Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

In defense of the 2.7 ecoboost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2019, 07:38 AM
  #231  
Senior Member
 
whoch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Liberty Hill, Texas
Posts: 621
Received 359 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

<chris on MNF>. Now here's a thread that has outlived it's actual usefulness.</chris on MNF>.

The 2.7L, the 3.5L the 5.0L and the 3.3 engine ALL have a good place in the F-150 lineup. There will ALWAYS be something faster, or more expensive or drive better or worse with a tune.. or crater for "what some will say is" bad design.

Pick the one you need, drive it, mod it "or not". but com-on man.. I know it's been a long winter for man of us, but time to get out there and start j just enjoying family, pets and getting over the BS of who's dick is bigger that seems to be abound on most message boards over the winter months.

What Ford has done with the engine lineup is pretty amazing. Should be interesting to see what they do over the next 10 years as well.
The following 7 users liked this post by whoch:
2AF150GA (04-17-2019), 68injunhed (04-17-2019), finsfan21 (04-17-2019), jmslf150 (04-17-2019), kehyler (04-18-2019), KWS 2.7 (04-22-2019), UnkLeRaRa (04-17-2019) and 2 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 04-17-2019, 08:15 AM
  #232  
Senior Member
 
Sirikenewtron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,183
Received 844 Likes on 495 Posts

Default

After owning all the engines and now a 2019 3.5 I have to say the 2.7 was the most impressive one. I literally beat the crap out of that little engine and it just kept on going, running strong and zero weird sounds, unlike both my 1st and 2nd gen 3.5's
Old 04-17-2019, 08:20 AM
  #233  
Senior Member
 
doug97gxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 4,736
Received 1,919 Likes on 1,143 Posts
Default

after owning imports most of my life i find it funny to see you guys post over and over that a 2.7 is a little engine .. its not little by any means and it has turbo's
Old 04-17-2019, 08:35 AM
  #234  
Senior Member
 
dalola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,277
Received 1,585 Likes on 950 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by doug97gxe
after owning imports most of my life i find it funny to see you guys post over and over that a 2.7 is a little engine .. its not little by any means and it has turbo's
Sure it is....keeping in context, we're discussing .5T pickups, not Japanese sports cars. The 2.7 is the smallest displacement engine available in a .5T pickup (US market), along with the new GM 2.7. The fact that it competes with, and beats, some of the bigger engines in the segment is very impressive.
Old 04-17-2019, 08:41 AM
  #235  
Senior Member
 
68injunhed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: SE Kansas
Posts: 705
Received 264 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by whoch
<chris on MNF>. Now here's a thread that has outlived it's actual usefulness.</chris on MNF>.

The 2.7L, the 3.5L the 5.0L and the 3.3 engine ALL have a good place in the F-150 lineup. There will ALWAYS be something faster, or more expensive or drive better or worse with a tune.. or crater for "what some will say is" bad design.

Pick the one you need, drive it, mod it "or not". but com-on man.. I know it's been a long winter for man of us, but time to get out there and start j just enjoying family, pets and getting over the BS of who's dick is bigger that seems to be abound on most message boards over the winter months.

What Ford has done with the engine lineup is pretty amazing. Should be interesting to see what they do over the next 10 years as well.
You get out of here with that common sense.....there's no place for that here!
The following 3 users liked this post by 68injunhed:
jabradt85 (04-17-2019), kehyler (04-18-2019), williegator (04-17-2019)
Old 04-17-2019, 08:51 AM
  #236  
Senior Member
 
bisonp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,059
Received 461 Likes on 293 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by whoch
The 2.7L, the 3.5L the 5.0L and the 3.3 engine ALL have a good place in the F-150 lineup. There will ALWAYS be something faster, or more expensive or drive better or worse with a tune.. or crater for "what some will say is" bad design.

Pick the one you need, drive it, mod it "or not". but com-on man.. I know it's been a long winter for man of us, but time to get out there and start j just enjoying family, pets and getting over the BS of who's dick is bigger that seems to be abound on most message boards over the winter months.

What Ford has done with the engine lineup is pretty amazing. Should be interesting to see what they do over the next 10 years as well.
I think this gets lost sometimes. The last time I bought a truck I had a choice between the anemic 4.6 and the decent performing but unremarkable 5.4. The little 2.7 performs way better than the 5.4 ever did and is significantly more efficient. The difference is pretty remarkable.
The following users liked this post:
whoch (04-17-2019)
Old 04-17-2019, 09:07 AM
  #237  
FORD lifer
 
montanaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: The Quad Cities - relocated from Montana
Posts: 1,232
Received 246 Likes on 185 Posts

Default

I didn’t intend to fire you up, but the common sense says that if you take a teeny 165 inch motor, and work it like a 390, that you are pushing it hard.

Now if the primary use for your truck truck is to cruise the kids to school, you won’t overstress it.

Hook up a trailer full of dirt behind it, and run it at boost and it will pull it, up hill and down hill if the turbos are spinning.

They are too new yet to see what the long term results are, but I’m thinking that my advice of not overworking them is solid.

But if you think they are a Cummins Cargomaster Diesel, go right ahead!��
Old 04-17-2019, 09:32 AM
  #238  
Senior Member
 
bisonp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,059
Received 461 Likes on 293 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by montanaman
I didn’t intend to fire you up, but the common sense says that if you take a teeny 165 inch motor, and work it like a 390, that you are pushing it hard.

Now if the primary use for your truck truck is to cruise the kids to school, you won’t overstress it.

Hook up a trailer full of dirt behind it, and run it at boost and it will pull it, up hill and down hill if the turbos are spinning.

They are too new yet to see what the long term results are, but I’m thinking that my advice of not overworking them is solid.

But if you think they are a Cummins Cargomaster Diesel, go right ahead!��
That I agree with. But keep in mind my last Ford V8, a 5.4, was an utter POS that cost me thousands in repairs by the time it hit 100K.

And yes the 2.7 is actually built much like a diesel with the CGI block, offset connecting rods, bowled pistons, water cooled exhaust manifolds, etc. Common sense says that does matter. And it won't get worked as hard anyway being that its payload and towing is so much lower.
Old 04-17-2019, 12:17 PM
  #239  
Senior Member
 
dalola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,277
Received 1,585 Likes on 950 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by montanaman
I didn’t intend to fire you up, but the common sense says that if you take a teeny 165 inch motor, and work it like a 390, that you are pushing it hard.

Now if the primary use for your truck truck is to cruise the kids to school, you won’t overstress it.

Hook up a trailer full of dirt behind it, and run it at boost and it will pull it, up hill and down hill if the turbos are spinning.

They are too new yet to see what the long term results are, but I’m thinking that my advice of not overworking them is solid.

But if you think they are a Cummins Cargomaster Diesel, go right ahead!��
Based on the punishment Ford put the 2.7 through during development, I would feel better about pushing this engine hard over any of the others. Jus sayin...
Old 04-17-2019, 12:34 PM
  #240  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
kehyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 971
Received 221 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dalola
Based on the punishment Ford put the 2.7 through during development, I would feel better about pushing this engine hard over any of the others. Jus sayin...
you mean the Baja 500? I feel like they thrashed the 3.5 harder than the 2.7 at-least in their marketing materials.


Quick Reply: In defense of the 2.7 ecoboost



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:04 AM.