDI engine and very few actual reported problems since they came out in 2011. Seems like way more have broken con rods and windowed blocks than coked up valves.
Old 06-30-2018, 04:07 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
w00t692's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,229
Received 612 Likes on 439 Posts
Default

The ecoboost doesn't have issues with coking up intake valves. The MS3 did but it wasn't an ecoboost. Either way it's irrelevant with the port injection.
The following users liked this post:
chimmike (06-30-2018)
Old 06-30-2018, 04:57 PM
  #10  
Senile member
 
chimmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Sarasota, FL area
Posts: 3,633
Received 1,048 Likes on 732 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
Ford holds some interesting patents to address carbon buildup on GDI engines without port injectors. I don't have first hand proof of which engines ford used it on but there are far more 3.5 eb's on the road than most, maybe any, other GDI engine and very few actual reported problems since they came out in 2011. Seems like way more have broken con rods and windowed blocks than coked up valves.
Probably so, but a lot of folks aren't pulling intake manifolds on the 3.5EB to check the valves. Carbon buildup won't necessarily result in failure but it certainly affects performance. I know Mazda on the skyactiv motors superheats the intake air via EGR to prevent carbon buildup on start now.

That's part of the reason I got the 2nd gen 3.5EB....port injection to combat any potential carbon buildup.

I also know Switzer (GTR modifying experts) swapped out port injectors on their raptor project and made some good power with bigger turbos.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Tune, injector blending, and carbon build up



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:52 PM.