Topic Sponsor
Performance, Tuning, and (LEGAL) Racing Post discussions about increasing performance, capabilities, and racing. ****WARNING**** Street racing or illegal activities will be removed and potential bans will be handed out.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Datalogging spark advance question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2019, 07:29 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
blue5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,849
Received 212 Likes on 174 Posts
Default Datalogging spark advance question

I was just reviewing a log I just recorded and noticed that at WOT in the mid-higher RPM range I was seeing knock readings of about -5. Does that mean the computer is adding additional timing in? My assumption would be that my tuner could safely advance the spark/timing on this tune? Timing is 27.5 at Wot FWIW.
Old 02-04-2019, 09:30 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
BadCon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,037
Received 366 Likes on 250 Posts
Default

Yes, negative knock readings indicate the computer is adding timing. There is a preset maximum as determined by the tune, and I'd trust the tuners judgement on that.
Old 02-04-2019, 09:41 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
blue5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,849
Received 212 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BadCon
Yes, negative knock readings indicate the computer is adding timing. There is a preset maximum as determined by the tune, and I'd trust the tuners judgement on that.
Thanks for the response. I always go with what they say. I just want to understand the tuning and datalogging a little more.
Old 02-04-2019, 10:35 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
BadCon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,037
Received 366 Likes on 250 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blue5.0
Thanks for the response. I always go with what they say. I just want to understand the tuning and datalogging a little more.
Just to ease that part of your soul that's always going to want more, you are at the upper limit of acceptable timing with pump gas on a street car. Its not a dangerous level, but is about as high as you'd want to go without E85. E85 will buy you a few degrees more timing, but 27.5 degrees is healthy on 93 pump gas. Sounds like a good tune if its showing -5 knock at WOT.
Old 02-04-2019, 10:42 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
blue5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,849
Received 212 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BadCon
Just to ease that part of your soul that's always going to want more, you are at the upper limit of acceptable timing with pump gas on a street car. Its not a dangerous level, but is about as high as you'd want to go without E85. E85 will buy you a few degrees more timing, but 27.5 degrees is healthy on 93 pump gas. Sounds like a good tune if its showing -5 knock at WOT.
I definitely like to hear that and that's the info I'm looking for. This isn't my go fast tune, so not a huge concern. This is a 93 tune but I use e85 pretty frequently.
Old 02-05-2019, 04:56 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Spooled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 371
Received 155 Likes on 93 Posts

Default

Also, it shows that you're getting good quality fuel. Badcon is right on the money about that much timing on 93.
Old 02-05-2019, 05:04 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
blue5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,849
Received 212 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spooled
Also, it shows that you're getting good quality fuel. Badcon is right on the money about that much timing on 93.
Glad to hear. Thanks for the reply. I've been nothing but happy with MPT. I'm just trying to better understand all of these PIDs that they have me log.
Old 02-05-2019, 05:17 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
w00t692's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,229
Received 612 Likes on 439 Posts
Default

I've seen the add timing up to 30 degrees letting the knock sensor add it on it's own. The difference in power between 28 and 30 degrees of timing is under 8 horsepower, so it's not a big deal either way.
Old 02-05-2019, 05:42 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
blue5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,849
Received 212 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

I've read that maf flow rate x 10 is a pretty good indication of crank HP. Any truth to this?
Old 02-07-2019, 12:43 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
w00t692's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,229
Received 612 Likes on 439 Posts
Default

yeah and then multiply it by .85 to get a more realistic number for the wheel horsepower.


Quick Reply: Datalogging spark advance question



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:02 PM.