The Official 3.3L V6 Workhorse Thread
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
The Official 3.3L V6 Workhorse Thread
Maybe it's my years on a farm, maybe it's my appreciation for simplicity and efficiency, but I have come to the conclusion that a 3.3 v6 with the 3.73 rear end 2WD truck is my configuration of choice. Yet everywhere I look online, I don't see any feedback on this powertrain combination. It's like everyone dismisses it without a second thought. Can anyone that has one confirm or disprove my reasoning below:
1. Engine reliability should be great. Engine has dual injection and no turbos. With the 3.73 rear end it should rev easily and not be very stressed. I love the concept of the 2.7, but it worries me that it will start leaking oil like a sieve after many years with the aluminum and iron construction and all the sealing points. Plus given the 3.3 is the fleet workhorse engine, I don't imagine Ford would risk a weak design and damage their brand reputation with the "working" crowd.
2. Proven transmission. My current 2010 5.4 has the 6 speed and I think it is a great transmission. They seem to not have any issues with maintenance and I believe they are considered bulletproof. Maybe they did the same great job on the 10 speed... but there is a risk right?
3. Great fuel economy... I could see this engine giving consistent low fuel consumption. I know the 2.7 should be better... but sometimes having those turbos means you make use of them and then mileage will vary greatly. Plus that 2.7 worries me that it will start leaking oil like a sieve after many years with the aluminum and iron construction and all the sealing points.
4. Maintenance is less with no turbos to require more frequent oil changes and you can run a cleaner through the intake in case there is still any carbon build up down the road.
5. Weight should be that much lower with the small engine up front making any configuration closer to a 50/50 weight split than with a bigger engine.
6. I am one of those crazy lovers of just RWD. The F150s now are that much more balanced with weight front and rear and having the available E locker means you don't have to really worry about getting stuck. I know I have never even come close to stuck with my 2010 with a Truetrac rear diff. Plus with the lower weight and less drivetrain losses, this should help the 3.3 feel even more sporty.
Thoughts anyone?
1. Engine reliability should be great. Engine has dual injection and no turbos. With the 3.73 rear end it should rev easily and not be very stressed. I love the concept of the 2.7, but it worries me that it will start leaking oil like a sieve after many years with the aluminum and iron construction and all the sealing points. Plus given the 3.3 is the fleet workhorse engine, I don't imagine Ford would risk a weak design and damage their brand reputation with the "working" crowd.
2. Proven transmission. My current 2010 5.4 has the 6 speed and I think it is a great transmission. They seem to not have any issues with maintenance and I believe they are considered bulletproof. Maybe they did the same great job on the 10 speed... but there is a risk right?
3. Great fuel economy... I could see this engine giving consistent low fuel consumption. I know the 2.7 should be better... but sometimes having those turbos means you make use of them and then mileage will vary greatly. Plus that 2.7 worries me that it will start leaking oil like a sieve after many years with the aluminum and iron construction and all the sealing points.
4. Maintenance is less with no turbos to require more frequent oil changes and you can run a cleaner through the intake in case there is still any carbon build up down the road.
5. Weight should be that much lower with the small engine up front making any configuration closer to a 50/50 weight split than with a bigger engine.
6. I am one of those crazy lovers of just RWD. The F150s now are that much more balanced with weight front and rear and having the available E locker means you don't have to really worry about getting stuck. I know I have never even come close to stuck with my 2010 with a Truetrac rear diff. Plus with the lower weight and less drivetrain losses, this should help the 3.3 feel even more sporty.
Thoughts anyone?
The following 6 users liked this post by RacerRoo:
ebm99 (11-15-2023),
Greynite (12-05-2019),
Mickey Yelachich (04-25-2021),
Sally Hillal (01-05-2021),
TomSmith (09-30-2019),
and 1 others liked this post.
Popular Reply
12-14-2017, 06:21 PM
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
You're joking, right? Do you own one? Then why would you make an idiotic comment like that? It has 290 hp and can haul and tow just fine. The 6 speed transmission works great too. Is a 10 speed automatic really necessary? Of course not. I had a 2012 with the Eco and the turbos went out at 160k so I would never waste good money on another one. Just because the 3.3 comes with the base model XL doesn't mean it can't do anything the other engines can. I can haul more cubic yards of mulch and other items in my truck than any of you guys can with your short beds which is why I bought it. It tows great too and will cruise down the freeway just fine at 80 mph. Your "farm duty" comment is one of the most stupid statements I've read anywhere on the internet in a long time....
No need to get so defensive about your purchase, you don't need to justify it to us.
