Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Autostart Efficiency Question

Old 07-19-2017, 12:07 PM
  #61  
Ford Truck Lover
 
LoneWolfTrucker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,514
Received 748 Likes on 457 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Napalm
wonder if it's not connected to an actual battery constant line.

or as mentioned too sensitive to voltage drop. My escort doesn't seem to mind it at all and I have it set to show battery voltage (one of the display options) and it will dip to around 12.2 sitting at a light. Hasn't gone below that yet but it also doesn't stay off that long right now being summer.



I think you read my post wrong - or backwards.

I argued that starting a modern car today doesn't take the fuel gulp that cars of yore used to need. so that myth that just stating a car takes more fuel that letting it run for a while is not true today.



your fuel gage was probably also busted.

but some simple numbers for the crowd

3.5L ecoboost mill - stock tune - at idle with normal load (radio on, AC, no lights) will require .54 gallons / hour to run. at idle.

2.7L ecoboost mill - stock tune - etc - .51 gallons per hour

GM 6.2L V8 (LS3 or Truck cam) - stock tune - at idle with normal load (radio on, AC, no lights) .65-.71 gallons per hour to run.

* values approximate.

I'd have to look up others but I promise you this your 94 s10 was most likely within either of these values if not higher.

So 8 hours - half a gallon per hour - would need 4 gallons - which should easily show up on a gage.

Also as pointing out - I don't know where you drive but I do know in my commute especially going home - when school is in session - there are 2 places where I might sit at a stop light 5-7 minutes. In 10 days worth, that's nearly a hour. And that's just one light.

So yes it can - for some driving paths - save a good bit.
Yeah my Blazer, with that huge Chevy V6 4.3L, didn't burn anywhere near that much. Obviously there are other factors (winter vs summer blend, temperature, etc).

At most it was 1/8th of tank, which was 2.5 gallons for that vehicle (20 gallon tank). And my gas gauge was fine.

Last edited by LoneWolfTrucker; 07-19-2017 at 12:12 PM.
Old 07-19-2017, 12:24 PM
  #62  
Senior Member
 
MUFFMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Kitchener Ontario. Canada
Posts: 973
Received 129 Likes on 101 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LoneWolfTrucker
Several years ago when i was still a bachelor, I started my 94 S-10 Blazer and locked it running out in front of my apartment to warm up. I then went into the apartment, and completely forgot (got a phone call, then got busy doing some things around the apartment). About 8 hours later I remembered. I had just over 3/4 of a tank of gas when I started it, and when I ran out to move it back to my spot and turn it off, after 8 hours, it was at 3/4 of tank. 8 hours idling used roughly 1/16th of a tank of gas.

The point, idle time doesn't burn much fuel. The start-stop technology is for emissions AND for long-term fuel savings. (Think 1/16th of tank of gas per vehicle per month over the course of several months.)

Personally, as one that isn't very environmentally minded, I hate it. My 16 3.5EB doesn't have it. Which is why I am no hurry to upgrade even though I think the 18 Sports are sweet.
Completely agree. We have several generators on various sites, and we can leave them running all day, when, for an example are only used a few minutes per hour, and are still basically full of fuel end of day. When framers are using them pretty well the full hour, we can't get 4 hours out of them
Old 07-19-2017, 12:27 PM
  #63  
Senior Member
 
gregsf150stx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: TN
Posts: 4,809
Received 531 Likes on 407 Posts

Default

I just push the little button above my touch screen after I start the truck, and never have to worry about it.

