Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

payload

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-2015, 11:15 AM
  #121  
Senior Member
 
nihilus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 644
Received 86 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Simply put '15 scabs/screws get about 200# more rear axle payload then even older max tow trucks with a 4050# axle since the rear end of the new trucks are that much lighter. Over 400# lighter from the looks of it!
Old 04-20-2015, 11:20 AM
  #122  
Senior Member
 
IronJoce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 864
Received 39 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nihilus
Just for reference (from source book): An older scab 4x4 max tow (such as brulaz) had 4050 rawr with 2383 weight in back leaving 1667 lbs. A 2015 has 3800# RAWR and weighs 1904 # (with 5.0) in the back leaving 1896#. If you get the 3.5tt it is still 1850# or so.
I realize this is best-case and not realistic, but the point was to compare to older max tows such as brulaz since RAWR was his bottleneck.

https://www.fleet.ford.com/truckbbas...tes_010815.pdf
https://www.fleet.ford.com/truckbbas..._techspecs.pdf
RAWR was also my bottleneck. I was able to get close to GVWR but just IMPOSSIBLE to get under RAWR that (also with 4050lbs capacity). As opposed to a 3/4 tons where you can't reach RAWR capacity but can easily go above GVWR!

They basically shaved overall 700lbs and reduce GVWR by 700lbs. They also cut about 300lbs on the rear axel but also cut 250lbs on RAWR ;-)

I'm pretty sure I saw a commercial on TV claiming they had kept the same capacity and reduced weight. This is actually why I came back to this forum!

Last edited by IronJoce; 04-20-2015 at 11:24 AM.
Old 04-20-2015, 11:22 AM
  #123  
Senior Member
 
brulaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,771
Received 204 Likes on 178 Posts

Default

So, nihilus, have I seen you over at a Titan XD forum comparing the F150 HD and the new Titan Cummins XD?

Or is that just somebody with the same moniker.
Old 04-20-2015, 11:34 AM
  #124  
Senior Member
 
nihilus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 644
Received 86 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

I realize these are all numbers for XL trucks, but I'm just using it for comparison. The '14 max tow (3.5 EB) weighed 2383 lbs in the back. The '15s weigh 1896#. That is a 487# reduction!!
'14 max tows were 4050# RAWR; The 2015 145" scabs are 3800 RAWR. Only 250# less.

So.... 487# reduction - 250# reduced RAWR = 237# greater rear payload capacity. This is with the 5.0 in the '15, but that is not the bottleneck with 3.73 gears.

237# is a significant boost over the older max tows. On an 18% pin weight, that allows for a 1300# heavier trailer or so.

Also keep in mind that 100% pin weight dos not go on the rear axle. This was simply for comparison and the absolute numbers really don't matter.
[MENTION=71433]brulaz[/MENTION] - haha thats me. Ill check this thread later this evening. It has gotten pretty thick :p
Old 04-22-2015, 09:50 PM
  #125  
Senior Member
 
pb65stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,178
Received 274 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by centex99
Anyone have a fully loaded KR without the sunroof? I know with the sunroof they're ~ 1500... Maybe since I'm waiting for '16 (Sync 3 *fingers crossed*) they'll also offer a higher payload option on upper trims/options, or perhaps add some extra payload to the max tow like they have in the past...
Then again, waiting for the 16 f150, I may get to see what engine options they'll release for the new SD (17 MY?) which may push me to wait for that... though ugh, I want a truck now, just sync 3 (with android auto/apple carplay support) to me is worth waiting on.
My 2015 KR has most options, but no sunroof. My payload is 1699 lbs.
Old 04-23-2015, 08:17 AM
  #126  
Senior Member
 
brulaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,771
Received 204 Likes on 178 Posts

Default

By the way, our local high volume dealer, just started advertising a H.D. Payload XLT. No pictures though, so it's probably not on the lot yet. Not sure if this means they've started building them already? Not much of a price discount either ... yet.
Old 04-30-2015, 12:24 PM
  #127  
LCW
Senior Member
 
LCW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 577
Received 173 Likes on 99 Posts

Default

501A Lariat 157 wb 5.0 4x4 Sport



Last edited by LCW; 04-30-2015 at 04:15 PM.
Old 04-30-2015, 01:34 PM
  #128  
Member
 
Mychalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Oregon
Posts: 80
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

5.0 Supercrew Lariat 502a 4wd with moonroof.


Old 04-30-2015, 03:25 PM
  #129  
Member
 
banjobiotic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 94
Received 30 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Wow. I've got a Lariat 502A, 3.5EB with moonroof and payload is only 1568. Does the 5.0 V8 give you more hauling power? I've also got 157" wheelbase and max tow. Starting to think that longer bed and "upgraded bumber" reduced payload by quite a bit.
Old 04-30-2015, 04:11 PM
  #130  
Senior Member
 
Feathermerchant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Euless, Tx
Posts: 2,950
Received 398 Likes on 336 Posts

Default

AFAIK longer bed is heavier -> Less Payload.


Quick Reply: payload



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:36 AM.