Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Would you want the new 7.3 V8 in the F150?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-11-2019, 08:57 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
ModularFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 925
Received 295 Likes on 207 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by djfllmn
ford tried this before..with the 6.2, and they barely moved any of them except the raptor
Thats because my 6.2L was a crazy upcharge over the other engine options.....and it was trim limited. You had to get a Platinum, Limited, or Raptor most years. Had to spend $55,000 at a minimum to get in a 6.2L.

Some years they added it to the order banks for FX4 and Lariat, but again order only. They could have sold many more with rebates and less limitations.

Last edited by ModularFord; 02-11-2019 at 09:13 PM.
Old 02-11-2019, 08:57 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Takeda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 2,562
Received 620 Likes on 434 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WarSurfer
Just because it's a large displacement engine doesn't mean it will be slow revving. I had a 496 that wound up like a small block and would hold 8grand all day. It's all in how you build it. With the right cam(s) and heads you could have 650hp on pump gas easy.
Not without forced induction!

Old 02-11-2019, 08:59 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
ModularFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 925
Received 295 Likes on 207 Posts
Default

I’d buy a 7.3 F-150 YES!
Old 02-11-2019, 09:06 PM
  #24  
Senior Member

 
SteveLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Iowa
Posts: 5,193
Received 884 Likes on 672 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ModularFord
Thats because my 6.2L was a crazy upcharge over the other engines....and it was trim limited. You had to get a Platinum, Limited, or Raptor most years. Had to spend $55,000 at a minimum to get in a 6.2L.

Some years they added it to the order banks for FX4 and Lariat, but again order only. They could have sold many more with rebates and less limitations.
You could get the 6.2 in an XLT. But it was a $4000+ upcharge over the Ecoboost even I think.
Old 02-11-2019, 09:09 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
ModularFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 925
Received 295 Likes on 207 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SteveLord
You could get the 6.2 in an XLT. But it was a $4000+ upcharge over the Ecoboost even I think.
Correct but only for 2 model years in the lower trims as an order item and a hefty upcharge.

The pricing and availability of the 6.2L engine was like the current 3.5 H.O eco. They don’t move many of them either.

Last edited by ModularFord; 02-11-2019 at 09:14 PM.
Old 02-11-2019, 10:03 PM
  #26  
Utility Guy
 
cgarison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 232
Received 41 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spooled
Ford will never put the 7.3 in a half-ton truck or a car. If they did, it would affect CAFE. It's specifically a heavy duty engine because of this reason.
I agree, but Ford could always come out with a 5/8 ton "Heavy Half" version of the HDPP truck with the 7.3 motor, 9.75 rear diff, and HPP frame. That would make for a one heck of a work truck package for contractors who need to tow large and haul heavy but might not need all the heft of a Super Duty.

But with that said, they are lowering the height of the F250 by an inch so maybe my thought on a "F200" is worked into the bigger SuperDuty.
Old 02-11-2019, 10:29 PM
  #27  
Member
 
wantanewf150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Boca Raton FL
Posts: 45
Received 14 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cgarison
I agree, but Ford could always come out with a 5/8 ton "Heavy Half" version of the HDPP truck with the 7.3 motor, 9.75 rear diff, and HPP frame. .
love it! where do I sign the papers and give you my money!

it would be neat and honestly i would probably have picked it over 5.0 or 3.5 EB (as long as it wasn't stupidly priced) if I had the option since they are really pushing this engine to be highly reliable since it's for heavy duty applicaitons. Ford would not only have the great 5.0 and ecoboost motors but then would also be the top dog 2V pushrod motor against gm's 6.2 which is not available across the board. I would just hope if for some tiny chance ford actually brings it to the f150 they wouldn't limit it to just higher trims. It's so cool in my opinion that you can get 10speed trans with the 5.0 or ecoboost in a XL reg cab pick up and I would hope they would continue that mentality with the 7.3 in the dream world they stick it in an F150
Old 02-11-2019, 10:31 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
andrewdod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Southern New Jersey
Posts: 1,598
Received 497 Likes on 349 Posts
Default

Hell yes! Ain't no replacement for displacement! But seriously I would love a torquey motor. My 5.0 is great and all but we all know it shines on the top end.
Old 02-11-2019, 10:31 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
BadCon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,037
Received 366 Likes on 250 Posts
Default

People think I'm crazy, but I still think that 7.3l is gonna find its way into a special edition mustang of some sort. Its possible it may find its way into a sport version of the F150 as well...

But those mentioning CAFE have a valid argument, and the 7.3l will not return good economy as compared to current F150 offerings. Additionally its gonna be heavy...

I can dream though
Old 02-12-2019, 07:51 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Ssls6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dallas/San Jose
Posts: 816
Received 98 Likes on 79 Posts

Default

That's the only way I'd buy a new F150 to replace my 2012.


Quick Reply: Would you want the new 7.3 V8 in the F150?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:17 AM.