Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

In defense of the 2.7 ecoboost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2019, 05:08 PM
  #141  
Senior Member
 
w00t692's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,229
Received 612 Likes on 439 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nubbins_
They don't help, that's for sure. Unlike the 2018 2.7, 3.5 and 5.0, the Raptor's 3.5HO also falls as far short of the crank numbers as its Boss used to when dyno'd with its stock 35" KO2s.

As for the 2.7, it's a different animal and it's not going to live up to the 5.0 on the dyno, even with its '18 improvements, because everyone's eyes are fixated on the Coyote's numbers at 6500rpm. But that low-end torque spike and broad torque band all the way to 5000 is something that an NA Coyote can only dream of. It's super fun to drive the Coyote like a madman, but some days you just don't really feel like mashing into the pedal when you're driving around town, and that's where the 2.7 shines.
Negative. It it about right for rated power. Where it falls largely short of it's rating is torque. It's down about 20% from rated power (average) and like 26% on rated torque. In essence it's head and shoulders above the old 6.2 in pretty much every way. Did i mention a 93 tune bumps wheel torque from around 390-400 up to 520 and horsepower from 360 up to about 450?

The raptor needs a supercharged v8 in it but the HO 3.5 is no slouch.
Old 02-14-2019, 05:19 PM
  #142  
Senior Member
 
Vengenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 432
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

payload wise, how is the 2.7? I know that depends on the options like tailgate step, twin panel roof, etc.

but i don't want to feel like a slouch with two kids seats in the back and the bed filled up with bags, presents, etc.
Old 02-14-2019, 05:27 PM
  #143  
Senior Member
 
BadCon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,037
Received 366 Likes on 250 Posts
Default

Its all already been said, but I really liked the 2.7 in my sister's crew cab. She also had the 3.5 before it, and the 2.7 felt every bit as powerful...at least from 0-60. I personally own a supercharged 5.0, but I feel the 2.7 makes an excellent truck engine for 95% of all F150 drivers and I'd happily own one if I needed another daily driver.
The following 2 users liked this post by BadCon:
Jgshooter (02-19-2019), Mark Miller (02-19-2019)
Old 02-15-2019, 11:39 AM
  #144  
Senior Member
 
Sirikenewtron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,183
Received 844 Likes on 495 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Vengenz

but i don't want to feel like a slouch with two kids seats in the back and the bed filled up with bags, presents, etc.
Oh it absolutely won't feel like a slouch with that load, it'll feel like a raised sports car. I have my 2017 2.7 crew cab 3.15 gears loaded down the same way often and through the West Coast mountains, there is no lack of power
The following users liked this post:
Jgshooter (02-19-2019)
Old 02-15-2019, 01:32 PM
  #145  
Senior Member
 
nubbins_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 525
Received 195 Likes on 146 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vengenz
payload wise, how is the 2.7? I know that depends on the options like tailgate step, twin panel roof, etc.

but i don't want to feel like a slouch with two kids seats in the back and the bed filled up with bags, presents, etc.
Issue is not the 2.7 itself. Ford considers the 2.7 a "lighter duty" engine alongside the 3.3, which means that you [usually] get lower rGAWR (3300 lbs compared to the usual 3800 lb springs), the thinner frame, and therefore less payload out of the box compared to the 5.0, 3.5EB and 3.0PS. As of now, the 2.7L Payload Package is still available for 145" WB trucks, which gets you the 9.75" rear end, "HD" frame (as opposed to "LD" and "HDPP"), and generally a GVWR around 7000 lbs.
Old 02-18-2019, 07:00 PM
  #146  
Senior Member
 
Wrenchbender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Rochester,NY
Posts: 386
Received 80 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Hi All,I got the 2.7 because for me it was the best choice,I came from a 2014 3.5 and drove all 3 of the line up and this new 2.7 with the cast iron block and port and direct injection impressed me the most.To everyone be happy with your choice and to Fo Mo Co for having a great line up.
The following 2 users liked this post by Wrenchbender:
Jgshooter (02-19-2019), Slvr (04-14-2019)
Old 02-22-2019, 09:04 AM
  #147  
Junior Member
 
Bigblockchevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 24
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I bought the 2.7 specifically for fuel economy. Unfortunately it’s really been a disappointment in that area. I’m at 17 ave over 2,200 miles since purchasing in December. Half my driving is highway and I drive like an old lady.

Kinda bummed that it can only tow 5,000 pounds too, not that I would tow that much anyway. That information was pretty clear in owners manual but all the advertising for max tow must have distracted me from the fine print.

those are the only things I can complain about however. I love the truck.

Last edited by Bigblockchevy; 02-22-2019 at 09:10 AM.
The following users liked this post:
doug97gxe (02-22-2019)
Old 02-22-2019, 09:37 AM
  #148  
Senior Member
 
dalola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,277
Received 1,585 Likes on 950 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bigblockchevy
I bought the 2.7 specifically for fuel economy. Unfortunately it’s really been a disappointment in that area. I’m at 17 ave over 2,200 miles since purchasing in December. Half my driving is highway and I drive like an old lady.

Kinda bummed that it can only tow 5,000 pounds too, not that I would tow that much anyway. That information was pretty clear in owners manual but all the advertising for max tow must have distracted me from the fine print.

those are the only things I can complain about however. I love the truck.
The lowest configured 2.7 F150 has a tow rating of 7500lbs, so not sure where you're getting the 5000 lb figure. Also, if you drive "like an old lady" as you describe, and only get 17mpg, you have something wrong with your truck.
Old 02-22-2019, 09:57 AM
  #149  
Member
 
mark_j's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 49
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vengenz
payload wise, how is the 2.7? I know that depends on the options like tailgate step, twin panel roof, etc.

but i don't want to feel like a slouch with two kids seats in the back and the bed filled up with bags, presents, etc.
I have a 2017 screw with twin panel sunroof and 2.7 w payload package, 3.55 gears. I have two college age sons that are big boys, like myself. The entire family of four weighs around 900 pounds. With the bed full of luggage and beach gear, I averaged 21 mpg at 65-70 mph on a 16 hour round trip this summer. Never felt underpowered; anything but actually. This truck walks all over my 2005 5.4 screw.

Last edited by mark_j; 02-22-2019 at 09:59 AM.
Old 02-22-2019, 10:11 AM
  #150  
Senior Member
 
bisonp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,059
Received 461 Likes on 293 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dalola
The lowest configured 2.7 F150 has a tow rating of 7500lbs, so not sure where you're getting the 5000 lb figure. Also, if you drive "like an old lady" as you describe, and only get 17mpg, you have something wrong with your truck.
Not necessarily. I'm only averaging around 17 lifetime so far as well. Bought in November. Temps have have rarely gone above 20 F during that entire time and have usually been around or below 0, along with significant 4x4 use. I have gotten as high as 18 city and 24 highway (at 60 MPH), but that has not been the norm. I'm hoping it does better when it warms up. It's still over 4 MPG better than I was getting with my 5.4 in the winter and it has a lot more power so I can't complain too much.


Quick Reply: In defense of the 2.7 ecoboost



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29 AM.