Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

My impression of the 3 engines after test drive.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2015, 08:13 PM
  #51  
Member
 
NHRoadking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 41
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

The most consistent thing about the Ecoboost mileage seems to be it's inconsistent.

Would love to see a test between the 2.7 and the 5.0 over the long term under the exact same conditions.
Old 02-20-2015, 09:55 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
5.0GN tow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,162
Received 211 Likes on 167 Posts

Default

I have towed with an eco in my Lincoln MKT. It does fine but the engine does attempt to hold gears too long in my opinion by progressively adding boost. This builds heat and there have been several accounts of ecos overheating under heavy load, high heat, steep grade towing. The IC is not as big as it should be for what ford asks of the eco
Old 02-20-2015, 10:27 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
MadocHandyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Madoc, Ontario
Posts: 5,800
Received 277 Likes on 193 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nihilus
This is a rather arrogant statement. It is clear from these forums that there will be a lot more 5.0 owners this time around. Why? Past 5.0 owners all have gotten 17-20 mpg. Basically where it was advertised at. It didn't matter if they had 2x4/4x4, base scab/loaded screw, 17"wheels/20"wheels, 3.31/3.73 gears whatever. Everyone got about what they expected and were mostly very happy. However, the 3.5tt owners get anywhere from 13-22 mpg. A lot wider range. And guess what, most have ended up on the bottom of that range. While it was made clear that you will take a hit going 4x4, it was never mentioned that you would take a 2 mpg hit for getting a loaded screw... or another 1 mpg for getting the 20" wheels... and another 1-2 mpg for getting the 3.73 gears. No other truck engine I know of has been this mpg sensitive to options. There were no indication of this, so what is this garbage about "not doing homework"? I imagine the 3.5tt will be a bit more consistent this time with the overall weight savings, but I think the damage has been done. Especially for all of those that got a 4x4 loaded screw with 20" rims. The 2.7tt, however will be just as weight sensitive as the 3.5tt in the last truck. Ford does not want the backlash again so they are limiting the weight that you can put the baby EB inside. Luckily, Ford has done their homework.
Ah, no. Not all past 5.0 owners have gotten 17-20. Do you guys subconsciously glaze over the posts complaining about low mileage?
Old 02-20-2015, 10:35 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
MadocHandyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Madoc, Ontario
Posts: 5,800
Received 277 Likes on 193 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5.0GN tow
I have towed with an eco in my Lincoln MKT. It does fine but the engine does attempt to hold gears too long in my opinion by progressively adding boost. This builds heat and there have been several accounts of ecos overheating under heavy load, high heat, steep grade towing. The IC is not as big as it should be for what ford asks of the eco
How many is several? I haven't seen but a handful of people on here over 4 years that have overheating issues. You seriously don't think that a 5.0 towing the same load and in the same conditions that would overheat the Eco, would overheat as well?
You're comparing your Lincoln to the programming of the 150?
Old 02-20-2015, 10:48 PM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
CurryBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Alexandria, AL
Posts: 2,408
Received 801 Likes on 490 Posts

Default

People who love 8s love 8s. Nothing wrong with that. Great motor and will last a long time.

People who love EB love EB. Nothing wrong with that. Great motor and will last a long time.

Get what you want to do what you want! I have an 8 in my car and love it, I have a EB in my truck and love it. All is claw!
Old 02-20-2015, 11:12 PM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
dave91gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Kenna, WV
Posts: 591
Received 90 Likes on 63 Posts