#2
Maybe it's my years on a farm, maybe it's my appreciation for simplicity and efficiency, but I have come to the conclusion that a 3.3 v6 with the 3.73 rear end 2WD truck is my configuration of choice. Yet everywhere I look online, I don't see any feedback on this powertrain combination. It's like everyone dismisses it without a second thought. Can anyone that has one confirm or disprove my reasoning below:
1. Engine reliability should be great. Engine has dual injection and no turbos. With the 3.73 rear end it should rev easily and not be very stressed. I love the concept of the 2.7, but it worries me that it will start leaking oil like a sieve after many years with the aluminum and iron construction and all the sealing points. Plus given the 3.3 is the fleet workhorse engine, I don't imagine Ford would risk a weak design and damage their brand reputation with the "working" crowd.
2. Proven transmission. My current 2010 5.4 has the 6 speed and I think it is a great transmission. They seem to not have any issues with maintenance and I believe they are considered bulletproof. Maybe they did the same great job on the 10 speed... but there is a risk right?
3. Great fuel economy... I could see this engine giving consistent low fuel consumption. I know the 2.7 should be better... but sometimes having those turbos means you make use of them and then mileage will vary greatly. Plus that 2.7 worries me that it will start leaking oil like a sieve after many years with the aluminum and iron construction and all the sealing points.
4. Maintenance is less with no turbos to require more frequent oil changes and you can run a cleaner through the intake in case there is still any carbon build up down the road.
5. Weight should be that much lower with the small engine up front making any configuration closer to a 50/50 weight split than with a bigger engine.
6. I am one of those crazy lovers of just RWD. The F150s now are that much more balanced with weight front and rear and having the available E locker means you don't have to really worry about getting stuck. I know I have never even come close to stuck with my 2010 with a Truetrac rear diff. Plus with the lower weight and less drivetrain losses, this should help the 3.3 feel even more sporty.
Thoughts anyone?
1. Engine reliability should be great. Engine has dual injection and no turbos. With the 3.73 rear end it should rev easily and not be very stressed. I love the concept of the 2.7, but it worries me that it will start leaking oil like a sieve after many years with the aluminum and iron construction and all the sealing points. Plus given the 3.3 is the fleet workhorse engine, I don't imagine Ford would risk a weak design and damage their brand reputation with the "working" crowd.
2. Proven transmission. My current 2010 5.4 has the 6 speed and I think it is a great transmission. They seem to not have any issues with maintenance and I believe they are considered bulletproof. Maybe they did the same great job on the 10 speed... but there is a risk right?
3. Great fuel economy... I could see this engine giving consistent low fuel consumption. I know the 2.7 should be better... but sometimes having those turbos means you make use of them and then mileage will vary greatly. Plus that 2.7 worries me that it will start leaking oil like a sieve after many years with the aluminum and iron construction and all the sealing points.
4. Maintenance is less with no turbos to require more frequent oil changes and you can run a cleaner through the intake in case there is still any carbon build up down the road.
5. Weight should be that much lower with the small engine up front making any configuration closer to a 50/50 weight split than with a bigger engine.
6. I am one of those crazy lovers of just RWD. The F150s now are that much more balanced with weight front and rear and having the available E locker means you don't have to really worry about getting stuck. I know I have never even come close to stuck with my 2010 with a Truetrac rear diff. Plus with the lower weight and less drivetrain losses, this should help the 3.3 feel even more sporty.
Thoughts anyone?
1. Most powerful engine offered
2. 4x4
4. Max towing package
That setup makes the truck useful for anything you could possibly need.
#3
Do whatever you want that makes you happy... That's why Ford allows us to configure our own..... If it was mine, I'd go for the most powerful engine.... Oh wait, I did...
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Texas, its a whole other country
Posts: 292
Received 85 Likes
on
49 Posts
For farm duty I think that you have a winning combination. I like the XL trucks from Ford and I like the N/A V-6 as well. The new 3.3 should be a workhorse of an engine, and I agree the 6 speed trans is bullet proof. I would still want a tow package on it but a regular cab 2wd would meet just about every need on the farm.
#5
Member
You're joking, right? Do you own one? Then why would you make an idiotic comment like that? It has 290 hp and can haul and tow just fine. The 6 speed transmission works great too. Is a 10 speed automatic really necessary? Of course not. I had a 2012 with the Eco and the turbos went out at 160k so I would never waste good money on another one. Just because the 3.3 comes with the base model XL doesn't mean it can't do anything the other engines can. I can haul more cubic yards of mulch and other items in my truck than any of you guys can with your short beds which is why I bought it. It tows great too and will cruise down the freeway just fine at 80 mph. Your "farm duty" comment is one of the most stupid statements I've read anywhere on the internet in a long time....
