Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

(Partial) costs of the F150 engines & the cost of a few mpg

Old 04-14-2019, 01:26 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
kehyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 971
Received 221 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dgm67
This brings up something I've been thinking about and that is resale value. I ran my F150 which is a 2018 Lariat with 20,000 miles on Kelly Blue Book.

2.7 Engine is $31,879-$34,851
5.0 Engine is $31,723-$34,704
3.5 Engine is $32,738-$35,719

Then I went to Ford and built a 2019 with the engine options

2.7 Engine is $48,330
5.0 Engine is $49,330
3.5 Engine is $49,930
Diesel Engine is $52,330

This is the Lariat 500A with 4wd. I don't think gas money is an issue but it does seem the 3.5 is the better option if you are looking at trade in value.
Interesting, I would have expected the 5.0 to be between the 2.7 & 3.5.
Old 04-15-2019, 11:58 AM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
Napalm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Memphis TN
Posts: 2,335
Received 430 Likes on 329 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kehyler
I suppose depreciation is guesstimate-able, given that the 10-year average depreciation is known and the initial costs are known. In leu of doing that, I'll run my numbers out to 20 years, 300,000 miles and update my original post. The differences in resale value at that point should be very small.
I don't know that's going to be true and it might well be area dependent. More on this later.

Originally Posted by kehyler
I'll have to have a friendly counter argument about this .

Would you raise this as an objection?

If you wouldn't, then you're casting doubt against the ability of people to keep a budget in one case but not the other. In many cases, your prejudgement won't be accurate. I know people who internally count saving for retirement as the single most important cost to save for. It's buying your ability to live when you cannot support yourself, after all.
Object - I object to all sorts of ****. But I'm usually easy to disagree with. I'm in for a good discussion. My background however is engineering no finance so I argue with them alot because the benefit per dollar is in some cases very hard to justify. Either way mind you.

My point here - most likely poorly worded - is that outside of 3 years it's really hard to gage what fuel prices or even vehicle prices will do. Back in 07 - had you told me in under a year I would pay 5 per gallon for gas I would have laughed in your face. But even here in the SE US I was paying 5 per gallon for a while - it was insane. 2 years before that I was paying 2 or less. That's my point you have to set a price - for me when I do my sheets on a car I use the 5 year average in my area - thanks gas buddy. And it's an average I'm inputting into - so it's no random per say. It's just as possible the bottom might fall out - and gas price could plummet. It happened once before.

I also use Acar - or Fuely app to track what my fleet does on MPG's and prices I pay etc. SO I know my numbers - in my area - where I go. Not everyone does this.

Originally Posted by kehyler
Interesting, I would have expected the 5.0 to be between the 2.7 & 3.5.
So around here - for used trucks - and I was having this discussion at church just yesterday. The 5.0 is the prefered so the price is always higher used. The guy I was talking to even said the words. Well you know you have to avoid those 3 year old 2.7L - they're traded in because they're all used up. I had to explain to him that you know the common lease was 3 years or so - and today it's common for a person to swap cars every 3-4 years. It's not about used up. But I was wasting my breath.


Point is - for some resale value doesn't play on the sheet. I don't give one IOTA what the resale value is because in 10 years time it doesn't much matter but I will look at trade in - if I'm doing a vehicle swap. It depends on what I'm buying and why. In the case of the F150 my sheet didn't have any resale thought on it - and it didn't have any trade in number on it. New purchase for new need that wasn't going to go away soon. vs - new daily for me, might trade in the current one, will buy something, probably finance it because rates, and soe it's gas dollars and MX dollars of current vs fuel and finance dollars on new. No it doesn't balance out yet but it might if MX dollars or gas dollars keep going up
Old 04-15-2019, 04:50 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Ifallsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: In way too hot southern Georgia
Posts: 1,454
Received 272 Likes on 201 Posts

Default

If Guns kill people, Spoons cause Diabetes


Actually it Forks and cans/bottles that cause diabetes
Old 04-15-2019, 11:14 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Julian703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 154
Received 48 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

The massive amount of money you lose in depreciation from keeping any new vehicle for only a few years far outweighs any differences in resale value of the engines. Same goes for mpg. Buy the engine you want and you will keep the truck longer.
Old 04-15-2019, 11:25 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
ModularFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 925
Received 295 Likes on 207 Posts
Default

KBB is dependent on your ZIP
Old 04-16-2019, 09:07 AM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
mikeinatlanta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 3,269
Received 1,329 Likes on 797 Posts
Default

Running data is useless if it doesn't account for the advantages as well as negatives.

E.G. The 5.0 is a flex fuel motor while the others aren't. If you were to run the 5.0 with flex fuel price and MPG compared to premium for the EB motors it would show potential that the others don't have. Same issue with all the hp comparisons.

Regardless: The only thing this data can potentially prove is that more powerful and more desirable engines cost more money to operate, which is a big "no ****".
The following 2 users liked this post by mikeinatlanta:
acdii (04-16-2019), CCCT (04-16-2019)
Old 04-16-2019, 08:07 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
acdii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 13,828
Received 2,719 Likes on 2,056 Posts

Default

Hey when did they change from Thanks to Likes?
The following 2 users liked this post by acdii:
CCCT (04-16-2019), mikeinatlanta (04-17-2019)
Old 04-16-2019, 08:13 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
kehyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 971
Received 221 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

^ I knew you'de like that post.
Old 02-25-2020, 08:05 PM
  #49  
Senior Member

 
2015rubyFX4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,819
Received 364 Likes on 287 Posts

Default

Ill take my 5.0 over either of the v6's because of the wonderful sounds it makes
The following users liked this post:
kehyler (02-25-2020)
Old 02-25-2020, 08:24 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
Metacortex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 536
Received 100 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2015rubyFX4
Ill take my 5.0 over either of the v6's because of the wonderful sounds it makes
Former V8 guy here, loved the way Magnapacks sounded in my 4.6L Mustang GT.

However, getting a bit older and out of that phase, I love the turbo spool of my 3.5L. Its subtle yet profound.


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: (Partial) costs of the F150 engines & the cost of a few mpg



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:27 PM.