Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Experience with V8 cold air intakes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2018, 08:27 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
mikeinatlanta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 3,269
Received 1,329 Likes on 797 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by todd92
Heat soak can only be an issue if the intake is open in the engine compartment and then only at very low speeds. Most intakes are sealed now which eliminates this concern.
Yep, with such a short tube flowing outside air, I'd have to see real temp rise data before buying into the heat soak story, regardless of the material it's made from.
Old 06-03-2018, 09:14 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Ricktwuhk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 14,966
Received 5,989 Likes on 3,553 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by todd92
The same half truths and fallacies keep getting passed around.

1) The stock intake IS a cold air intake.

2) Aftermarket filters DO NOT trade poor filtration for increased airflow

3) Aftermarket intakes add noise. Gulping, whooshing, whistling and at differing levels. Buyer beware. Some sound good, some are really annoying.

4) A tune is NOT needed for an intake

5) Aftermarket intakes CAN provide gains. Negligible peak HP and TQ, but often small gains at other RPM's. More importantly, there is a noticeable improvement in throttle response and on turbo motors quicker turbo spool-up

6) Despite Ford's claim, you aren't going to overspeed a turbo with an intake. It's just another item on their comprehensive list of aftermarket mods they can and will use to try and deny warranty claims.

They aren't a waste on money if you understand what you are buying and what it can and cannot do.
And maybe 1% of buyers understand what they are buying and what it can (make more noise, reduce your IRA contributions) and cannot do (improve performance).

Originally Posted by mikeinatlanta
I'm that guy who will put this stuff on a dyno just to find out, but probably wouldn't bother with this one.

One anecdotal point I find interesting is that in the Ford letter regarding mods and warranty, they mention cold air intakes causing a turbo to spin up faster and higher than design, therefore cause denial of warranty. One has to wonder if they have actually tested or is it also just supposition on their part? Maybe just an excuse to deny warranty? The one take away for us is that installing a CAI does increase risk of a dealership giving you crap when you have an issue of some sort, even if unrelated. Yea yea Magnuson Moss and all that. Talking about the pain in the butt fight, not who is right.
Right, they just make s*it up, because there is no legal jeopardy in doing that, and statements from a company are never reviewed by legal counsel...
The following users liked this post:
silvius (06-03-2018)
Old 06-03-2018, 10:08 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
PerryB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Chico, Ca.
Posts: 4,574
Received 964 Likes on 742 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by todd92
The same half truths and fallacies keep getting passed around.



2) Aftermarket filters DO NOT trade poor filtration for increased airflow .
I put a K&N "cold air" induction kit on a 7.3 PSD I had about 15 years ago. A few months down the road I decided it was time to service it, as I drive in a lot of dusty conditions. When I pulled the filter off the end of the tube, I was shocked to find a visible layer of fine dust in the tube. The filter fit perfectly, there were no leaks. This was being passed through the filter. I've heard it theorized that it's due to the oil film causing the sub-micron particles to stick and be seen, whereas they'd pass undetected with a dry filter. I'm not adequately sold. We have 4 Honda ATV's with oiled foam filters and the induction boots are always spotless. If you look at the ads for these gauze filter kits, they all brag about flow but nobody talks about filtration quality. I'd love to see a lab test with micron numbers, but after seeing that dirty tube I don't think anything's going to sell me on gauze again.
Old 06-03-2018, 02:01 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Takeda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 2,562
Received 620 Likes on 434 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PerryB
I put a K&N "cold air" induction kit on a 7.3 PSD I had about 15 years ago. A few months down the road I decided it was time to service it, as I drive in a lot of dusty conditions. When I pulled the filter off the end of the tube, I was shocked to find a visible layer of fine dust in the tube. The filter fit perfectly, there were no leaks. This was being passed through the filter. I've heard it theorized that it's due to the oil film causing the sub-micron particles to stick and be seen, whereas they'd pass undetected with a dry filter. I'm not adequately sold. We have 4 Honda ATV's with oiled foam filters and the induction boots are always spotless. If you look at the ads for these gauze filter kits, they all brag about flow but nobody talks about filtration quality. I'd love to see a lab test with micron numbers, but after seeing that dirty tube I don't think anything's going to sell me on gauze again.


