Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Falken Wildpeak A/T3W Review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-2017, 01:17 PM
  #21  
Member
Thread Starter
 
SwedishSTile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Trabuco Canyon, CA
Posts: 71
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bowhunter8
what tire size do you have? LT or SL tire? I would imagine if you're off-roading on those rocks you have an E rated version of the at3w?
LT275/65R20. E rated.
Old 02-01-2017, 01:27 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
11screw50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,577
Received 482 Likes on 304 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SwedishSTile
That has not been my experience. Rode in a friends 4x4 tacoma to do some yellow post camping in the snow. On the Dynapro's it was unstoppable.We had to get the ****** strap out to pull another taco on nittos out 3 separate times. We got rain sleet hail and snow on the way home and they were unwavering.

Dont know...

I also have a hard time when anyone rates a tire carrying the mountain snowflake rubbish in the snow. If the Canadian government says they are good enough for winter travel in Canada, a country that requires winter tires be fitted to your car in parts of the country, then its hard to imagine its "rubbish". Everything I have seen of them has been impressive anyway. I would not hesitate to purchase them.
They came on my truck. I was not impressed with them last winter and am less impressed this winter. Oddly enough, tire rack and the manufacturer's website have the size that came on my truck listed as not rated for severe snow although an email to the manufacturer resulted in a response that all sizes are rated for severe snow duty. That certainly could affect my impression of them if other sizes perform better for some reason.
Old 02-01-2017, 01:49 PM
  #23  
Member
Thread Starter
 
SwedishSTile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Trabuco Canyon, CA
Posts: 71
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 11screw50
They came on my truck. I was not impressed with them last winter and am less impressed this winter. Oddly enough, tire rack and the manufacturer's website have the size that came on my truck listed as not rated for severe snow although an email to the manufacturer resulted in a response that all sizes are rated for severe snow duty. That certainly could affect my impression of them if other sizes perform better for some reason.
Thats interesting. The Goodyear Wrangler AT Adventures w/ kevlar that came with my truck were not rated either, however in general that line of tires are rated for severe weather. Its some game the manufacturers play. When they develop a tire for a vehicle they tune the tread pattern a bit for NVH and the carcass as well. I think they dont want to spend the time and money to re qualify the tire so they leave the rating off. I would guess that typically the tire will perform almost identically to the generic tire they sell in the aftermarket. Maybe not in all cases.

For example, the goodyears on my truck chipped and chunked horribly. Reviews of that model of tire suggest they resist this behavior very well. Perhaps the non OE specific ones do.

Another thought: My experience with the Hankooks have been on much lighter and better balanced vehicles than the f150 (Jeep, 4runner, fj60). Maybe they are just not up to the task when it comes to a 5000lb vehicle with 60% of its weight over its front tires.

I have run the older version of this tire from hankook on a couple of vehicles and they served me well. My experience with the redesigned tire has been positive.
Old 02-01-2017, 02:44 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Gene K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,880
Received 702 Likes on 505 Posts
Default

I have a set of these on the Superduty. I find them to be an excellent tire for a do everything tire. Good sidewall strength and toughness, good in rain and snow, decent in mud although they do pack in red clay. Quiet for a LT All Terrain. They don't wear as well as Michelin's but they are cheaper and Michelin's usually get so hard at 50% I change them anyway.
Old 02-01-2017, 03:09 PM
  #25  
No fart cans allowed
 
BadAV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: MO
Posts: 3,416
Received 1,465 Likes on 971 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SwedishSTile
That has not been my experience. Rode in a friends 4x4 tacoma to do some yellow post camping in the snow. On the Dynapro's it was unstoppable.We had to get the ****** strap out to pull another taco on nittos out 3 separate times. We got rain sleet hail and snow on the way home and they were unwavering.

Dont know...

I also have a hard time when anyone rates a tire carrying the mountain snowflake rubbish in the snow. If the Canadian government says they are good enough for winter travel in Canada, a country that requires winter tires be fitted to your car in parts of the country, then its hard to imagine its "rubbish". Everything I have seen of them has been impressive anyway. I would not hesitate to purchase them.



They dont hydroplane at all. They are confident and stable at speed in the rain. However, getting moving I get a lot more slip out of them then I would expect even with 200lbs of sand in the bed. We got a TON of rain, more than enough to wash all the grime off the roads and the tires still did not hook up as I would expect. I stepped the back out getting on an onramp at completely reasonable speeds even for wet conditions. You might have to re-calibrate your right foot a bit in rainy conditions.

I would not hesitate to buy these again for what I use them for. If you are doing less offroading then me, I might look at the dynapro's.
This pretty much mirrors my experience so far with the Dynapro ATMs. I currently have 13k miles on the truck.
Old 02-07-2017, 06:47 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
13_F150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 579
Received 104 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Should I be jumping to get Falkens @ $213 a piece for 305/55/20? Or is that a standard price. Everything else I see in that size is around $300.

Last edited by 13_F150; 02-07-2017 at 06:55 PM.
Old 07-11-2017, 10:39 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
mrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Newfoundland Canada
Posts: 156
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

I'm considering these or the Duratracs in 275/60/20 for their winter rating.
Old 07-11-2017, 11:44 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
hidesert cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 566
Received 148 Likes on 92 Posts

Default

Those falkens look like a dynapro copy. The dynapros are the best tires I have owned, ran 2 sets of them and my 2017 will have them too. They work great but if you get a p series tire better change them when they hit the last 1/4 of tread if running gravel roads. Across the board Goodyear is the worst tires I have owned, the set that came on my 2014 were done at 23k. My wife's van had a strange pull that was caused by the Goodyears Will. Not own them.
Old 07-11-2017, 12:02 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
11screw50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,577
Received 482 Likes on 304 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by hidesert cowboy
Those falkens look like a dynapro copy. The dynapros are the best tires I have owned, ran 2 sets of them and my 2017 will have them too. They work great but if you get a p series tire better change them when they hit the last 1/4 of tread if running gravel roads. Across the board Goodyear is the worst tires I have owned, the set that came on my 2014 were done at 23k. My wife's van had a strange pull that was caused by the Goodyears Will. Not own them.
You must be looking at some different tires, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W and the Hankook Dynapro ATm are nowhere near the same. The Dynapros were among the worst tires I have ever owned, will not run another set and if I buy another truck with them on it, they will be swapped out before I take delivery.

So far, the Falkens have been much better although the real test will be in 6 months when it snows. They are already light years better in the rain.
Old 07-11-2017, 12:29 PM
  #30  
Member
Thread Starter
 
SwedishSTile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Trabuco Canyon, CA
Posts: 71
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

That is so strange to me. Obviously YMMV, but after driving the Falkens for 10K miles I would give the nod to the Dynapro. Don't get me wrong, the Falken is a stout tire and for conditions with a lot of shale or volcanic rock I would take the Falkens, but for snow and rain I much prefer the dynapros. I have a couple of 4x4 vans that I run the Dynapros on. My primary use with one of the vans is skiing and winter camping, the other general expedition and dispersed camping with the family. The vans are HEAVY (10k+ and 8K+) and hard on tires. The dynapros hold up great.


I have run K02's, ATM's, Discoverer A/T3, Wildpeaks, Terra Grapplers, General Grabbers, and Open Country II's on my various 4x4's. By far, for all around street/dirt/snow/rain performance against price and ride civility I prefer the Hankooks.


I am guessing I am going to get about 30 out of the Falkens on the F-150. Ill take it as I hot rod that truck a bit, tow and do a fair amount of wheeling in it.


Quick Reply: Falken Wildpeak A/T3W Review



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:40 AM.