Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Wet taction

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-2017, 06:45 AM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
16LariatFx4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 142
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DraKhen99
I have the 275/55/20 Goodyear Wrangler Adventure w/Kevlar tires on my truck. They're regular tires, not E-rated.

Like I've said before, they're good in the wet, good in the dry, and great in the snow.

-John

these are what are on my truck currently. Have never had a problem with them in the rain.
Old 09-21-2017, 09:05 AM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
phenrichs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 748
Received 110 Likes on 84 Posts

Default

General Grabber At2 on mine. Drove all day in rain last Friday and I can say no problem. Honestly aside from completely worn out tires I have never had issues with wet traction with any vehicle. Perhaps it is the way I drive or perhaps some of y'all get different rain than we do here in SD.
Old 09-22-2017, 03:35 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
SSowinski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 361
Received 46 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Silver-Bolt
This is very old school thinking. The weight balance on today's trucks is so much better than years ago. I have corner weight checked many trucks. Most come in at 52% front 48% rear. For a truck that is very good. For reference most BMW cars are 50/50. Adding weight to the back will do very little for traction. It will add more weight that you have to get stopped when it is slippery.
My 2017 3.5na 4x4 SCAB with 6.5 foot bed has a 3300lb front and a 3300lb rear weight according to the door sticker. I have larger than stock duratracs on it as well.

Does that mean I won't need sandbags in the bed it this winter?

Last edited by SSowinski; 09-22-2017 at 06:03 PM. Reason: dumb typo
Old 09-22-2017, 03:54 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
DraKhen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,164
Received 175 Likes on 141 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SSowinski
My 2017 3.5na 4x4 SCSB with 6.5 foot bed has a 3300lb front and a 3300lb rear weight according to the door sticker. I have larger than stock duratracs on it as well.

Does that mean I won't need sandbags in the bed it this winter?
Those weights are GAWRs, so Gross Axle Weight Rating. That's what each axle can support, not what they actually weigh.

With a RCSB, you should be OK, but you may want a couple of sand bags to even things out. You're at an advantage because of the relatively low power-to-weight ratio you have, you should have an easier time of maintaining traction.

Edited to add: With the Duratracs, forget the sandbags, you should be A-OK. I'm no expert and don't try to hold me accountable if you get into trouble.

-John
The following users liked this post:
SSowinski (09-22-2017)
Old 09-22-2017, 04:21 PM
  #45  
Member
 
gofish101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 87
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

The way I look at it is whether I need sand or not for traction it doesn't hurt to be prepared especially in the winter months. Just like I travel with shovel, road hazard kit if you have a problem that sand or pea gravel could be the difference between getting out of tight situation or not. On the plus side better traction and emergency traction if needed and on the minus side small hit on mpg. Seems like a no brainer to me for people in snow and ice areas.
Old 09-22-2017, 04:59 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
Mlarv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Crossville TN
Posts: 2,497
Received 578 Likes on 391 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SSowinski
My 2017 3.5na 4x4 SCSB with 6.5 foot bed has a 3300lb front and a 3300lb rear weight according to the door sticker. I have larger than stock duratracs on it as well.

Does that mean I won't need sandbags in the bed it this winter?
I basically just traded out that same truck Duratracs and all. I went two winters in the Cleveland area and a few drives across I80 in PA to NY. White outs and all I never needed extra weight. 4wd was all.
The following users liked this post:
SSowinski (09-22-2017)
Old 09-22-2017, 06:04 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
SSowinski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 361
Received 46 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DraKhen99
Those weights are GAWRs, so Gross Axle Weight Rating. That's what each axle can support, not what they actually weigh.

With a RCSB, you should be OK, but you may want a couple of sand bags to even things out. You're at an advantage because of the relatively low power-to-weight ratio you have, you should have an easier time of maintaining traction.

Edited to add: With the Duratracs, forget the sandbags, you should be A-OK. I'm no expert and don't try to hold me accountable if you get into trouble.

-John
Worst typo ever. Sorry it a SCAB, completely different configuration. But either way at least I know what the door sticker means now.
Old 09-22-2017, 06:31 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
adammjarvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 317
Received 38 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

I just moved to Portland, OR from Sacramento, CA. I love the rain and used to it from when I was younger but I haven't driven in it much for the past 14 years (Colorado, Texas border, Cali).

Needless to say I too am worried about traction and such coming from a 2015 Explorer Limited with AWD. That sucker would grip like non other and was a total blast to drive -minus the fun power of the SPORTY brother.

This past week tho I noticed the pickup does handle better than I expected but it doesn't take much to get out of traction with the 3.5 ecoboost. I'm sure the 10 speed helps a little tho..

I couldn't afford the lariat (at least didn't want to pay for it) for the stuff I'm used to in my Explorer and the 4A option. These damn F150's are so freaking expensive these days (with other brands) - it's nuts.

Here's a cheers to the PNW winter ahead of us! And hope we all make it out scratch free!!!
Attached Thumbnails Wet taction-img_1580.jpg  
Old 09-22-2017, 07:31 PM
  #49  
I like to eat.
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Bigcat1185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,797
Received 470 Likes on 325 Posts
Default

Hello, neighbor!
Old 09-22-2017, 11:21 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
Tn.Lariat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Nashville
Posts: 158
Received 45 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Honestly, I've been quite impressed with OEM Good/years. We've had a lot of rain this year and have found them to preform quite well on both hwy and city roads. Not in a hurry to replace. Will have to see how they do this winter on icy roads. I have owed BF long trails, Dyna pro ats and the Good/years are better on wet roads.

Last edited by Tn.Lariat; 09-22-2017 at 11:24 PM.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 PM.