Years ago, I did my own testing, comparing OEM paper filter media to K&N oiled gauze media. I did a smoke test on both, the K&N passed the smoke, the OEM paper filter blocked the smoke. Below are photos of both filters at the same magnification, you can see why the K&N passed debris, and dirt (with oil) that the paper filter won’t pass.




K&N oiled gauze filter media:









OEM paper filter media:



The following 3 users liked this post by Takeda:
funnyman06 (06-04-2018), PerryB (06-03-2018), UncleG (06-04-2018)
Old 06-03-2018, 02:17 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
mikeinatlanta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 3,269
Received 1,329 Likes on 797 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ricktwuhk
Right, they just make s*it up, because there is no legal jeopardy in doing that, and statements from a company are never reviewed by legal counsel...
EDIT: nevermind. some are not worth even trying.

Last edited by mikeinatlanta; 06-03-2018 at 02:27 PM.
Old 06-03-2018, 02:56 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Sikwill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: TEXAS!
Posts: 1,508
Received 1,627 Likes on 690 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jdvass
This will go down as one of the great debates of our time. Right up there with Star Wars vs. Star Trek, GM vs. Ford vs. Ram, and Coke vs. Pepsi.


Wait, you can't possibly be serious. Star Trek?!?!? A TV show vs the ultimate sci-fi motion picture powerhouse?? Please.
Old 06-04-2018, 04:43 AM
  #27  
Member
 
UncleG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 2,124
Received 357 Likes on 262 Posts
Default

Coke for mixer !
Old 06-04-2018, 12:17 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
MoltenF150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 161
Received 34 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

CAI for Ford F-150 = Light cash on fire.

Same effect.
Old 06-04-2018, 12:33 PM
  #29  
Super Duper Senior Member

 
tuflehundon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,804
Received 346 Likes on 281 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by todd92
The same half truths and fallacies keep getting passed around.

1) The stock intake IS a cold air intake.

2) Aftermarket filters DO NOT trade poor filtration for increased airflow

3) Aftermarket intakes add noise. Gulping, whooshing, whistling and at differing levels. Buyer beware. Some sound good, some are really annoying.

4) A tune is NOT needed for an intake

5) Aftermarket intakes CAN provide gains. Negligible peak HP and TQ, but often small gains at other RPM's. More importantly, there is a noticeable improvement in throttle response and on turbo motors quicker turbo spool-up

6) Despite Ford's claim, you aren't going to overspeed a turbo with an intake. It's just another item on their comprehensive list of aftermarket mods they can and will use to try and deny warranty claims.

They aren't a waste on money if you understand what you are buying and what it can and cannot do.
This. I put a CAI on my 2000 Mustang GT. Buddy was going back to stock to trade in his Stang. and offered me his in exchange for my stock one +cash super cheap. The stock intake in the Mustang also pulled air from the wheel well like our trucks do.

It was noisier. They do a lot with the stock intake to make them quiet. The one I had was a BBK and it wasn't super loud, but I have heard some others that were way noisier.

I did not see any gain in MPG's

I did see slightly better throttle response at the low end. But it wasn't enough that i would have paid full price for the intake.

Something else to consider is if you take your truck off road. I have seen some of the more open intakes have really wet filters after a day in the mud. Enclosed ones like the S&B seemed to do fine though. That's one of the main reasons I haven't gotten one for my truck.
Old 06-04-2018, 12:41 PM
  #30  
Gone Golfin
iTrader: (3)
 
idrive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: St George Utah
Posts: 5,675
Received 2,271 Likes on 1,391 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tuflehundon
The stock intake in the Mustang also pulled air from the wheel well like our trucks do.

.
The 2015+ do?


Quick Reply: Experience with V8 cold air intakes



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:16 PM.