Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

F-150 Diesel Offers Best-in-Class

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2018, 02:42 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Cwprotek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 558
Received 86 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Napalm
your escape also weighed some 1000 or more lbs heavier than that 83 ranger which was a big factor. (I'd love to take an 83 escort or something and put that new 2.0 ecoboost mill in there or the even smaller 1.6L with a 6sp I bet it would get over 40 mpg)
My first car, not truck, was a 82 escort with a 1.6L engine. Putting gas in it was something I had to do once in a while.

That car was great on Gas mileage and horrible on power.
Old 01-08-2018, 05:22 PM
  #32  
Member
 
CityHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 77
Received 27 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Exciting news. There's going to be a lot of marketing power in 30 mpg. I'm looking forward to seeing how these preliminary estimates match up to real world use.
Old 01-08-2018, 05:49 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
stowaway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: OBX
Posts: 1,030
Received 268 Likes on 209 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chimmike
Yep, agreed. Lariat or platty with reduced payload from all the options will keep my STX more capable, and faster.

I suspect a heavier platty will probably max out at 25mpg anyway. 30 is a dream number.
The reduced payload will primarily come from the truck being a few hundred lbs heavier than the 3.5eb. Since the towing is also affected by the truck's weight (possible tongue weight decrease), and the lower hp keeping speeds down on the testing grades, that's why IMO the numbers are what they are.
Old 01-08-2018, 06:07 PM
  #34  
Member
 
kalalp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: South Sierra Foothills
Posts: 97
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

"Eitherway I look forward to driving one and checking it out. On the trim level thing - it's just like what Ram does on the ecodiesel. YOu just about can't get one unless it's on the upper tier - and it's a near 4K upcharge. In my mind that buys alot of gas. "


I have a 2014 Ram EcoDiesel that I bought new when they came out. Paid 29500 plus tax and license for a RCLB base unit. I stopped checking after 23 tanks but over that time the mpg was 27.6 hand calc. Diesels have typically gotten better than EPA estimates for me. Had a 2012 Passat that would get 50 on the road.

Ford is making a mistake by not making the diesel available in the lower trim levels. You can buy a 2017 Ram EcoDiesel Big Horn Quad Cab new off of the lot right now for 32k +T&L. That's a lot of truck for the money.

Diesel might not make bean counters happy but it does me. Bought my first one in 1984, new. Mercedes 190D.
Old 01-08-2018, 06:56 PM
  #35  
Grumpy Old Man
 
smokeywren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midland County Texas, just west of the star in my avatar
Posts: 3,129
Received 879 Likes on 686 Posts

Default

2018 Ford F-150 Diesel Gets Best-in-Class Torque and Towing
Ford has finally released numbers for its upcoming diesel-powered F-150, putting its truck into the best-in-class spot in seemingly every category in the half-ton truck segment. 250hp, 440 torque, 30 MPG.
http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2018/01/f-150-diesel-numbers-announced-250-hp-440-lb--ft-30-mpg.html


Ford has been trying to develop an F-150 diesel for years. Back before Ford split the sheets with Navistar, they developed a 6 cyl, 4.5L diesel that was a modular engine based in the 6.0L V8 diesel. Ford put that engine is some of their chassis-cab cab-over city delivery work trucks, but not in a pickup chassis.
Old 01-08-2018, 07:01 PM
  #36  
Member
 
denton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: nyc
Posts: 63
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I don't get this as far as a tow vehicle. So maybe there is engine braking. Slightly less torque and a lot less HP than the 3.5. Heavier engine I would think so no savings in payload, most likely. Seems like the whole thing is so that Ford can say 30 MILES A GALLON!
The following users liked this post:
isthatahemi (01-09-2018)
Old 01-08-2018, 08:16 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
SSowinski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 361
Received 46 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tmcolegr
Hasn't been announced yet that I can find - Fleet or MSRP as of the 12/26/17 Price Guide

Although not officially from Ford:

"The first pricing estimates we have from Ford peg the cost of a diesel as a $4000 upcharge over the 2.7-liter EcoBoost, a $2400 premium over the cost of 3.5-liter EcoBoost, and $3000 more than a 5.0-liter V-8."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/auto...uVh?li=BBnb4R5
This is $5000 CAD over base. It was $2000 CAD for the V8 when I bought my 3.5 NA.
Old 01-08-2018, 08:41 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
TexasFording's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 3,240
Received 600 Likes on 441 Posts

Default

I think this is a bad move by Ford. They'll be cannibalizing sales from the 3.5TT. The new gen 3.5 is putting a ton more HP and almost the same tq figures as the diesel at a cheaper price.

Even if the diesel gives you 75% more fuel economy (for the supposed 30 mpg which we know wont happen) when you add the extra cost of diesel and adblue, you'll have to drive the truck an additional 12 years to be able to break even. The truck will never get 30 MPG combined. At most I honestly think it'll get about 22 city, 30 hwy for a combined of about 27.

Add to that the fact that Ford has consistently had problems with their diesels (6.4L anyone) and it does not bode well for the diesel F150.

This is just a move to compete against the Titan Cummins (which itself is a huge fiasco) and the dodge ecodiesel.
Old 01-08-2018, 08:51 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
Tom_with_a_Truck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 403
Received 58 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

I don't think this will hurt 3.5 sales a bit. If you want to take off like a scalded dog, the 3.5 is going to do it while the diesel won't. It will get better mileage than the 3.5 (most likely), but that's a feature that you have to consider when buying. It won't draw very many sales from the 3.5 that the RAM diesel doesn't already threaten. The goal here, I think, is to outdo the competition. Make the people that are considering the RAM consider the 3.0 instead.

It's also planning for future contingencies on Ford's part. CAFE standard and other government regulations are at play. Got to keep the Feds happy.

Let me add that every sale that Ford's 3.0 takes from the 3.5 or the 5.0 is still a Ford sale. Every sale that the RAM takes from the 3.5 or 5.0 is NOT a Ford sale.

Last edited by Tom_with_a_Truck; 01-08-2018 at 08:53 PM. Reason: reiterate the point.
Old 01-08-2018, 10:07 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Blackbuzzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 728
Received 273 Likes on 167 Posts
Default

Since Oprah is going to be our next prez, according to NBC, its prudent for Ford to get cafe numbers up.

A diesel does this.


Quick Reply: F-150 Diesel Offers Best-in-Class



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:56 AM.