Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fix the inaccurate MPG display in 2 minutes!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2019, 07:20 PM
  #271  
Senior Member
 
acdii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 13,828
Received 2,719 Likes on 2,056 Posts

Default

You need to calculate 3 or more tanks, average it out, then make the adjustment, if you do it tank by tank you wind up chasing it.

On mine I went 4 tanks, and found I am now upside down and report under actual by .3 to .4 per tank. I'm perfectly OK with that too.
The following users liked this post:
seventyeight (04-14-2019)
Old 04-22-2019, 08:39 PM
  #272  
Senior Member
 
noclutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 203
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Ok this may have been covered in the last 28 pages, but has anyone determined if the LOM is more or less deceitful under towing load partial tanks, or closer to reality on straight commuting tanks?

ie to get a good % adjustment number should calculate on a straight use or mixed use tank(s)? Or is it actually proportionally inaccurate regardless of efficiency, if that makes sense?

Put another way, will is my LOM % inaccuracy factor likely to be the same over a tank of towing, as a tank of commuting, and highway??

I'm confusing myself LOL
Old 04-22-2019, 10:03 PM
  #273  
Member
 
Race Red Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 60
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

It is inaccurate across the board.
Correct it and it should be accurate in any use, straight driving, towing, whatever.
The following users liked this post:
noclutch (04-22-2019)
Old 04-23-2019, 09:37 AM
  #274  
Senior Member
 
JCH841's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Suffolk VA
Posts: 177
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

I used to teach Marine EFI; can't imagine this is all that different. The injectors are designed to deliver a measured amount of fuel for aa given pulsewidth, The ECM uses this know relationship to estimate the MPG. if you're towing etc. the ECM will increase the pulsewidth while your miles traveled would not be affected, so the display would show a lower number. BTW, the display is a running average, so occasional towing would lower it, but not to the extent of actual usage while towing. You would have to reset the MPG display when you hooked up the trailer to get that.
Old 04-23-2019, 10:37 AM
  #275  
Senior Member
 
noclutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 203
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JCH841
I used to teach Marine EFI; can't imagine this is all that different. The injectors are designed to deliver a measured amount of fuel for aa given pulsewidth, The ECM uses this know relationship to estimate the MPG. if you're towing etc. the ECM will increase the pulsewidth while your miles traveled would not be affected, so the display would show a lower number. BTW, the display is a running average, so occasional towing would lower it, but not to the extent of actual usage while towing. You would have to reset the MPG display when you hooked up the trailer to get that.
Thats what I was wondering.

For example on my last tank I towed for 100 miles and commuted for 530 and used 33 gallons. Display for the tank said 21.7 mpg, hand calc 19.1, yielding factor of .880.

But will the factor based on that tank and subsequent reset yield accurate mpg on my next tank when only commuting??🤯
Old 04-23-2019, 11:21 AM
  #276  
Senior Member
 
MNgopher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 515
Received 178 Likes on 125 Posts

Default

As Race Red Rob put it, it is across the board inaccurate - towing, commuting, whatever. Does not matter.

In my case, I have the long term fuel mileage hand calculated with Fuel records going back to buying the truck. I set the number based on getting the average to meet my hand calculated number, and left it at that. There is still variation from tank to tank (for a ton of reasons), but as a whole, my fuel mileage is now around a few percent on either side of what I hand calculate, where before it was usually always 7-10% optimistic.

Set it once based on a good set of representative driving and forget it.
The following users liked this post:
JCH841 (04-23-2019)
Old 04-23-2019, 02:25 PM
  #277  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Kingofwylietx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,159
Received 716 Likes on 425 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MNgopher
...

Set it once based on a good set of representative driving and forget it.
^^^ This. Set it so it is more accurate and forget it. It will be much more accurate than before the change.
The following users liked this post:
JCH841 (04-23-2019)
Old 04-23-2019, 02:38 PM
  #278  
Senior Member
 
68injunhed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: SE Kansas
Posts: 705
Received 264 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Mine tracks within a couple tenths either way now, with varied driving. Set it and forget it, my correction was 961.
Old 04-23-2019, 05:55 PM
  #279  
Senior Member
 
h2ouup2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: OKC
Posts: 532
Received 135 Likes on 63 Posts

Default

Nice,

Thank you
Old 04-24-2019, 09:11 AM
  #280  
Senior Member
 
acdii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 13,828
Received 2,719 Likes on 2,056 Posts

Default

Mine is now Pessimistic. It is about 4 tenths under actual. Not going to bother resetting, I kind of like having it a bit under.


Quick Reply: Fix the inaccurate MPG display in 2 minutes!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:25 PM.