Topic Sponsor
Performance, Tuning, and (LEGAL) Racing Post discussions about increasing performance, capabilities, and racing. ****WARNING**** Street racing or illegal activities will be removed and potential bans will be handed out.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.0 sport truck - 2wd vs 4wd

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-2019, 01:12 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
marshallr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,223
Likes: 0
Received 1,287 Likes on 903 Posts
Default

There are no real downsides to 4X4.

-lower initial cost (about $4k)
They cost a bit more initially, but retain their value better over time. A fellow can spend a lifetime buying and trading up to new/newer trucks and spend the same amount of money if all were 4X4 as the guy who does the same thing buying 4X2's. Once you get past the initial cost it evens out. If you ever trade down to a 4X2 and try to go back to a 4X4 it will burn you up with the poor trade value of a 4X2 going in to buy a 4X4.

-lighter
The curb weight of a 4X4 is 180 lbs more than a 4X2. No biggie.

-less parts to fail
Less parts yes, but very few people operate while in 4X4 enough to wear out those parts. My truck has 77,000 miles on it. I might have 2000 miles in 4X4 and I use it more than most. The people who break 4X4 parts are the ones beating the crap out of them "playing" off road. Drive it responsibly, use 4X4 when needed and you'll never wear out any parts that a 4X2 wouldn't wear out.

better ride quality?
-better fuel economy
I'll lump these together. There are those guys who put on the monster mud tires and their trucks ride quality and fuel economy take a hit. If you run sensible tires on a 4X4 there is no measurable difference in either fuel economy or ride. Very little real difference off road.

I just returned from a 4100 mile road trip to, and all over Colorado. We took my 11 year old grand daughter to experience the mountains and state. My 2014, 4X4 Screw with 5.0 and 3.55 gears pulled 12,000' passes with ease. I got 19.3 mpg for the trip and as much as 21.1 mpg on one tank in the mountains where I was able to coast for long distances. And I had to use 4X4 3-4 times even in June to get through 2-3' snow banks on lightly traveled roads that had not been plowed yet. On the last leg of the trip I drove the 1053 miles in one day. 21 hours total with a couple of stops. Spent about 2 hours eating and going into Cabelas in Kansas City. I couldn't have done that without a comfortable ride.
The following users liked this post:
TX-Ripper (06-23-2019)
Old 06-18-2019, 03:03 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
BadCon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,037
Received 366 Likes on 250 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by w00t692
I can do just about every bit of what a 4wd does on the street just by running a purpose tire. I'm ok with that downside honestly. Main downside to not having 4wd imo is not being able to take off decently when it's wet outside without doing a 180 lol.
Even with 4wd, if its wet out I can't get on it otherwise I'll crab walk into the ditch. It may not be a 180, but it'll lateral right off the roadway lol...kinda cool really :p
Old 06-18-2019, 03:35 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Threeper88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,041
Received 355 Likes on 201 Posts
Default

I was under the idea the 4wd was closer to 400 lbs. more. 180 lbs. sounds a lot better.
Old 06-18-2019, 04:18 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
w00t692's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,229
Received 612 Likes on 439 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Threeper88
I was under the idea the 4wd was closer to 400 lbs. more. 180 lbs. sounds a lot better.
Honestly having seen a few different truck weights it seems closer to 300 lbs.
The following users liked this post:
isthatahemi (06-24-2019)
Old 06-18-2019, 04:19 PM
  #15  
Vroom vroom
 
5.Bro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 511
Received 415 Likes on 144 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Threeper88
I was under the idea the 4wd was closer to 400 lbs. more. 180 lbs. sounds a lot better.
According to ford, its about 264 lbs more

Old 06-18-2019, 04:23 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
rojizostang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,557
Received 260 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

I like both, but I prefer 2wd. To say a 2wd won't launch well if it's too low is really a matter of perspective (it depends on what one considers launching well). I have about a 4.5/6" drop and I can get 1.7 60' times. After the next gear swap I believe I will be in the 1.6 range.

For a 2wd to launch well however you'll need a good set of drag radials and traction bars, no doubt.

Last edited by rojizostang; 06-18-2019 at 04:28 PM.
Old 06-18-2019, 05:11 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
yonson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 196
Received 75 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rojizostang
I like both, but I prefer 2wd. To say a 2wd won't launch well if it's too low is really a matter of perspective (it depends on what one considers launching well). I have about a 4.5/6" drop and I can get 1.7 60' times. After the next gear swap I believe I will be in the 1.6 range.

For a 2wd to launch well however you'll need a good set of drag radials and traction bars, no doubt.
True, however I was meaning even lower than that, that's how much I have my 4x4 lowered and I've been between 1.67 and 1.69 every pass, I don't think my 60' will go much lower until I get a converter...
Old 06-18-2019, 05:39 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
rojizostang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,557
Received 260 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by yonson
True, however I was meaning even lower than that, that's how much I have my 4x4 lowered and I've been between 1.67 and 1.69 every pass, I don't think my 60' will go much lower until I get a converter...
I'm not running a stall converter either. A gear swap is a lot cheaper, but perhaps not as effective, but I'll be happy with it at 1.7 or less. Honestly I'm not that unhappy with it a 1.77 or so either, being that it's just a roush tvs 2300 on a gen I coyote with less than 11 lbs of boost. The truck weights 5000lbs. Ideally I would install 3.55 gears and a stall converter, but that's a lot of money, so I elected to go from 4.10's to 4.56's to get the trap rpm's at around 7k or a little better in 4th, and retain the stock converter.

Sorry about the thread hijack.

4.56's are going in tomorrow
Old 06-18-2019, 07:48 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Threeper88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,041
Received 355 Likes on 201 Posts
Default

4wd will definitely be more flexible. And I’ve learned in the past to always leave yourself options.

Pricing out the same truck with 4wd actually comes out about $5k more. Gotta pay to play though.

How about suspension? I’m fairly novice to lowering trucks. I’d likely go 2/4. Any significant difference to dropping the two?
Old 06-18-2019, 09:19 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
rojizostang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,557
Received 260 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

Now this is just an opinion, but a 2/4 drop isn't worthwhile. Too much gap over the tires and doesn't look significantly different from a stock truck. If you're going to drop it....drop it


Quick Reply: 5.0 sport truck - 2wd vs 4wd



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:27 PM.