Default

I can only speak to my experience and they do not pertain directly as I don't have a 2015.
I had a 2012 FX4 screw 5.0 with 3.73's. Drove it about 30k before I traded on a 2014 FX4 screw Eco with 3.55's.
I live in WV so I have a lot of hilly terrain.
The 5.0 would lay rubber from a dead stop and pull all the way to redline. It pulled every hill on the interstate in 6th.
I towed three times with it. All three were towing an all steel car hauler (about 2k). The first was a jacked up Jeep TJ from Canton OH- about a 3 hour drive. Pulled in sixth on flat ground 70 mph. Would drop to 5th on the hills. Got 17 mpg towing the trailer only and 14 with the Jeep. Second was an 89 Mustang LX. Towed about 60 miles. Didn't pay attention to mpg. Had 34" Trails on it at this point. Towed great. Third was the wife's 08 Expedition. Actually picked the rear tires of the truck off the ground when loading. I figure total weight somewhere between 7500-8000 lbs. towed fantastic. Only 20 miles to dealership. Best mpg was a beach trip. 21.9 mpg (stock tires). The day I traded it the mpg was somewhere in the 16's. I loved the power that truck had. I am sure the gears helped.
My EB has 4k. I drove it 1500 miles or so before leveling and adding 34" Duratracs. For that first 1500 miles, the mpg was upper 13's low 14's. It pulled 6th obviously on the hills. But it stays in boost and sucks the fuel to do so. It has no chance of spinning the tires from a stop and has noticeable lag. Once it gets going it feels pretty good. But runs out of steam just before it shifts. With the Duratracs, it feels labored on the interstate hills more than I expected. I wish it had 3.73's. It doesn't have much pedal in 6th before it drops to 5th. I expected it to gain speed easily. Even with larger tires. Maybe I got a sick one. Regardless, it's getting tuned. I haven't towed with it yet but will this summer.
I have zero bias here. I am a Ford guy to the core. If I could do it over, I would have got the 5.0 with 3.73's. It seemed more powerful than my ECO and got noticeably better mpg. The Eco has a bit stronger midrange but less down low and at upper end of the tach. I know. Opposite of what the specs say.
I have a lease on this one (first time). When I turn it in, I will retest myself and decide between Eco or V8.
Either way, it WILL be an F150.
The following 4 users liked this post by dave91gt:
gillysmi (02-21-2015), isthatahemi (03-05-2017), Kantuckid (02-21-2015), nihilus (02-20-2015)
Old 02-21-2015, 04:09 AM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
5.0GN tow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,162
Received 211 Likes on 167 Posts

Default

I am saying that at max rated load my 5.0 does not even labor or build any noticeable change in temp running up hill on hot days. I pull a large GN horse trailer that is right at max. With the Lincoln(bash me here but it has the class III tow package) at max rated tow pulling my boat it pulls like a freight train but does warm up a bit when it begins pouring on boost to stay in 6th. If I manually knock it back a gear and bring the rpms up it does not do get as warm. Heck if you cross the blue ridge mts on a 100 degree day in the Lincoln and let it stay in boost(no trailer at 80mph) it does not overheat, or even close to it according to the gauges, but when you pull off for gas she is really putting off the heat from working in boost. My truck same conditions is much cooler, and the mpgs are very close at 19 lincoln and 17.5 for the truck which I attribute to aerodynamics more than anything else. The lincoln is awd and the truck 4x4.

I love both of the engines they are very different and both very good. Its just in lots of years of towing everything from 40 foot lowboys, to travel trailers, and boats, to horse trailers find that letting an engine pull artificially low rpms in boost or by lugging a manual tranny on a NA big block engine is not a good idea. Based on the Lincoln, and all the towing threads here where everybody brags about holding 6th gear at 2000 RPM, it seems that fords programming is putting you in a situation to build excessive heat with an undersized IC to deal with it. Eventually this will catch up either by the tranny heating up due to systemic heatsoak or by making the turbo systems fail prematurely. All these engines are new so long term life is a huge question so I guess we just have to wait and see.

Last edited by 5.0GN tow; 02-21-2015 at 04:14 AM.
Old 02-21-2015, 06:19 AM
  #58  
Senior Member
 
Snowflake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 995
Received 130 Likes on 104 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BoozeDaily
Just asking so don't take this the wrong way, but what are the pros and cons or difference to the 5.0 downshifting and the EB turbos spooling to keep it in gear? The 5.0 gets better power at a higher RPM but its there. The EB has the power down low at a huge cost to boost. Aside from towing, wouldn't these offset? I'm only asking out of curiosity. Barely any hills here at all let alone mountains so this doesn't apply to me.
I've been driving and Eco for nearly 4 years now and drove a v-8 truck for a few days while mine was in the shop. I found the shifting on the hills annoying and the Eco doesn't guzzle going up the hill in boost barely moves above your average fuel economy.
The following 2 users liked this post by Snowflake:
CurryBob (02-21-2015), iFord (04-01-2015)
Old 02-21-2015, 09:54 AM
  #59  
F150 Forum

 
tuxedoblack11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Hutchinson, MN
Posts: 2,213
Received 247 Likes on 185 Posts
Default

4 words. No replacement for displacement.
Old 02-21-2015, 10:14 AM
  #60  
Senior Member
 
packplantpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,964
Received 584 Likes on 404 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tuxedoblack11
4 words. No replacement for displacement.
Darn right. That's why engines have done nothing but shrink and get more powerful over the last 40 years.
The following 5 users liked this post by packplantpath:
CurryBob (02-21-2015), GearheadGeek (02-27-2015), iFord (04-01-2015), isthatahemi (03-05-2017), LA Confederate (03-11-2015)


Quick Reply: My impression of the 3 engines after test drive.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 AM.