Topic Sponsor
Performance, Tuning, and (LEGAL) Racing Post discussions about increasing performance, capabilities, and racing. ****WARNING**** Street racing or illegal activities will be removed and potential bans will be handed out.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Intake Manifold for 2018 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2020 | 09:39 PM
  #81  
blue5.0's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 213
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Ginder
Would you mind sharing either here or PM the PIDs recommended? I have a config file I created to include Ethanol %, FPM %, MAF Counts so far.
I'll message you.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2020 | 09:56 PM
  #82  
Red barren's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 209
Likes: 42
Default

Originally Posted by isthatahemi
Sold both my 5.0's and all the parts, The 2018 mani on my 2016 was a total and complete waste of time based on the measured results. My fastest times were on the stock mani with my 2016. The 2018, I never mani swapped it, it was a turd and in the shop constantly, and now it's gone.
ah,I see. Yeah I was disappointed I didn’t hold out TIL 2018 before I bought my 2017 until I heard all the problems 18 and up 5.0s were having. Sorry to hear you were one of them.
you say the lock outs are a sham and not needed? Just curious if upgraded to a 2018 mani if I have to do this or not. A company offers ported 18 truck manifolds,but with lockouts.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2020 | 10:15 PM
  #83  
alowdime's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 15
Likes: 1
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Red barren
ah,I see. Yeah I was disappointed I didn’t hold out TIL 2018 before I bought my 2017 until I heard all the problems 18 and up 5.0s were having. Sorry to hear you were one of them.
you say the lock outs are a sham and not needed? Just curious if upgraded to a 2018 mani if I have to do this or not. A company offers ported 18 truck manifolds,but with lockouts.
You don’t need the lockouts. Zip ties hold up fine or you can make your own really easy.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2020 | 01:21 PM
  #84  
w00t692's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 2,229
Likes: 613
From: Louisiana
Default

Wouldn't lock out a bolt-on truck anyways. You'd lose low end and mid range throttle response.

Last edited by w00t692; Apr 15, 2020 at 01:25 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2020 | 01:44 PM
  #85  
alowdime's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 15
Likes: 1
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by w00t692
Wouldn't lock out a bolt-on truck anyways. You'd lose low end and mid range throttle response.
Do you have a GT manifold?
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2020 | 04:02 PM
  #86  
Red barren's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 209
Likes: 42
Default

Originally Posted by w00t692
Wouldn't lock out a bolt-on truck anyways. You'd lose low end and mid range throttle response.
yeah that’s a hard no on low and midrange thanks. So basically all A guy would have to do is swap in the 18 intake and datalog for the tuner. So I guess there’s no way to tell if there would be gains down low and mid range until someone takes the plunge. No real world data out there as far as I can tell. In fact,from your post it almost sounds like it would hurt performance in that range with or without lockouts.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2020 | 07:51 PM
  #87  
isthatahemi's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,041
Likes: 1,117
Default

Originally Posted by alowdime
You don’t need the lockouts. Zip ties hold up fine or you can make your own really easy.
Or, if you leave the vacuum actuators disconnected they are spring loaded open.....No zip ties or anything else required. Not sure why that myth permeates the internet.


Reply
Old Apr 15, 2020 | 11:09 PM
  #88  
w00t692's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 2,229
Likes: 613
From: Louisiana
Default

I did not say you lose mid/low end at wot, they're wide open at wot.

I'm talking about partial throttle in the mid/low end area.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2020 | 08:28 PM
  #89  
isthatahemi's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,041
Likes: 1,117
Default

The MGIM mani loses power pretty much everywhere below 4K, *****EDIT - on the 2nd gen truck***and doesn't make more until well clear of 5K rp, vs the 2nd gen truck mani. It's a high revving short runner manifold, that's what they do. I hated the way I lost the midrange hit from the stock mani

If I had to guess / offer an opinion, the 2018 truck mani would likely be a toss up, it has longer runners, but they are quite large, so there is a loss of velocity. Just my opinion on the latter, the former is fact, to what degree is the only debate.

Last edited by isthatahemi; Apr 19, 2020 at 01:40 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2020 | 08:03 PM
  #90  
w00t692's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 2,229
Likes: 613
From: Louisiana
Default

Well it's honestly unquestionable, most 18+ 5.0 trucks pick up 3 mph in the 1/4 and 3 to 4 tenths going to an 18 GT manifold. The manifold definitely is better if you're out running the thing lol.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:32 AM.