#6
he probably mentioned farm duty, because the OP mentioned spending many years on a farm? never really said what he wanted to use the truck for. Probably just assumed it was for working on a farm.
#7
You're joking, right? Do you own one? Then why would you make an idiotic comment like that? It has 290 hp and can haul and tow just fine. The 6 speed transmission works great too. Is a 10 speed automatic really necessary? Of course not. I had a 2012 with the Eco and the turbos went out at 160k so I would never waste good money on another one. Just because the 3.3 comes with the base model XL doesn't mean it can't do anything the other engines can. I can haul more cubic yards of mulch and other items in my truck than any of you guys can with your short beds which is why I bought it. It tows great too and will cruise down the freeway just fine at 80 mph. Your "farm duty" comment is one of the most stupid statements I've read anywhere on the internet in a long time....
Last edited by Thugzy; 12-14-2017 at 06:17 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
You're joking, right? Do you own one? Then why would you make an idiotic comment like that? It has 290 hp and can haul and tow just fine. The 6 speed transmission works great too. Is a 10 speed automatic really necessary? Of course not. I had a 2012 with the Eco and the turbos went out at 160k so I would never waste good money on another one. Just because the 3.3 comes with the base model XL doesn't mean it can't do anything the other engines can. I can haul more cubic yards of mulch and other items in my truck than any of you guys can with your short beds which is why I bought it. It tows great too and will cruise down the freeway just fine at 80 mph. Your "farm duty" comment is one of the most stupid statements I've read anywhere on the internet in a long time....
No need to get so defensive about your purchase, you don't need to justify it to us.
The following 12 users liked this post by GreenandGold831:
bryan_c (05-15-2021),
funnyman06 (12-15-2017),
iFord (01-24-2020),
irianjim (04-12-2018),
janr (03-05-2018),
and 7 others liked this post.
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I recognize the advantage of go big or go home, but I feel people miss out on the advantages of getting what you need 95% of the time. I am not looking to get a new truck yet, just doing my research as I am at a point where I know I can’t go back to a car ever and if the price of gas keeps climbing, one day it will make sense to get a newer truck for those savings alone.
I need a crew crew cab to haul my family around and for the times I need to take my dirt bike with me or overload the bed with hardwood I don’t think 300+ hp are necessary. Most times we are not working our trucks hard and sometimes when we do, we just have to keep in mind slowing down and driving smooth and gentle is all we need to do and the truck will manage fine. Somehow my dads reg cab 1994 Ram RWD with the 175hp 3.9l V6 managed to pull trailers with cows in them, and full beds of hardwood with no failures for the 16 years he had it. Admittingly it was too slow a truck, but it kind of showed me that you can work with what you have most times.
I would just like to hear from any 3.3 owners and if they find them lacking at all. if you drive a different 2018 engine and tried the 3.3 but didn’t like it, please give me your feedback. I don’t need to hear how you went straight to the 3.5 ecoboost with 4wd and a lift kit as I would actually prefer driving a modestly optioned RWD XLT with smaller 17” wheels and tires any day.
I feel there here must be more guys out there like me that have trucks for their space/comfort, reliability and ease of working on, and at the same time they try to maximize their “economy”.
I need a crew crew cab to haul my family around and for the times I need to take my dirt bike with me or overload the bed with hardwood I don’t think 300+ hp are necessary. Most times we are not working our trucks hard and sometimes when we do, we just have to keep in mind slowing down and driving smooth and gentle is all we need to do and the truck will manage fine. Somehow my dads reg cab 1994 Ram RWD with the 175hp 3.9l V6 managed to pull trailers with cows in them, and full beds of hardwood with no failures for the 16 years he had it. Admittingly it was too slow a truck, but it kind of showed me that you can work with what you have most times.
I would just like to hear from any 3.3 owners and if they find them lacking at all. if you drive a different 2018 engine and tried the 3.3 but didn’t like it, please give me your feedback. I don’t need to hear how you went straight to the 3.5 ecoboost with 4wd and a lift kit as I would actually prefer driving a modestly optioned RWD XLT with smaller 17” wheels and tires any day.
I feel there here must be more guys out there like me that have trucks for their space/comfort, reliability and ease of working on, and at the same time they try to maximize their “economy”.
The following 4 users liked this post by RacerRoo:
#10
Senior Member
I'm just going to comment on your last point. 2wd is the way to go in my opinion. After owning a few 4x4 trucks, I now enjoy the classic 2wd look and feel.
Plus, I've never actually HAD to use my 4wd, doesn't snow where I live
Plus, I've never actually HAD to use my 4wd, doesn't snow where I live