Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Should FORD make their own parts??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2018, 09:50 AM
  #61  
Senior Member
 
PAKINGRANCH13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 326
Received 48 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gone postal
Sorry, sunshine, I currently manage in a Union environment, am a former Union official, and deal with the CBA constantly. Cost of labor is the main driver in most companies simply because employees are expensive, and pay is only one piece of the compensation package. I have far fewer headaches with the CBA than I do with federal law.

Ford won't compete in the parts market because it makes no business sense from a standpoint of machinery utilization, and makes more sense for them to design using spec parts inside their unique castings. I used Timken as an example earlier for good reason: The same bearings used in a Ram 1500 front end were used in the F-150, the difference in the parts was the housing casting. Makes more economic sense for Timken to make one bearing meeting the spec for several manufacturers than it does for Ford to make theirs, requiring the machinery, real estate and overhead for a bearing factory, and Chevy to do the same, and FCA to do the same, ad nauseum. Maximizing cycles and ROI on machinery provides far more of an economic reason for not manufacturing bespoke parts than labor costs ever will.
Haha Sunshine! Haven’t heard that in forever. I agree completely that there are many factors why they don’t manufacturer there own parts. As a Ford stock holder, I am happy they do not!!

Old 05-13-2018, 09:51 AM
  #62  
Senior Member
 
mrv99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 432
Received 113 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

So how do we unfollow these threads again???

No response please just kidding
Old 05-13-2018, 12:12 PM
  #63  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Pioneer74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Dearborn, Mi
Posts: 5,448
Received 3,324 Likes on 1,967 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by toddstang
Again, like I posted, you're wrong. New UAW workers make less, with less benefits. Wanna read 500 pages telling you about it?
They will grow into their wages, just like every other new hire since 1993. The only difference is they don't get ia pension, and legacy workers don't get a 401k match.

It was stupid of the company to send us that book. They could have handed them out at the plants and saved a bunch of money.
Old 05-13-2018, 01:13 PM
  #64  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Sherlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: South East Kansas
Posts: 1,049
Received 157 Likes on 109 Posts

Default

My original post was NOT to incite a UNION -vs- Non-Union dispute.

I was just curious as to whether it would be a "good thing" for FORD to have control over their own parts.

Until they go back to work, from what I've read there are 7,600 folks without a job. Working people are what I am concerned about.

Do I know about UNIONS ....... ??? I know about 40+ years as a UNION carpenter. I know personally that if you didn't make the grade in the field, you were laid off.
I served as a union official, and president of my local.

IMO, a UNION may "get you a job", BUT it's up to you to keep it through your own good work ethics, talent, and abilities. I have been laid off for lack of ability, talent, or whatever you want to call it.

I was trained in safety, proper methods to build a quality product, that would last and something to be proud of.

I am proud of being able to have raised 3 kids, own a home, provide insurance for my family, drive a UNION BUILT VEHICLE, and enable my kids to be able to attend college. In short, I earned my way through it all. I can assure you that nothing was "given to me", or any special privilages were provided.

Last edited by Sherlock; 05-13-2018 at 01:16 PM.
The following 3 users liked this post by Sherlock:
johnday in BFE (05-13-2018), kenv47 (05-13-2018), toddstang (05-13-2018)
Old 05-13-2018, 03:10 PM
  #65  
Okie Coupe
iTrader: (1)
 
shortride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: S.E. Oklahoma
Posts: 4,702
Likes: 0
Received 209 Likes on 172 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RL1990
ALL suppliers and Ford are privately owned. There are no government suppliers.
That is not correct Sir. There are a few Ford part suppliers that are owned by stock holders. Those are not considered a privately owned company. For example; I worked for an automobile parts supplier (Microcraft) for all three major American manufacturers. They made (at the time) all of the electrically controlled side view mirror control switches. Microcraft was owned by the Brown family that I work directly for. That's not always the case. Some companies are part of a larger conglomeration of companies that are publicly owned.
Old 05-13-2018, 03:16 PM
  #66  
Senior Member

 
gone postal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central NY
Posts: 25,669
Received 434 Likes on 289 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by shortride
That is not correct Sir. There are a few Ford part suppliers that are owned by stock holders. Those are not considered a privately owned company. For example; I worked for an automobile parts supplier (Microcraft) for all three major American manufacturers. They made (at the time) all of the electrically controlled side view mirror control switches. Microcraft was owned by the Brown family that I work directly for. That's not always the case. Some companies are part of a larger conglomeration of companies that are publicly owned.
The intended difference is between government owned/ subsidized (Citroen, airbus, with France being a socialist country) and privately owned , which includes both publicly traded stock corporations and privately held companies.
Old 05-13-2018, 08:06 PM
  #67  
Super Moderator

 
95stepside's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: corn field
Posts: 14,108
Received 221 Likes on 159 Posts

Default

Let's try and keep this thread more on the original topic and less arguing about unions, mkay?
The following users liked this post:
toddstang (05-13-2018)
Old 05-13-2018, 08:17 PM
  #68  
LONE STAR
 
KILOFINAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,005
Received 629 Likes on 432 Posts

Default

sorry to hear of your layoff notice. With just in time processes, situations like this fire have a negative impact on the workforce.

Originally Posted by Pioneer74
Funny you say that. I had a 2 week layoff notice handed to me yesterday.
Old 05-13-2018, 10:58 PM
  #69  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Pioneer74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Dearborn, Mi
Posts: 5,448
Received 3,324 Likes on 1,967 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KILOFINAL
sorry to hear of your layoff notice. With just in time processes, situations like this fire have a negative impact on the workforce.
No worries. I'm good. I don't live paycheck to paycheck. Learned that lesson long ago. I'm going to take advantage of the time off to get some projects done around the house.

All rumors aside, i don't expect it to last past the 21st. Ford can't afford it.
Old 05-14-2018, 08:44 AM
  #70  
Senior Member
 
nickf2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: IN
Posts: 468
Received 157 Likes on 110 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PAKINGRANCH13


Ford cannot compete for many reasons, you’re right. But a main one is cost of labor. Labor costs are usually the largest expense any company has.

I am against unions, and clearly you’ve never managed in a union environment or been the decision maker in a CBA negotiation.

We can agree to disagree!
When you break down the cost of a part/assembly/good, labor is far from the "largest expense". Direct Material and Variable/Fixed Overhead far outweighs the labor. Shortride (quoted below) started off on the right track. Reducing the cost of a part has to begin with raw material. If all the Big 3 are buying their Steel widgets from the same supplier, they're all leveraging that suppliers mass, bulk material pricing from their supplier. It's cheaper for Steel Widget supplier to buy 3 million pounds of steel, versus each of the Big 3 buying 1 million each. That's why final good manufacturers usually outsource common, commodity type parts and material. However, you'll see them keep complex or Intellectual property, along with final assembly, in house to give them the competitive advantage over their competition.

Part Cost Breakdown

Originally Posted by shortride
If plan correctly outsourcing can be less expensive in most cases. Raw material supply's, labor and floor space can be a very expense alternative


Quick Reply: Should FORD make their own parts??



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28 AM.