Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Non- Ethanol gas observation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2018, 10:11 AM
  #21  
Senior Member

 
volvodoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Under the missing tree
Posts: 965
Received 110 Likes on 69 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by seventyeight
Well I’m glad I posted my observations. I thought it was more the lack of ethanol than the fact it was premium that was making a difference. This makes it easy for me to start using premium from my regular gas station all the time now.

One other observation - as I said I’ve been doing this once a year for many years. With my previous ‘09 FX4 w/5.4l I never noticed any difference. But today is was obvious. My typical 70 mile round trip to town is nothing but hills and bends on a 55mph road. My old 5.4 would constantly be shifting between 6th and 5th the entire way. I would bet it would happen at least 30 times in the round trip. There was no way to lock out gears like my new-to-me Lariat. Even without locking out 6th this truck behaves much more nicely. And today it acted even better holding on to 6th all that much longer.

Thanks everyone for chiming in! Premium it is for me!

rngtntl - my choice for my small engines is non-ethanol fuel. It just so happens that the only non-ethanol available happens to be premium. I am active in a tractor forum where we talk a lot about small engine equipment also. The consensus is that using and storing non-ethanol fuel in carbureted small engines proves to be worth it.
there is a button on the gear shift that lets you lock out gears.
Old 08-19-2018, 10:50 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
seventyeight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: NW Penna
Posts: 699
Received 205 Likes on 152 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by volvodoc

there is a button on the gear shift that lets you lock out gears.
Yes, I know that. But up until 3 months ago my ‘09 FX4 had no such thing. It drove me nuts down shifting and up shifting all the way to town.

This is one on the many new features I have on my new-to-me ‘15. This one is pretty behaved even without locking out 6th - seems it will hold 5th quite nicely on its own. But on a couple certain hills I lock it out myself and am very happy that I now have that option.
Old 08-19-2018, 11:29 AM
  #23  
TOTM November 2019
iTrader: (2)
 
Summers22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 23,790
Received 11,580 Likes on 6,196 Posts

Default

I have tried 3 tanks of 87 ethanol free just to see if mpg's increased. They didn't. So after seeing that 91 with ethanol and 87 without ethanol is the same price, I usually just put in the 91. My truck is a 5.0 flex fuel equipped vehicle.
Old 08-19-2018, 12:19 PM
  #24  
Junior Member
 
BCate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: NW IL
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Boost with high octane

I'm new to the 3.5L eco and the forum for that matter. I see a lot of discussion and both good and mis information on ethanol vs high octane vs mileage.

In my mind, high octane fuels should allow higher boosts=more compression. I have a boost gauge in my 7.3 but haven't seen much about that on an ecoboost.

Has anyone measured actual boost pressure differences on high octane vs 87 fuels? Is there an easy aftermarket A pillar add on for the F150?

Thanks.

BCate
'17 3.5L/10sp xlt
Old 08-19-2018, 08:43 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Blackbuzzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 728
Received 273 Likes on 167 Posts
Default

Have not read entire thread, but, how does one know if its really ethanol free?

No state out there is testing for this like they do pumped volumes of gasoline.

I've tried it with no differences observed.

I also have stored ethanol-blend gasoline in clear containers (test) for one yr with and without preservative. And it takes almost an entire year before any visible suspended solids begin to form. Preservative Stabil use made no difference.

Maybe I'll post pics someday.

Last edited by Blackbuzzard; 08-19-2018 at 08:46 PM.
Old 08-20-2018, 12:39 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Ryan_2020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Northern BC
Posts: 807
Received 199 Likes on 156 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blackbuzzard
Have not read entire thread, but, how does one know if its really ethanol free?

No state out there is testing for this like they do pumped volumes of gasoline.

I've tried it with no differences observed.

I also have stored ethanol-blend gasoline in clear containers (test) for one yr with and without preservative. And it takes almost an entire year before any visible suspended solids begin to form. Preservative Stabil use made no difference.

Maybe I'll post pics someday.
Well if you have an OBDll adaptor and an app on your phone. For about $25 the truck will tell you what % of ethonal it senses. I get a 5% point difference between 87 octane that is ‘10%’ and 91 octane that is assumed ‘0%’. So around here there is a difference. (Reads as 15% vs 10% but who knows how accurate that is, just know it is 5 points lower).
Old 08-26-2018, 07:58 PM
  #27  
Junior Member
 
cntinuum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 15
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Munkeebutt
I have been filling up my 2.7 with Exxon 93 octane for about 8 weeks now. I notice absolutely no difference in power or mpg's. I'm about to switch back to good ole regular.
I have a 2016 2.7. My last fill was with premium in my 36 gallon tank. I have about 24k on the truck. I am getting 2-3 mpg better on premium over the 87 I have been burning. I average about 22 mpg on my trip from Vancouver, WA to Ocean Park, WA. On premium, I have made 2 round trips and I am at 25 mpg according to the trip computer. I paid about a 10% increase for the premium gas and I seem to be getting it back in increased gas mileage.

The following users liked this post:
OPsDad (08-26-2018)
Old 08-26-2018, 08:13 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
OPsDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Denham Springs, LA
Posts: 206
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cntinuum
I have a 2016 2.7. My last fill was with premium in my 36 gallon tank. I have about 24k on the truck. I am getting 2-3 mpg better on premium over the 87 I have been burning. I average about 22 mpg on my trip from Vancouver, WA to Ocean Park, WA. On premium, I have made 2 round trips and I am at 25 mpg according to the trip computer. I paid about a 10% increase for the premium gas and I seem to be getting it back in increased gas mileage.
On my second tank of 93, and my results are similar to these, but in both cases a couple of mpg less - but I have less than 1200 miles, so I think break-in will give me a bit more - or hope so.
Old 08-26-2018, 10:00 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Thugzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,047
Received 493 Likes on 273 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BCate

Has anyone measured actual boost pressure differences on high octane vs 87 fuels? Is there an easy aftermarket A pillar add on for the F150?

Thanks.

BCate
'17 3.5L/10sp xlt
In my 2018 i have the nGauge.... when switching between grades i don't see any difference in the boost pressures.... the only change is the amount of adv/retard spark....running 91 or higher, 90% of the time spark is advance...keep in mind im also tuned (see sig)

Old 08-27-2018, 07:46 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Ricklee4570's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bubbabiker
I agree. The higher octane is what's been noticed. 93 octane really wakes up my engine compared to 87.

Typically the 2.7L gains 20+ HP and 40+ TQ on premium compared to 87 octane. Ford published HP/TQ rating using 87 octane.
I find this hard to believe. I very much doubt you can get 20 plus hp and 40 plus torque going from regular unleaded to premium. That is a very big difference.


Quick Reply: Non- Ethanol gas observation



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:52 PM.