My Chevy Malibu has it, and I hate it. no button to disable it.
Old 07-19-2017, 12:32 PM
  #64  
09 FX4
 
stormsearch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 693
Received 179 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

Newer vehicles have a much higher electrical demand (electrical fans being one of them at 40+ amps) which will load an engine. Alternator efficiency for this vehicle is around 74% and most of our trucks have a 200A or larger alternator. Eliminating loads on the engine is one of the reasons why EPAS was added. I'm sure there are other factors but this is the significant one. If we want to quickly warm up a cold engine, turn on heated features to load the engine.
The following users liked this post:
LoneWolfTrucker (07-20-2017)
Old 07-19-2017, 12:41 PM
  #65  
Senior Member
 
DraKhen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,164
Received 175 Likes on 141 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JAMADOR
^ On point #1, auto s/s wouldn't have engaged, as it is disabled if the driver's seat belt is not buckled (assuming you were out of the truck talking to the officer).
And, over the course of a half hour, the engine likely would have started due to vehicle charging or heating/cooling.
True. My #1 point was just that idling burns enough gas in a 3.5 EcoBoost to make a noticeable difference. My #2 point was just that my commute is a good example of why the a s/s system makes sense.

-John
The following users liked this post:
JAMADOR (07-19-2017)
Old 07-20-2017, 09:01 AM
  #66  
Ford Truck Lover
 
LoneWolfTrucker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,514
Received 748 Likes on 457 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stormsearch
Newer vehicles have a much higher electrical demand (electrical fans being one of them at 40+ amps) which will load an engine. Alternator efficiency for this vehicle is around 74% and most of our trucks have a 200A or larger alternator. Eliminating loads on the engine is one of the reasons why EPAS was added. I'm sure there are other factors but this is the significant one. If we want to quickly warm up a cold engine, turn on heated features to load the engine.
Very good point.
Old 07-24-2017, 09:35 AM
  #67  
Senior Member
 
etekberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 481
Received 152 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jctevere
The engine is stopped at a specific "efficient" spot in the combustion cycle to allow for quickest restart and least stress possible on the starter
This is why I love this forum.
Old 07-24-2017, 10:08 AM
  #68  
Senior Member
 
vulnox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 3,531
Received 2,547 Likes on 1,344 Posts

Default

I love the S/S feature so far. It helps that we also have a 2016 C-Max Energi which when the primary battery is depleted runs in hybrid mode and does S/S.

The advantage of the C-Max, which I could see coming to non-Hybrid-Electric vehicles in the future is that the A/C and heat don't rely on the engine. Even in MI I notice how quickly the A/C starts to lose its cooling ability once the F-150 engine turns off.

The truck starts the engine before it gets too hot though, but that further reduces the efficiency of the feature. Moving the A/C compressor to electric drive like the C-Max would allow it to keep going regardless as long as there is battery power. But maybe that's the problem, drawing current for the A/C and having enough to restart the engine may require a bigger battery system.
Old 07-25-2017, 10:53 AM
  #69  
Senior Member
 
Napalm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Memphis TN
Posts: 2,335
Received 430 Likes on 329 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by vulnox
I love the S/S feature so far. It helps that we also have a 2016 C-Max Energi which when the primary battery is depleted runs in hybrid mode and does S/S.

The advantage of the C-Max, which I could see coming to non-Hybrid-Electric vehicles in the future is that the A/C and heat don't rely on the engine. Even in MI I notice how quickly the A/C starts to lose its cooling ability once the F-150 engine turns off.

The truck starts the engine before it gets too hot though, but that further reduces the efficiency of the feature. Moving the A/C compressor to electric drive like the C-Max would allow it to keep going regardless as long as there is battery power. But maybe that's the problem, drawing current for the A/C and having enough to restart the engine may require a bigger battery system.
Reason they didn't do that is because there would need to be a place for a much larger battery and they would have to make a few other changes. So this is as I say the cheap implementation of start stop.

and yes it doesn't allow for as much efficiency as it could but the test study showed very little difference.

even if it ran electric AC you'd have to re charge that main battery during the runs and that energy is still lost.

The modern variable compressor and letting it start back at idle during stops was a fair trade off - since the truck (and some other ford vehicles) were not going to have a hybrid drive motor. Also Heat is the bigger issue - in those cold winter situations heating the cab with electromat duct heater takes quite a bit of electrical load too. again without the large pile for a hybrid drive system - and the regen braking that comes with it - it wasn't work the effort.


OR so I was told.

Some police models in the next year will also come with the same start stop system that was on the 2017 2.7L ecoboost mill.


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 PM.