Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

REAL 3.5 VS. 5.0 power curves

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2018, 11:52 AM
  #101  
Senior Member
 
11screw50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,577
Received 482 Likes on 304 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BlackBoost
Now THAT would be killer! And I wonder how many who bash EB's for turbo reliability would buy one... lol It wouldn't surprise me if sometime in the future there's a 4.something EB that replaces the 5.0, but who knows. EB's have been the biggest sellers for a while now, but I think Ford would find it hard to get rid of a NA V8 without getting lots of negative feedback from a percentage of owners. It would be a big gamble for sure, hoping that most just accept it and don't just switch brands.
Last I knew, the EB twins beat the V8 when combined but the split was nearly even between 3.5EB and 5.0 (with the 2.7 not far behind).

I know plenty of people who will not buy an EB F150 due to some perception that there are significant issues with the engines. I've told them all that that is not the case but they insist that I am wrong.

Originally Posted by centexlimited
Its just sour grape syndrome. Die hard V8 people cant stand it when small Cubic in motors
blow the doors off them. Dig up old data, guess they could go back to 460ci days. Or
find a top fuel transplant in a F150 ????
Shhh...the 2018 5.0 beats both EB's...

Last edited by 11screw50; 04-13-2018 at 11:54 AM.
Old 04-17-2018, 12:10 PM
  #102  
Senior Member
 
Speedfreak400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 984
Received 220 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

This thread should have a CNN logo on the OP first post.
Old 04-17-2018, 01:00 PM
  #103  
Senior Member
 
gingrbredman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: SW Chicagoland
Posts: 457
Received 213 Likes on 160 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2015rubyFX4
This tells the story and goes against all the EB guys who swear they have so much more low end torque then the 5.0 for towing. This graph proves what I have been saying all along. The 5.0 has way more low end torque and can tow better then the 3.5 eb.
Well shoot, I really wish I would have been told the real story before I ordered my truck. With this one post, my world has come crashing down around me and all the knowledge I gained has just gone. I mean, really, why couldn't have I run across a single chart like this when I was doing my research?
The following 2 users liked this post by gingrbredman:
chimmike (04-17-2018), UnkLeRaRa (04-17-2018)
Old 04-17-2018, 01:14 PM
  #104  
Senior Member
 
Rontbeamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 715
Received 120 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

The stupid thing is 2015rubyFX4 just wants the 5.0 to be top dog in the truck motors and it's not. That in no way means it's not a great motor, it's just not the most powerful truck motor. There isn't a bad motor in the lineup and every motor has a fan base for various reasons. Enjoy what you purchased. End of story.
The following users liked this post:
Truckin (04-17-2018)
Old 04-17-2018, 01:18 PM
  #105  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
2015rubyFX4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,819
Received 364 Likes on 287 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rontbeamer
The stupid thing is 2015rubyFX4 just wants the 5.0 to be top dog in the truck motors and it's not. That in no way means it's not a great motor, it's just not the most powerful truck motor. There isn't a bad motor in the lineup and every motor has a fan base for various reasons. Enjoy what you purchased. End of story.
I already know it is. Thats why I bought one. I drove all 3 and the 5.0 was king in my book.
Old 04-17-2018, 01:30 PM
  #106  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
2015rubyFX4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,819
Received 364 Likes on 287 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rontbeamer
Oh for crying out loud, all this proves is you don't know how to read a dyno chart once again. It's a bad chart. They started the 3.5 EB 2k RPM and the 5.0 at 1k.
Exactly, the eb had not enough torque at 1000 rpm to graph and at 2000 rpm the 5.0 was 200 ft lbs more then the 3.5. In fact the 3.5 did not catch the 5.0 till 2700 rpm.. Oh and BTW Its not my graph, Im just reading it like you are. Someone else posted it
Old 04-17-2018, 01:47 PM
  #107  
Senior Member
 
Rontbeamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 715
Received 120 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2015rubyFX4
Exactly, the eb had not enough torque at 1000 rpm to graph and at 2000 rpm the 5.0 was 200 ft lbs more then the 3.5. In fact the 3.5 did not catch the 5.0 till 2700 rpm.. Oh and BTW Its not my graph, Im just reading it like you are. Someone else posted it
It's not how it works. Have you personally spent time working with a dyno? I have. They started the recording at 2k RPMs on the 3.5EB. It takes time for the dyno to ramp up and show the torque curve. All you are seeing here is the equipment delay and ramp up from the point it was turned on. Basically, it was a bad run or they were for this particular run were only interested in the power curve after 2k RPMs. But whatever the reason for this chart it is comparing apples and oranges. Now give it a rest. And why do you care so much? You like the 5.0 in your truck, that should be the end of the discussion.

Last edited by Rontbeamer; 04-17-2018 at 02:03 PM.
The following users liked this post:
BlackBoost (04-17-2018)
Old 04-17-2018, 03:42 PM
  #108  
Senior Member
 
dodgeman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Near Macomb, Illinois
Posts: 1,055
Received 316 Likes on 200 Posts
Default

I said it earlier and I'll say it again, its almost impossible to dyno an engine with an automatic transmission below 3000 rpm's. The transmission just downshifts.
Old 04-17-2018, 03:48 PM
  #109  
Ezekiel 25:17
iTrader: (1)
 
UNBROKEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,239
Received 2,371 Likes on 1,215 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rontbeamer
It's not how it works. Have you personally spent time working with a dyno? I have. They started the recording at 2k RPMs on the 3.5EB. It takes time for the dyno to ramp up and show the torque curve. All you are seeing here is the equipment delay and ramp up from the point it was turned on. Basically, it was a bad run or they were for this particular run were only interested in the power curve after 2k RPMs. But whatever the reason for this chart it is comparing apples and oranges. Now give it a rest. And why do you care so much? You like the 5.0 in your truck, that should be the end of the discussion.
I’ve spent countless hours on dynos. They start recording when the button is pushed. There’s no “ramping up” or anything of the sort...it’s a simple recording instrument that records when it’s told to.
Old 04-17-2018, 03:58 PM
  #110  
Senior Member
 
Rontbeamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 715
Received 120 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by UNBROKEN

I’ve spent countless hours on dynos. They start recording when the button is pushed. There’s no “ramping up” or anything of the sort...it’s a simple recording instrument that records when it’s told to.
That may be true. I have dynoed numerous times my motorcycle engine builds, no matter where we started the runs I always see a ramp up curve. I’m not an expert at it, just done it bunch of times and worked with the dyno techs looking at my power curves.


Quick Reply: REAL 3.5 VS. 5.0 power curves



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:36 PM.